Long-term impact of full-thickness rectal prolapse treatment on fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is frequently associated with rectal prolapse, but little is known about recovery after treatment of the prolapse. OBJECTIVE: We therefore aimed to investigate the long-term outcome of fecal incontinence in a cohort of patients suffering from full-thickness rectal prolapse. DESIGN: A database of 145 patients diagnosed with full-thickness rectal prolapse was compiled prospectively over a 7-year period (2003-2010). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were referred to a single institution and assessed by standardized questionnaires, anorectal manometry, endosonography, and evacuation proctography. Fecal incontinence was evaluated according to the Cleveland Clinic Score; continence improvement was defined by ≥50% improvement of the Cleveland Clinic Score. RESULTS: Among the population studied (134 women, 11 men; median follow-up, 38.9 months [range, 21.2-67.2]), 103 patients (71%) underwent operation for their prolapse and 42 (29%) did not. According to the Cleveland Clinic Score, 139 patients (96%) suffered from fecal incontinence before treatment and 64 (46%) reported improvement at the end of the follow-up. Pretreatment history of incontinence symptoms for >2 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14-3.46; P = .015) and ventral rectopexy (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.026-3.326; P = .04) were associated with continence improvement. Patients who underwent an operative procedure other than ventral rectopexy had similar outcome as compared with nonoperated patients. Conversely, chronic pelvic pain precluded fecal incontinence improvement (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.135-0.668; P = .0017). LIMITATIONS: Follow-up, returned questionnaires, and the heterogeneous reasons put forth for declining surgery may introduce some methodologic bias. CONCLUSION: Fecal incontinence in patients suffering from rectal prolapse is improved when ventral rectopexy is performed compared with other operative or medical therapies.

Does an aberrant right hepatic artery really influence the short- and long-term results of a pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease? A matched case-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: An aberrant right hepatic artery (ARHA) is a common anatomic variation. The risk associated with ARHA during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) continues to be debated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and survival after PD with ARHA against a matched cohort of patients without ARHA. METHODS: PD with an ARHA performed between January 2000 and September 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with an ARHA (group 1) were matched (1:2) to patients without an ARHA (group 2) according to gender, age, body mass index, type of tumor, and lymph node status. Peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (group 1) and 55 patients (group 2) were compared. In group 1, an ARHA entered the tumor in six cases (20.7%), was sacrificed in four cases, and repaired in two cases. There was no difference regarding the rate of intraoperative and postoperative variables between the two groups. The oncological clearance (P = 0.731) and survival (overall survival, P = 0.843; disease-free survival, P = 0.832) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the presence of an ARHA during PD was not associated with worse postoperative outcomes or survival.

No surgery for full-thickness rectal prolapse: what happens with continence?

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only validated means of treating overt rectal prolapses, but both patients and physicians may decline or postpone the surgical approach. However, little is known on the functional outcome of nonoperated rectal prolapse. The aim of the present study was to highlight the natural history of overt rectal prolapse in patients for whom surgery was avoided or delayed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 206 patients complaining of full-thickness rectal prolapse were referred to a single institution that provided anorectal physiology for functional anorectal disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal manometry, endosonography, and evacuation proctography constituted a prospective database. Fecal incontinence was evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic score (CCIS), and constipation was evaluated with the Knowles Eccersley Scott Symptom score (KESS). RESULTS: Forty-two nonoperated patients (mean age: 61 ± 16 years) were compared to those of operated patients paired according to age and gender: the mean follow-up was 44 ± 26 months. The two groups had a similar past-history, follow-up, stool frequency, and main complaints, but lower quantified symptomatic scores and a better quality of life were reported in the nonsurgical group. At the end of follow-up, the nonsurgical group did not show any variation in CCI and KESS scores. By contrast, these two scores significantly improved in the rectopexy group. Sixteen nonoperated patients experienced a degradation of their continence status with an average increase of 5 ± 4.3 points of the CCIS. The patients with a CCIS <7 at referral were likely to deteriorate as compared to those having a higher score. Patients with a symptom history longer than 4 years never improved and in two-thirds continence deteriorated throughout the follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the absence of the surgical option, patients with a 4-year duration of rectal prolapse and those with mild incontinence had no chance of improvement. These findings may be taken into account when surgery of rectal prolapse is not chosen.