Phase II assessment of talabostat and cisplatin in second-line stage IV melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic melanoma is an incurable disease with an average survival of less than one year. Talabostat is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor with immunostimulatory properties. METHODS: This phase II, open label, single arm study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 75-100 mg/m2 cisplatin combined with 300-400 mcg talabostat bid for 6, 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response. The rate of complete responses, duration of overall objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Six objective partial responses were recorded in the 74 patients (8.1%) in the intention-to-treat population. Five of these responses involved the 40 evaluable patients (12.5%). Thirty-one percent of patients reported SAEs to the combination of talabostat and cisplatin. CONCLUSION: Acceptable tolerability was observed in the intention-to-treat population and antitumor activity was observed in 12.5% of evaluable patients, which is not greater than historical expectation with cisplatin alone.

RLIP76 and Cancer.

RLIP76 is a multifunctional membrane protein that transports glutathione conjugates of electrophilic compounds and other xenobiotics including chemotherapy agents out of cells. The protein is overexpressed in lung carcinomas, ovarian carcinomas, and melanomas. The protein also binds Ral and participates in mitotic spindle function, clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and triggers GTPase-activating protein activity. It is found throughout the cell, in membrane, cytosol, and the nucleus, and is known to shift between these compartments in response to stress. Loss of RLIP76 by antibody or antisense therapy is associated with increased sensitivity to radiation and chemotherapy. Conversely, liposomally delivered RLIP may treat poisoning and wounds.

Phase 1 study of escalating-dose OncoGel (ReGel/paclitaxel) depot injection, a controlled-release formulation of paclitaxel, for local management of superficial solid tumor lesions.

OncoGel is a novel depot formulation of paclitaxel designed for intralesional injection with a sustained paclitaxel delivery over approximately 6 weeks from a single administration. This phase 1 study was designed to characterize the toxicity, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity associated with OncoGel administered directly into solid tumors. OncoGel was injected into 18 superficially accessible advanced solid cancerous lesions among 16 adult patients for whom no curative therapy was available. Four dose cohorts were evaluated, ranging from 0.06 to 2.0 mg paclitaxel/cm3 tumor volume. OncoGel injections were generally well tolerated. There was one report of grade 3 injection site pain for a patient in the 0.25 mg paclitaxel/cm3 tumor volume dose cohort. Other adverse events considered related to the study drug included mild to moderate local responses to the injection itself. Systemic levels of paclitaxel were detectable only in 3.3% of the samples analyzed (range: 0.53-0.71 ng/ml). For the 14 patients evaluable for disease progression, stable disease was noted among six patients and progressive disease among eight patients. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not identified, the planned maximum dose was administered in the study. OncoGel delivered intralesionally at doses up to 2.0 mg paclitaxel/cm3 tumor volume was well tolerated and paclitaxel remained localized at the injection site, confirming design principles to minimize systemic exposure. Therefore, localized paclitaxel administration using OncoGel merits continued clinical development.

Clinical and local biological effects of an intratumoral injection of mda-7 (IL24; INGN 241) in patients with advanced carcinoma: a phase I study.

The melanoma differentiation-associated gene-7 (mda-7; approved gene symbol IL24) is a tumor suppressor gene whose expression induces selective apoptosis in tumor cells. To characterize the safety and biologic activity of mda-7 gene transfer, we conducted a phase I trial using intratumoral injections of an adenovirus containing the mda-7 construct (Ad-mda7; INGN 241; 2 x 10(10) to 2 x 10(12) vp) in 28 patients with resectable solid tumors. One hundred percent of injected lesions demonstrated INGN 241 vector transduction, transgenic mRNA, elevated MDA-7 protein, and apoptosis induction, with the highest levels near the injection site. Apoptosis of cells in injected tumors was consistently observed even in heavily pretreated patients. INGN 241 vector DNA and mRNA were detected more than 1 cm from the injection site, whereas MDA-7 protein and bioactivity were more widely distributed. Toxicity attributable to the injections was self-limiting and generally mild; however, one patient experienced a grade 3 SAE possibly related to the study drug. Evidence of clinical activity was found in 44% of lesions with the repeat injection schedule, including complete and partial responses in two melanoma patients. Thus intratumoral administration of INGN 241 is well tolerated, induces apoptosis in a large percentage of tumor cells, and demonstrates evidence of clinically significant activity.

Phase I trial of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in refractory solid tumor patients.

PURPOSE: To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evidence of antitumor activity of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in refractory cancer patients. METHODS: This was a Phase I, prospective, dose-escalation trial that employed a novel-dosing schema to investigate clinical safety. Patients were treated in six cohorts with topotecan (T)+gemcitabine (G). The doses of T and G were administered by 30-minute IV infusion, T on days one through five (0.3 mg/m2 to 1 mg/m2) and G on days one and 15 of a 28-day cycle (1000 mg/m2 to 1500 mg/m2). Toxicity was monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-three cancer patients were enrolled (colorectal, n=5; lung, n=4; gastric, n=4; esophageal, n=2; other, n=8). Two of three patients developed grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity attributed to study regimen, thereby fulfilling dose limiting toxicity requirements at cohort 6 (T, 1 mg/m2, G, 1500 mg/m2). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at cohort 5 (T, 1 mg/m2, G, 1250 mg/m2). Ten patients were treated at cohort 5. Nonhematologic adverse effects (AEs) >grade 3 attributed to the study regimen were not observed. Hematologic toxicity was frequent. Twenty-five percent of patients in cohort 2 and 50% of patients in cohorts 4, 5, and 6 had a reduction of ANC to <500 mm3. All neutropenic episodes were less than one week in duration. Five of the patients in the last three cohorts required delay and/or dose-reduction of G. Nineteen of 23 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. Two patients achieved a minimal response. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD was observed at a T dose of 1 mg/m2 administered on days 1 through 15, and a G dose of 1250 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 15 via 30 minute intravenous (IV) infusion.

Phase I study of oral CI-994 in combination with gemcitabine in treatment of patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and evidence of antitumor activity of CI-994 used in combination with gemcitabine. METHODS: This was a dose escalation trial in which gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was given as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. CI-994 was taken orally on consecutive days 1-21 at escalating doses of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mg/m2 per cohort (three patients/cohort). Plasma samples were collected on days 1 and 15 of course 1 and analyzed for CI-994 pharmacokinetic assessment. RESULTS: Twenty patients with advanced cancer received a total of 76 courses of treatment. Dose-limitingtoxicity occurred at the 8-mg/ m2 dose. Four of seven patients experienced thrombocytopenia during the first cycle. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in three of 10 (30%) courses at 8 mg/m2. In contrast, only two of 28 (7%) courses at 6 mg/m2 were associated with grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that absorption of CI-994 was rapid, with peak plasma concentrations occurring at the first sample 2 hours after dosing. Two patients achieved a minor response, 12 had stable disease (median duration, 105 days), four had progressive disease, and two were not evaluable. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-mg/m2 dose of CI-994 (p.o. x 21 days) was defined as the maximum tolerated dose that could safely be administered in combination with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15) during a 28-day cycle.