Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach. METHODS: This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient's pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.

Residual minimal disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a simple definition through an in-depth statistical analysis of the major outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain the simplest definition of minimal disease activity (MDA) and to compare it with published proposed definitions of MDA in patients with RA. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen patients with long-standing RA (LSRA) were evaluated for clinical and laboratory parameters. Factor analysis was performed to remove redundant variables included in the core set measure for MDA definition stated by the OMERACT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis allowed to obtain optimal cut-off predictors of a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) < or =2.85. These were tested in 112 LSRA and 95 early-onset RA (ERA) patients. RESULTS: Factor and ROC curve analysis showed that the best predictors of a DAS28 < or = 2.85 in LSRA cohort were: (i) ESR <20 mm/h (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 54%); (ii) swollen joint count (out of 28) < or =2 (sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 74%); (iii) patient global assessment (0-100) < or =15 (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 78%); and (iv) HAQ (0-3) < or =0.5 (sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 61%). To each of these four criteria we assigned a value of 1 when it was satisfied (score ranging: 0-4). The cut-off with the highest overall accuracy for identifying RA patients with DAS28 < or = 2.85 was a score > or =3. We adopted these four parameters in order to define the residual MDA (RMDA). Comparing RMDA criteria, in distinct 112 LSRA and 95 ERA patients, with OMERACT, Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index definitions of MDA, we found a good agreement in the LSRA cohort and moderate agreement in the ERA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: HAQ, PaGA, SJC28 and ESR allow identification of RA patients with an RMDA. The RMDA criteria behaves similarly to OMERACT definitions, but appears more simple and feasible.

Synovial B cells of rheumatoid arthritis express ZAP-70 which increases the survival and correlates with the inflammatory and autoimmune phenotype.

B cells have acquired an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since B cell depletion allowed to rescue patients poorly responders to TNFalpha blockers. This study focused on the involvement of ZAP-70 as a bio-marker of B cells immune activation in RA. ZAP-70 expression in synovial fluid (SF) B cells obtained from RA patients was increased compared to SF B cells of osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Moreover we found that ZAP-70 positive/CD38 positive and ZAP-70 positive/CD5 positive B cells were enriched in SF. The analysis of B cell apoptosis in vitro showed that the percentage of ZAP-70 negative B cells spontaneously undergoing apoptosis was significantly higher than ZAP-70 positive B cells. The ZAP-70 positive B cell ratio (SF/peripheral blood (PB)) showed a positive correlation with SF autoantibody levels and with local levels of BAFF and IL6. ZAP-70 positive B cells seem to define a subset characterized by increased survival and high relationship with local inflammation and autoimmunity.