Drug Calculation Errors in Anesthesiology Residents and Faculty: An Analysis of Contributing Factors.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding computational drug error rates in anesthesia residents and faculty. We investigated the frequency and magnitude of computational errors in a sample of anesthesia residents and faculty. METHODS: With institutional review board approval from 7 academic institutions in the United States, a 15-question computational test was distributed during rounds. Error rates and the magnitude of the errors were analyzed according to resident versus faculty, years of practice (or residency training), duration of sleep, type of question, and institution. RESULTS: A total of 371 completed the test: 209 residents and 162 faculty. Both groups committed 2 errors (median value) per test, for a mean error rate of 17.0%. Twenty percent of residents and 25% of faculty scored 100% correct answers. The error rate for postgraduate year 2 residents was less than for postgraduate year 1 (P = .012). The error rate for faculty increased with years of experience, with a weak correlation (R = 0.22; P = .007). The error rates were independent of the number of hours of sleep. The error rate for percentage-type questions was greater than for rate, dose, and ratio questions (P = .001). The error rates varied with the number of operations needed to calculate the answer (P < .001). The frequency of large errors (100-fold greater or less than the correct answer) by residents was twice that of faculty. Error rates varied among institutions ranged from 12% to 22% (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology residents and faculty erred frequently on a computational test, with junior residents and faculty with more experience committing errors more frequently. Residents committed more serious errors twice as frequently as faculty.

Comparison of Percutaneous Retrogasserian Balloon Compression and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: We compared and evaluated percutaneous retrogasserian balloon compression (PBC) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective comparative study, 202 patients with MS and concomitant TN were evaluated. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was required. Patients with a history of microvascular decompression or previous intervention were excluded. Between February 2009 and December 2013, 78 PBC procedures and 124 first-dosage GKRS procedures were performed. PBC procedures were successfully completed in all cases. The 2 groups were compared with regard to initial effect, duration of effect, and complications including type and severity. RESULTS: Immediate pain relief occurred in 87% of patients treated with PBC and in 23% of patients treated with GKRS. Kaplan-Meier plots for the 2 treatment modalities were similar. The 50% recurrence rate was at 12 months for the PBC group and 18 months for the GKRS group. Complication (excluding numbness) rates were 3% for GKRS and 21% for PBC. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 test, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: PBC and GKRS are effective techniques for treatment of TN in patients with MS. Fewer complications and superior long-term relief were associated with GKRS. We consider GKRS as the first option for the treatment of TN in patients with MS, reserving PBC for patients with acute, intractable pain.

Radiostethoscopes: an innovative solution for auscultation while wearing protective gear.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a radiostethoscope that could be modified and successfully used while wearing protective gear to solve the problem of auscultation in a hazardous material or infectious disease setting. DESIGN: This study was a randomized, prospective, and blinded investigation. SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of Miami-Jackson Memorial Hospital Center for Patient Safety. PARTICIPANTS: Two blinded anesthesiologists using a radiostethoscope performed a total of 100 assessments (50 each) to evaluate endotracheal tube position on a human patient simulator (HPS). INTERVENTIONS: Each lung of the HPS was ventilated separately using a double lumen tube. Four ventilation patterns (ie, right lung ventilation only; left lung ventilation only; ventilation of both lungs; and an esophageal intubation or no breath sounds) were simulated. The ventilation pattern was determined randomly and participants were blinded. An Ambu-Bag was used for ventilation. An assistant moved the radiostethoscope to the right and left lung fields and then to the abdomen of the HPS while ventilating. Subjects had to identify the ventilation pattern after listening to all three locations. A third member of the research team collected responses. Each subject, who wore both types of respirator (positive and negative), performed a total of 25 trials. Participants later compared the two types of respirators and their ability to auscultate for breath sounds. RESULTS: Subjects were able to verify the correct ventilation pattern in all attempts (100 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Radiostethoscopes appear to provide a viable solution for the problem of patient auscultation while wearing protective gear.

The effect of needle bevel position on pain for subcutaneous lidocaine injection.

It is a common practice for medical practitioners to use subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine to alleviate the pain of intravenous cannulation or line insertion. Although previous studies have assessed several factors affecting the pain associated with local anesthetic infiltration, there is a paucity of data on the effects of needle bevel position. In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the effect of two different needle bevel positions (bevel up versus bevel down) and the pain associated with the subcutaneous injection of 1% lidocaine in 50 adult volunteers. Significantly higher pain scores were observed when the needle was placed bevel down compared with bevel up (P = .02). No significant differences in pain scores were noted between the groups for age and gender.