Perceived family-centered care and post-traumatic stress in parents of infants cared for in the paediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Family-centred care (FCC), while a core value of paediatric hospitals, has not been well-studied in the paediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). AIMS: To describe parents' perceptions of FCC provided by nurses in the PCICU during their infant's recovery from neonatal cardiac surgery and explore associations of perceptions of FCC on parent post-traumatic stress (PTS) 4 months post-discharge. STUDY DESIGN: Data obtained from a previously conducted randomized clinical trial (RCT) on telehealth home monitoring after neonatal cardiac surgery at three free-standing paediatric hospitals were analysed from a subset of 164 parents who completed the FCC Scale at hospital discharge, which measures a parent's experience of nursing care that embodies core principles of FCC. The RCT intervention was provided after hospital discharge, having no influence on parent's perception of FCC. The intervention also had no effect on PTS. RESULTS: Perceived FCC was lowest for items 'nurses helped me feel welcomed' and 'nurses helped me feel important in my child's care'. Having 12%-19% points lower perception of FCC at hospital discharge was associated with parent experience of six or more PTS symptoms, at least moderate PTS symptom severity, or PTS disorder diagnosis at 4-month follow-up. Every 10% increase in parental perceptions of FCC was associated with less PTS symptoms (ß = -0.29, SE = 0.12; p = .02) and lower PTS symptom cluster scores of arousal (ß = -0.18, SE = 0.08; p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Parents who perceived lower FCC during their infants' hospitalization were at increased risk for the development of PTS symptoms, more PTS symptom severity and PTS disorder diagnosis 4-months post-discharge. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses have a prominent role to support the implementation of FCC for infants with cardiac defects and their parents. FCC may positively influence overall parent mental health and well-being, reducing the trauma and distress of the PCICU experience.

Diagnostic Identification of Acute Brain Dysfunction in Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Electronic Health Record: A Comparison of Four Definitions in a Reference Dataset.

OBJECTIVES: Acute brain dysfunction (ABD) in pediatric sepsis has a prevalence of 20%, but can be difficult to identify. Our previously validated ABD computational phenotype (CPABD) used variables obtained from the electronic health record indicative of clinician concern for acute neurologic or behavioral change. We tested whether the CPABD has better diagnostic performance to identify confirmed ABD than other definitions using the Glasgow Coma Scale or delirium scores. DESIGN: Diagnostic testing in a curated cohort of pediatric sepsis/septic shock patients. SETTING: Quaternary freestanding children's hospital. SUBJECTS: The test dataset comprised 527 children with sepsis/septic shock managed between 2011 and 2021 with a prevalence (pretest probability) of confirmed ABD of 30% (159/527). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CPABD was based on use of neuroimaging, electroencephalogram, and/or administration of new antipsychotic medication. We compared the performance of the CPABD with three GCS/delirium-based definitions of ABD-Proulx et al, International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference, and Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate. The posttest probability of identifying ABD was highest in CPABD (0.84) compared with other definitions. CPABD also had the highest sensitivity (83%; 95% CI, 76-89%) and specificity (93%; 95% CI, 90-96%). The false discovery rate was lowest in CPABD (1-in-6) as was the false omission rate (1-in-14). Finally, the prevalence threshold for the definitions varied, with the CPABD being the definition closest to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: In our curated dataset of pediatric sepsis/septic shock, CPABD had favorable characteristics to identify confirmed ABD compared with GCS/delirium-based definitions. The CPABD can be used to further study the impact of ABD in studies using large electronic health datasets.

A Pediatric Interprofessional Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Intervention: CICU Teams and Loved Ones Communicating (CICU TALC) is Feasible, Acceptable, and Improves Clinician Communication Behaviors in Family Meetings.

Parents of children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) are often unprepared for family meetings (FM). Clinicians often do not follow best practices for communicating with families, adding to distress. An interprofessional team intervention for FM is feasible, acceptable, and positively impacts family preparation and conduct of FM in the CICU. We implemented a family- and team-support intervention for conducting FM and conducted a pretest-posttest study with parents of patients selected for a FM and clinicians. We measured feasibility, fidelity to intervention protocol, and parent acceptability via questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Clinician behavior in meetings was assessed through semantic content analyses of meeting transcripts tracking elicitation of parental concerns, questions asked of parents, and responses to parental empathic opportunities. Logistic and ordinal logistic regression assessed intervention impact on clinician communication behaviors in meetings comparing pre- and post-intervention data. Sixty parents (95% of approached) were enrolled, with collection of 97% FM and 98% questionnaire data. We accomplished > 85% fidelity to intervention protocol. Most parents (80%) said the preparation worksheet had the right amount of information and felt positive about families receiving this worksheet. Clinicians were more likely to elicit parental concerns (adjusted odds ratio = 3.42; 95%CI [1.13, 11.0]) in post-intervention FM. There were no significant differences in remaining measures. Implementing an interprofessional team intervention to improve family preparation and conduct of FM is locally feasible, acceptable, and changes clinician behaviors. Future research should assess broader impact of training on clinicians, patients, and families.

Protocol for the Prone and Oscillation Pediatric Clinical Trial (PROSpect).

OBJECTIVES: Respiratory management for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) remains largely supportive without data to support one approach over another, including supine versus prone positioning (PP) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). DESIGN: We present the research methodology of a global, multicenter, two-by-two factorial, response-adaptive, randomized controlled trial of supine versus PP and CMV versus HFOV in high moderate-severe PARDS, the Prone and Oscillation Pediatric Clinical Trial (PROSpect, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03896763). SETTING: Approximately 60 PICUs with on-site extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania with experience using PP and HFOV in the care of patients with PARDS. PATIENTS: Eligible pediatric patients (2 wk old or older and younger than 21 yr) are randomized within 48 h of meeting eligibility criteria occurring within 96 h of endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: One of four arms, including supine/CMV, prone/CMV, supine/HFOV, or prone/HFOV. We hypothesize that children with high moderate-severe PARDS treated with PP or HFOV will demonstrate greater than or equal to 2 additional ventilator-free days (VFD). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome is VFD through day 28; nonsurvivors receive zero VFD. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include nonpulmonary organ failure-free days, interaction effects of PP with HFOV on VFD, 90-day in-hospital mortality, and among survivors, duration of mechanical ventilation, PICU and hospital length of stay, and post-PICU functional status and health-related quality of life. Up to 600 patients will be randomized, stratified by age group and direct/indirect lung injury. Adaptive randomization will first occur 28 days after 300 patients are randomized and every 100 patients thereafter. At these randomization updates, new allocation probabilities will be computed based on intention-to-treat trial results, increasing allocation to well-performing arms and decreasing allocation to poorly performing arms. Data will be analyzed per intention-to-treat for the primary analyses and per-protocol for primary, secondary, and exploratory analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PROSpect will provide clinicians with data to inform the practice of PP and HFOV in PARDS.

Design and rationale of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome - paediatrics (PICS-p) Longitudinal Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: As paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality declines, there is growing recognition of the morbidity experienced by children surviving critical illness and their families. A comprehensive understanding of the adverse physical, cognitive, emotional and social sequelae common to PICU survivors is limited, however, and the trajectory of recovery and risk factors for morbidity remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Post-Intensive Care Syndrome - paediatrics Longitudinal Cohort Study will evaluate child and family outcomes over 2 years following PICU discharge and identify child and clinical factors associated with impaired outcomes. We will enrol 750 children from 30 US PICUs during their first PICU hospitalisation, including 500 case participants experiencing ≥3 days of intensive care that include critical care therapies (eg, mechanical ventilation, vasoactive infusions) and 250 age-matched, sex-matched and medical complexity-matched control participants experiencing a single night in the PICU with no intensive care therapies. Children, parents and siblings will complete surveys about health-related quality of life, physical function, cognitive status, emotional health and peer and family relationships at multiple time points from baseline recall through 2 years post-PICU discharge. We will compare outcomes and recovery trajectories of case participants to control participants, identify risk factors associated with poor outcomes and determine the emotional and social health consequences of paediatric critical illness on parents and siblings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (protocol #843844). Our overall objective is to characterise the ongoing impact of paediatric critical illness to guide development of interventions that optimise outcomes among children surviving critical illness and their families. Findings will be presented at key disciplinary meetings and in peer-reviewed publications at fixed data points. Published manuscripts will be added to our public study website to ensure findings are available to families, clinicians and researchers. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04967365.

Sedation Research in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: Proposals for Future Study Design From the Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research IV Workshop.

OBJECTIVES: Sedation and analgesia for infants and children requiring mechanical ventilation in the PICU is uniquely challenging due to the wide spectrum of ages, developmental stages, and pathophysiological processes encountered. Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of sedative and analgesic management in pediatric patients have used heterogeneous methodologies. The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) IV hosted a series of multidisciplinary meetings to establish consensus statements for future clinical study design and implementation as a guide for investigators studying PICU sedation and analgesia. DESIGN: Twenty-five key elements framed as consensus statements were developed in five domains: study design, enrollment, protocol, outcomes and measurement instruments, and future directions. SETTING: A virtual meeting was held on March 2-3, 2022, followed by an in-person meeting in Washington, DC, on June 15-16, 2022. Subsequent iterative online meetings were held to achieve consensus. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one multidisciplinary, international participants from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and family members of PICU patients attended the virtual and in-person meetings. Participants were invited based on their background and experience. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Common themes throughout the SCEPTER IV consensus statements included using coordinated multidisciplinary and interprofessional teams to ensure culturally appropriate study design and diverse patient enrollment, obtaining input from PICU survivors and their families, engaging community members, and using developmentally appropriate and validated instruments for assessments of sedation, pain, iatrogenic withdrawal, and ICU delirium. CONCLUSIONS: These SCEPTER IV consensus statements are comprehensive and may assist investigators in the design, enrollment, implementation, and dissemination of studies involving sedation and analgesia of PICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Implementation may strengthen the rigor and reproducibility of research studies on PICU sedation and analgesia and facilitate the synthesis of evidence across studies to improve the safety and quality of care for PICU patients.

Design and Implementation of a New Orientation Program Based on Core Competencies and a Clinical Mentor Model.

A large pediatric hospital redesigned the traditional task-based orientation program to one based on the Synergy Model for Patient Care nurse competencies, enhanced identification of learning needs, critical thinking exercises, and use of experienced staff in the role of clinical mentor. Development of a role to coordinate the learning experiences of the new hire was essential to creation of a model built upon the framework of the core competencies needed to care for a unit's population of patients.

An observational pilot study of sleep disruption and delirium in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disruption is frequently observed in children with delirium in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). OBJECTIVES: This observational pilot study explores relationships among modifiable characteristics of the PICU environment (i.e., light, sound, clinician caregiving patterns), sleep disruption, and delirium. METHODS: Ten children, 1 to 4 years old, were recruited within 48 h of PICU admission and followed until discharge. A light meter, dosimeter, and video camera were placed at bedside to measure PICU environmental exposures. Sleep was measured via actigraphy. Twice daily delirium screening was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the PICU environment, sleep, and delirium experienced by children. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine relationships among variables. RESULTS: Average participant age was 21 (SD = 9.6) months. Eight (80%) were admitted for respiratory failure. Median PICU length of stay was 36.7 (IQR[29.6, 51.5]) hours, which limited data collection duration. Delirium prevalence was 60% (n = 6). Children experienced low daytime light levels (x¯ = 112.8 lux, SD = 145.5) and frequent peaks (x¯ = 1.9/hr, SD = 0.5) of excessive sound (i.e., ≥ 45 A-weighted decibels). Clinician caregiving episodes were frequent (x¯ = 4.5/hr, SD = 2.6). Children experienced 7.3 (SD = 2.1) awakenings per hour of sleep and a median sleep episode duration of 1.4 (IQR[0.6, 2.3]) hours. On average, children with delirium experienced 1.1 more awakenings per sleep hour and 42 fewer minutes of sleep per sleep episode during the night shift. Increased clinician care frequency and duration were associated with worse sleep quality and delirium. CONCLUSIONS: Study results will inform future, large-scale research and nurse-driven sleep promotion interventions.

A Targeted Analysis of Serial Cytokine Measures and Nonpulmonary Organ System Failure in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure: Individual Measures and Trajectories Over Time.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need for research exploring the temporal trends of nonpulmonary organ dysfunction (NPOD) and biomarkers in order to identify unique predictive or prognostic phenotypes. We examined the associations between the number and trajectories of NPODs and plasma biomarkers of early and late inflammatory cascade activation, specifically plasma interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), respectively, in the setting of acute respiratory failure (ARF). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation for Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial and Biomarkers in Acute Lung Injury (BALI) ancillary study. SETTING: Multicenter. PATIENTS: Intubated pediatric patients with ARF. INTERVENTIONS: NPODs were evaluated against plasma IL-1ra and IL-8 levels on individual days (1 to 4 d after intubation) and longitudinally across days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Within the BALI cohort, 432 patients had at least one value for IL-1ra or IL-8 within days 0 through 5. 36.6% had a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, 18.5% had a primary diagnosis of sepsis and 8.1% died. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that increasing levels of both plasma IL-1ra and IL-8 were statistically significantly associated with increasing numbers of NPODs (IL-1ra: days 1-3; IL-8: days 1-4), independent of sepsis diagnosis, severity of oxygenation defect, age, and race/ethnicity. Longitudinal trajectory analysis identified four distinct NPOD trajectories and seven distinct plasma IL-1ra and IL-8 trajectories. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression revealed that specific IL-1ra and IL-8 trajectory groups were associated with greater NPOD trajectory group ( p = 0.004 and p < 0.0001, respectively), independent of severity of oxygenation defect, age, sepsis diagnosis, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Both the inflammatory biomarkers and number of NPODs exhibit distinct trajectories over time with strong associations with one another. These biomarkers and their trajectory patterns may be useful in evaluating the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in critically ill children and identifying those phenotypes with time-sensitive, treatable traits.

Hemodynamic Effects of a High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Open-Lung Strategy in Critically Ill Children With Acquired or Congenital Cardiac Disease.

OBJECTIVES: To study the hemodynamic consequences of an open-lung high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) strategy in patients with an underlying cardiac anomaly with or without intracardiac shunt or primary pulmonary hypertension with severe lung injury. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Medical-surgical PICU. PATIENTS: Children less than 18 years old with cardiac anomalies (± intracardiac shunt) or primary pulmonary hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from 52 subjects were analyzed, of whom 39 of 52 with cardiac anomaly (23/39 with intracardiac shunt) and 13 of 52 with primary pulmonary hypertension. Fourteen patients were admitted postoperatively, and 26 patients were admitted with acute respiratory failure. Five subjects (9.6%) were canulated for ECMO (of whom four for worsening respiratory status). Ten patients (19.2%) died during PICU stay. Median conventional mechanical ventilation settings prior to HFOV were peak inspiratory pressure 30 cm H 2 O (27-33 cm H 2 O), positive end-expiratory pressure 8 cm H 2 O (6-10 cm H 2 O), and F io2 0.72 (0.56-0.94). After transitioning to HFOV, there was no negative effect on mean arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, or arterial lactate. Heart rate decreased significantly over time ( p < 0.0001), without group differences. The percentage of subjects receiving a fluid bolus decreased over time ( p = 0.003), especially in those with primary pulmonary hypertension ( p = 0.0155) and without intracardiac shunt ( p = 0.0328). There were no significant differences in the cumulative number of daily boluses over time. Vasoactive Infusion Score did not increase over time. Pa co2 decreased ( p < 0.0002) and arterial pH significantly improved ( p < 0.0001) over time in the whole cohort. Neuromuscular blocking agents were used in all subjects switched to HFOV. Daily cumulative sedative doses were unchanged, and no clinically apparent barotrauma was found. CONCLUSIONS: No negative hemodynamic consequences occurred with an individualized, physiology-based open-lung HFOV approach in patients with cardiac anomalies or primary pulmonary hypertension suffering from severe lung injury.

Symptom Assessment for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Principles and Priorities: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Mechanically ventilated patients experience many adverse symptoms, such as anxiety, thirst, and dyspnea. However, these common symptoms are not included in practice guideline recommendations for routine assessment of mechanically ventilated patients. An American Thoracic Society-sponsored workshop with researchers and clinicians with expertise in critical care and symptom management was convened for a discussion of symptom assessment in mechanically ventilated patients. Members included nurses, physicians, a respiratory therapist, a speech-language pathologist, a critical care pharmacist, and a former intensive care unit patient. This report summarizes existing evidence and consensus among workshop participants regarding 1) symptoms that should be considered for routine assessment of adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation; 2) key symptom assessment principles; 3) strategies that support symptom assessment in nonvocal patients; and 4) areas for future clinical practice development and research. Systematic patient-centered assessment of multiple symptoms has great potential to minimize patient distress and improve the patient experience. A culture shift is necessary to promote ongoing holistic symptom assessment with valid and reliable instruments. This report represents our workgroup consensus on symptom assessment for mechanically ventilated patients. Future work should address how holistic, patient-centered symptom assessment can be embedded into clinical practice.

Pediatric Critical Care Outcomes: State of the Science.

Children who survive the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are at risk of developing post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-p). PICS-p, defined as new physical, cognitive, emotional, and/or social health dysfunction following critical illness, can affect the child and family. Historically, synthesizing PICU outcomes research has been challenging due to inconsistency in study design and in outcomes measurement. PICS-p risk may be mitigated by implementing intensive care unit best practices that limit iatrogenic injury and by supporting the resiliency of critically ill children and their families.

Developing a Nursing Dashboard to Align Nursing Care Delivery With Patient and Family Needs.

Clinical units and their nursing staffs are heterogeneous. Advances in data and analytics provide opportunities to better match patient needs with nurse competencies. Building upon a previous publication on a unit profile dashboard, team members now describe development of a nursing dashboard aggregating characteristics of staff on each clinical unit of the hospital. This article describes methods, challenges, and future directions for nurse leaders to use the dashboards to optimize care delivery and patient and nurse outcomes.

Risk Factors for Positive Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screening and Associated Outcomes in Children Surviving Acute Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors and outcomes associated with a positive post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screen following pediatric acute respiratory failure treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Nonprespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-one U.S. PICUs. PATIENTS: Children in the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) trial (NCT00814099, ClinicalTrials.gov ) over 8 years old who completed PTSD screening 6 months after discharge. INTERVENTIONS: RESTORE sites were randomized to a targeted, nurse-directed sedation strategy versus usual care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PTSD screening was completed by 102 subjects using the Child Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale; a score of greater than or equal to 11 was considered screening positive for PTSD. Cognitive status was categorized using Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category; health-related quality of life (HRQL) was evaluated using child-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Version 4.0. Thirty-one children (30%) screened positive for PTSD. Children with a positive screen endorsed symptoms in all categories: reexperiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal. Most endorsed that symptoms interfered with schoolwork ( n = 18, 58%) and happiness ( n = 17, 55%). Screening positive was not associated with RESTORE treatment group. In a multivariable logistic model adjusting for age, sex, and treatment group, screening positive was independently associated with lower median income in the family's residential zip code (compared with income ≥ $80,000; income < $40,000 odds ratio [OR], 32.8; 95% CI, 2.3-458.1 and $40,000-$79,999 OR, 15.6; 95% CI, 1.3-182.8), renal dysfunction (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.7-16.7), and clinically significant pain in the PICU (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.9-35.7). Children with a positive screen experienced decline in cognitive function and impaired HRQL more frequently than children with a negative screen. CONCLUSIONS: Screening positive for PTSD is common among children following acute respiratory failure and is associated with lower HRQL and decline in cognitive function. Routine PTSD screening may be warranted to optimize recovery.

Executive Summary of the Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PALICC-2).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to update our 2015 work in the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS), considering new evidence and topic areas that were not previously addressed. DESIGN: International consensus conference series involving 52 multidisciplinary international content experts in PARDS and four methodology experts from 15 countries, using consensus conference methodology, and implementation science. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Patients with or at risk for PARDS. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven subgroups conducted systematic or scoping reviews addressing 11 topic areas: 1) definition, incidence, and epidemiology; 2) pathobiology, severity, and risk stratification; 3) ventilatory support; 4) pulmonary-specific ancillary treatment; 5) nonpulmonary treatment; 6) monitoring; 7) noninvasive respiratory support; 8) extracorporeal support; 9) morbidity and long-term outcomes; 10) clinical informatics and data science; and 11) resource-limited settings. The search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and was updated in March 2022. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology was used to summarize evidence and develop the recommendations, which were discussed and voted on by all PALICC-2 experts. There were 146 recommendations and statements, including: 34 recommendations for clinical practice; 112 consensus-based statements with 18 on PARDS definition, 55 on good practice, seven on policy, and 32 on research. All recommendations and statements had agreement greater than 80%. CONCLUSIONS: PALICC-2 recommendations and consensus-based statements should facilitate the implementation and adherence to the best clinical practice in patients with PARDS. These results will also inform the development of future programs of research that are crucially needed to provide stronger evidence to guide the pediatric critical care teams managing these patients.

Nonpulmonary Treatments for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an updated review of the literature on nonpulmonary treatments for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) from the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost). STUDY SELECTION: Searches were limited to children with PARDS or hypoxic respiratory failure focused on nonpulmonary adjunctive therapies (sedation, delirium management, neuromuscular blockade, nutrition, fluid management, transfusion, sleep management, and rehabilitation). DATA EXTRACTION: Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction using a standardized data collection form. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to identify and summarize evidence and develop recommendations. Twenty-five studies were identified for full-text extraction. Five clinical practice recommendations were generated, related to neuromuscular blockade, nutrition, fluid management, and transfusion. Thirteen good practice statements were generated on the use of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, delirium, sleep management, rehabilitation, and additional information on neuromuscular blockade and nutrition. Three research statements were generated to promote further investigation in nonpulmonary therapies for PARDS. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations and statements about nonpulmonary treatments in PARDS are intended to promote optimization and consistency of care for patients with PARDS and identify areas of uncertainty requiring further investigation.

Operational Definitions Related to Pediatric Ventilator Liberation.

BACKGROUND: Common, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability among research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable, and can be pooled to establish best practices. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists, and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions that were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions. RESULTS: In eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥ 80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of noninvasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28 ventilator-free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support. INTERPRETATION: We propose that these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability and facilitate comparison.

Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Document.

Rationale: Pediatric-specific ventilator liberation guidelines are lacking despite the many studies exploring elements of extubation readiness testing. The lack of clinical practice guidelines has led to significant and unnecessary variation in methods used to assess pediatric patients' readiness for extubation. Methods: Twenty-six international experts comprised a multiprofessional panel to establish pediatrics-specific ventilator liberation clinical practice guidelines, focusing on acutely hospitalized children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Eleven key questions were identified and first prioritized using the Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations and Evidence. A systematic review was conducted for questions that did not meet an a priori threshold of ⩾80% agreement, with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies applied to develop the guidelines. The panel evaluated the evidence and drafted and voted on the recommendations. Measurements and Main Results: Three questions related to systematic screening using an extubation readiness testing bundle and a spontaneous breathing trial as part of the bundle met Modified Convergence of Opinion on Recommendations criteria of ⩾80% agreement. For the remaining eight questions, five systematic reviews yielded 12 recommendations related to the methods and duration of spontaneous breathing trials, measures of respiratory muscle strength, assessment of risk of postextubation upper airway obstruction and its prevention, use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support, and sedation. Most recommendations were conditional and based on low to very low certainty of evidence. Conclusions: This clinical practice guideline provides a conceptual framework with evidence-based recommendations for best practices related to pediatric ventilator liberation.