Convergence of stakeholders' environmental threat perceptions following mass coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef.

Managing human use of ecosystems in an era of rapid environmental change requires an understanding of diverse stakeholders' behaviors and perceptions to enable effective prioritization of actions to mitigate multiple threats. Specifically, research examining how threat perceptions are shared or diverge among stakeholder groups and how these can evolve through time is increasingly important. We investigated environmental threat perceptions related to Australia's Great Barrier Reef and explored their associations before and after consecutive years of mass coral bleaching. We used data from surveys of commercial fishers, tourism operators, and coastal residents (n = 5254) conducted in 2013 and 2017. Threats perceived as most serious differed substantially among groups before bleaching but were strongly aligned after bleaching. Climate change became the most frequently reported threat by all stakeholder groups following the coral bleaching events, and perceptions of fishing and poor water quality as threats also ranked high. Within each of the 3 stakeholder groups, fishers, tourism operators, and coastal residents, the prioritization of these 3 threats tended to diverge in 2013, but convergence occurred after bleaching. These results indicate an emergence of areas of agreement both within and across stakeholder groups. Changes in perceptions were likely influenced by high-profile environmental-disturbance events and media representations of threats. Our results provide insights into the plasticity of environmental-threat perceptions and highlight how their convergence in response to major events may create new opportunities for strategic public engagement and increasing support for management.

Convergencia de la Percepción de las Amenazas Ambientales por los Actores Sociales después del Blanqueamiento Masivo del Coral de la Gran Barrera Arrecifal Resumen La administración del uso que las personas dan a los ecosistemas en una época de cambios ambientales rápidos requiere un entendimiento del comportamiento de diferentes actores sociales y sus percepciones para facilitar la priorización de las acciones que mitigan a las múltiples amenazas. Específicamente, las investigaciones que examinan cómo se comparten o difieren las percepciones de las amenazas entre los grupos de actores y cómo estas percepciones pueden evolucionar con el tiempo son cada vez más importantes. Investigamos las percepciones de las amenazas ambientales relacionadas con la Gran Barrera Arrecifal en Australia y exploramos sus asociaciones antes y después de varios años consecutivos de blanqueamiento masivo del coral. Usamos datos tomados de encuestas realizadas a pescadores comerciales, operadores turísticos y residentes de la costa (n = 5,254) en 2013 y 2017. Las amenazas percibidas como las más serias difirieron sustancialmente entre los tres grupos antes del blanqueamiento, pero se alinearon marcadamente después del blanqueamiento. El cambio climático se convirtió en la amenaza reportada con mayor frecuencia por todos los grupos de actores después de los eventos de blanqueamiento del coral. Las percepciones de la pesca y la baja calidad del agua como amenazas también tuvieron una clasificación alta. Dentro de cada uno de los tres grupos de actores (pescadores, operadores turísticos y residentes de la costa) la priorización de estas tres amenazas tendió a diferir en 2013 pero la convergencia ocurrió después del blanqueamiento. Estos resultados indican un surgimiento de áreas de acuerdo dentro y entre los grupos de actores. Los cambios en las percepciones probablemente estuvieron influenciados por eventos de perturbación ambiental de alto perfil y la representación mediática de las amenazas. Nuestros resultados proporcionaron conocimiento sobre la plasticidad de las percepciones de las amenazas ambientales y resalta cómo su convergencia en la respuesta a los eventos más importantes puede crear nuevas oportunidades para la participación estratégica del público e incrementar el apoyo para su manejo.

Beauty and the reef: Evaluating the use of non-expert ratings for monitoring aesthetic values of coral reefs.

Aesthetic values are a key driver of tourist and recreational visitation to natural areas and are listed among the selection criteria for World Heritage properties. However, assessment and monitoring of aesthetic values in natural areas, and coral reefs in particular, have proven to be challenging. In our study we explored the value and limitations of a rapid assessment approach involving non-expert ratings of aesthetic beauty as a potential tool for long-term monitoring of aesthetic values in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Australia. We investigated the sensitivity of a rating scale for detecting change and sampling requirements for monitoring, as well as observer biases, using an online survey of 1417 Australians in which respondents rated the aesthetic beauty of 181 coral reef images on a ten-point scale. Our results show average aesthetic rating scores ranged from 4.35 to 8.34 on a scale from 1 (ugly) to 10 (beautiful), with potential to detect differences of statistical significance within one point, indicating sufficient sensitivity to change for monitoring purposes. We found that a sample size of c.100 ratings per image provided a reasonable balance between cost (i.e. sample size) and accuracy (i.e. error). Older respondents (>65 years) with higher levels of coral reef visitation, experience and interest were more likely to give extreme ratings, however, there was no apparent predictor for this bias to be positive or negative (high or low ratings). Based on these results we provide recommendations to assist coral reef managers in their use and interpretation of non-expert aesthetic ratings in coral reef monitoring.