RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland lesions are routinely evaluated by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) preoperatively. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has standardized salivary gland FNAC reporting. Its application in major salivary glands (MSGs) has been well-established; however, its utility in minor salivary glands (MiSGs) is not well-known. We studied the utility of MSRSGC in MiSG FNAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search of MiSG FNACs from 2 academic institutions (2006-2023) was performed. FNACs were classified using the MSRSGC. Histologic data were reviewed and recorded. The risk of malignancy (ROM), risk of neoplasia (RON), diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: The series included 43 MiSG FNAC (24 males and 18 females), with a mean age of 55 years (range 10-92). Aspirated sites included the following: palate, buccal space, floor of mouth, lip, tongue, and maxillary sinus. FNACs were classified as nondiagnostic (1), nonneoplastic (3), atypia of undetermined significance (6), benign neoplasm (9), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (15), suspicious for malignancy, (2) and malignant (7). The risk of neoplasia and risk of malignancy were 87% and 39%. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology offers valuable information for stratifying MiSG lesions. However, the distribution and the range of diagnostic entities encountered differ somewhat from those in MSGs. For instance, mucinous cyst contents may warrant unique consideration in MiSG; while an atypical classification is recommended in MSGs, the high prevalence of mucoceles in MiSG may tilt this group toward benignity.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category is heterogeneous, leading to variations in its use. To prevent excessive usage, the AUS rate should be ≤10%. Although this recommendation aims to maintain diagnostic quality, it lacks supporting data. The AUS:Malignant (AUS:M) ratio has been proposed as a metric tool to evaluate AUS use. Furthermore, integrating ThyroSeq v3 (TSV3) positive call rate (PCR) and the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM) have been put forward as performance improvement tools. The authors reviewed their AUS:M ratios, TSV3 PCR, MDROM, and ROM. METHODS: Thyroid aspirates evaluated in the laboratory (from August 2022 to September 2023) by seven cytopathologists (CPs) were identified. AUS:M ratio, MDROM, ROM, and TSV3 PCR results for the laboratory and each CP were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2248 aspirates were identified (462 AUS and 80 malignant). The AUS:M ratio for the laboratory was 5.8 (CPs range, 2.8 to 7.3). The TSV3 PCR for the laboratory was 23% (CPs range, 11% to 41%). The MDROM for the laboratory was 19% (CPs range, 9% to 31%), whereas the ROM was 36% (CPs range, 29% to 50%). Linear regression analysis of AUS:M ratio versus TSV3 PCR and MDROM demonstrated a moderate positive correlation but a weak negative correlation to the ROM. Deviations from established targets were attributed to multiple factors. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study underscore the importance of using a combination of metrics to evaluate diagnostic practices. By dissecting the practice patterns of each CP, the authors can measure different aspects of their performance and provide individualized feedback.
