Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 28(1): 134-42, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24052341

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate using national data the role of surgeon laparoscopic caseload in determining outcome following elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: All patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic primary colorectal cancer resection between 2002 and 2008 were included from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Surgeon teams were divided into tertiles according to the mean laparoscopic caseload per year. High volume corresponded to more than 12 laparoscopic procedures per year and low volume corresponded to seven or fewer procedures per year. Outcome measures were 30-day in-hospital mortality, return to theatre (RTT), 30-day medical morbidity, 365-day medical morbidity, length of stay (LOS), and unplanned 28-day readmission. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of surgeons selecting patients for the laparoscopic approach between 2002-2003 and 2007-2008. In 2002-2003, a total of 41 surgeon teams performed laparoscopic resections whereas in 2007-2008 there were 398 surgeon teams. The patients of high-volume surgeon teams had a shorter LOS [OR 0.88 (0.85-0.91), p < 0.0001]. Patients of medium-volume surgeon teams had the highest medical morbidity rates [30-day medical morbidity: OR 1.24 (1.04-1.48), p = 0.015; 365-day medical morbidity: OR 1.22 (1.04-1.45), p = 0.018]. There were no differences between the high- and low-volume groups in terms of mortality, morbidity, RTT, or readmission. CONCLUSION: Although there has been a significant increase in the number of surgeon teams offering the minimal access approach, this study has not found a consistent relationship between surgeon laparoscopic cancer surgery caseload and outcome. WHAT'S NEW IN THIS MANUSCRIPT: This is the first national study to explore the role of surgical volume in determining outcome following laparoscopic surgery. This study questions the impact of surgeon caseload on laparoscopic surgical outcome.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 25(1): 63-71, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18160545

RESUMO

A chronological literature review illustrates how undergraduate and postgraduate education and training in the care of the dying and bereaved is inadequate worldwide. This is despite the foundation of the modern hospice movement in the United Kingdom in 1967 and its wider dissemination as a specialty in 1985. This situation has implications for those doctors working in both primary and secondary care, and this paper describes a 3-day course which has been successfully run in the West Midlands, UK, since 1997 for family physicians in training. A pre-course survey of 250, with a response rate of 54%, in 2003 revealed that 100% of respondents felt that they needed further training, and 51.5% said that they had had no previous training in palliative care.


Assuntos
Educação Médica Continuada , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Cuidados Paliativos , Luto , Currículo , Humanos , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...