Factor analysis of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in American Indian women.

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is widely used to assess depressive symptoms in the general population. It lacks validation for widespread use within the American Indian population, however. To address this gap, we explored and confirmed the factor structure of the CES-D among a community sample of southeastern American Indian women. We analyzed data from a sample of 150 American Indian women ages 18-50 from a southeastern tribe who had complete responses on the CES-D as part of a larger cross-sectional, community-engaged study. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the measure's validity. We examined EFA models ranging from one to five factors, with the four-factor structure yielding the best overall model fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03). Differences between the four-factor EFA-retained structure from our sample and Radloff's four-factor structure emerged. Only the interpersonal factor was common to both factor structures. Our study findings confirm the validity of the original four-factor structure of the CES-D for younger adult American Indian women in the southeast. Contrasting findings with the EFA-retained structure, however, provide a more nuanced interpretation of our results.

Methodological Considerations in Scale Refinement with Diverse Populations: A Case Example Using the CES-D with a Community Sample of American Indian Women.

Although many psychometric assessments are used extensively in population-based research to determine psychopathology, these tools have not been thoroughly validated or appropriately adapted for use in diverse populations. Indeed, depression measurement studies among American Indian and female populations are scarce, omitting key opportunities to tailor psychological measurement for this population. To build psychometric evidence of measures in this population, we used a procedural method to examine a standard psychological instrument-the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)-with a community sample of southeast American Indian women. Our results showed strong psychometric reliability of the 20-item CES-D. The "effort" item presented diminished validity, as demonstrated by a negative counter-intuitive item-to-total correlation (ITC) value. Dropping the "effort" item resulted in a 19-item scale with a better fit in the within-group examination of community-based American Indian women. Compared to the 20-item CES-D scale, the revised 19-item measure ("effort" item removed) resulted in minimal changes to women's depression categories. However, we did detect patterns in shifts such that the 19-item scale generally underestimated (i.e., placed women in a lower category) depressive symptoms compared to the 20-item scale. Depending on their study goals, researchers engaging in population-based research should carefully weigh the use of original scales that allow for consistency in reporting with refined scales that fit psychometrically. We present the outlined method as a tool that expands on current approaches in scale refinement, and aids researchers in making more informed decisions regarding refined scales with diverse populations.

Exploring a broader context of the home environment and its relationship with asthma control in American Indian children.

In this cross-sectional study of 60 American Indian mother-child dyads from Southeastern North Carolina, we examined whether childhood asthma control was related to household-level factors, such as environmental tobacco smoke and family management behaviors. We also examined the relationships among family management behaviors and maternal depressive symptoms. We used logistic regression to assess the relationships among childhood asthma control, the presence of environmental tobacco smoke, and family management behaviors, specifically condition management ability (CMA) and condition management effort (CME). We used linear regression to evaluate the relationships between both CMA and CME and maternal depressive symptoms. Better asthma control in children was associated with the absence of environmental tobacco smoke in the home and the maternal perception of asthma as a manageable condition. Mothers perceived an increase in effort to manage their child's asthma as their depressive symptoms increased. These findings emphasize the importance of environmental triggers, perceptions of condition management, and maternal mental health in controlling asthma in American Indian children. Interventions to reduce environmental triggers, treat maternal depressive symptoms, and support mothers in their ability to manage childhood asthma may yield better asthma control and help to reduce existing racial disparities in this population.

The Process of Integrating an Evidence-Based Intervention into a Public Health Department to Improve Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviors in Parents and Children.

The purpose of this manuscript is to describe a mutually beneficial collaboration with a Public Health Department and a University to implement an evidence-based program to teach nutrition and physical activity to improve adult and child outcomes. We first assessed the needs of the Public Health Department to build sustainable capacity. Next, all collaborators were invited to work together to focus on success. We invested in the leadership structure and strategically planned together. Finally, all of the collaborators worked together to practice cultural awareness. The process of implementing evidence-based programs allows all collaborators to emerge from the interaction stronger as a result of respectful dialogue and team building.

A community-engaged approach to investigate cardiovascular-associated inflammation among American Indian women: A research protocol.

American Indian women are more likely to die from cardiovascular disease (CVD) than White or African American women. Inflammatory processes may underlie CVD disparities by gender and race and may be critical to understanding population-specific drivers and potential buffers. Exposure to environmental air pollutants, especially particulate matter (PM), is known to be an important catalyst in CVD-associated inflammation. Positive psychological states, associated with low levels of inflammatory gene expression, could serve to moderate the inflammatory response to environmental air pollutants and ultimately lead to better cardiovascular health outcomes. The aim of the ongoing community-engaged and NIH-funded study described in this study protocol is to address the racial and gender gaps in CVD mortality by investigating the contextually relevant and culturally important determinants of health among American Indian women. In this paper we describe the procedures used to examine the relationship between environmental air pollutant exposures (PM10-2.5 and PM 2.5 ), psychological factors (e.g., depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, eudemonic well-being, and positive emotions), and cardiovascular-associated inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, Amyloid A, CBCs with differentials) in a sample of 150 women 18-50 years of age from the Lumbee Tribe in southeastern North Carolina. We describe lessons learned and strategies used in developing a community-engaged approach to enhance recruitment of American Indian women in biomedical research. The empirical data and community infrastructure resulting from this study will be foundational in designing and testing future interventions to reduce CVD-associated morbidity and mortality in American Indian women.