Retrospective case-control study to predict a potential underlying appendiceal tumor in an acute appendicitis context based on a CT-scoring system.

OBJECTIVES: To assess CT signs to discriminate an appendiceal tumor versus a non-tumoral appendix in an acute appendicitis context. METHODS: A 10-year bicentric retrospective case-control study was performed in adults. Patients with a histopathological appendiceal tumor and appendicitis were paired for age and sex with patients with non-tumorous appendicitis (1/3 ratio, respectively). Two senior radiologists blindly analyzed numerous CT findings with final consensus to perform univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. A diagnostic CT scan score was calculated with a bootstrap internal validation. Reproducibility was assessed based on the kappa statistic. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients (51 +/- 21 years; 114 males) were included (52 patients in the tumor group and 156 in the non-tumor group). In the multivariate analysis, an appendicolith and fat stranding were protective factors with OR = 0.2 (p = 0.01) and OR = 0.3 (p = 0.02), respectively, while mural calcifications (OR = 47, p = 0.0001), an appendix mass (OR = 7.1, p = 0.008), a focal asymmetric wall abnormality (OR = 4.9, p = 0, 001), or a ≥ 15 mm diameter (OR = 3.5, p = 0.009) were positive predictive factors of an underlying tumor. Using a ≥1 cut-off, our diagnostic score had an AUC = 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.82-0.93) and a positive likelihood ratio = 13.5 (95 % CI, 6.7-27.1). CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable scoring system based on CT findings, which is highly predictive of an underlying appendiceal neoplasm in an appendicitis context using a ≥1 cut-off.

Acute pelvic pain in females in septic and aseptic contexts.

Acute pelvic pain in women is a common reason for emergency department admission. There is a broad range of possible aetiological diagnoses, with gynaecological and gastrointestinal causes being the most frequently encountered. Gynaecological causes include upper genital tract infection and three types of surgical emergency, namely ectopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion, and haemorrhagic ovarian cyst rupture. The main gastrointestinal cause is acute appendicitis, which is the primary differential diagnosis for acute pelvic pain of gynaecological origin. The process of diagnosis will be guided by the clinical examination, laboratory study results, and ultrasonography findings, with suprapubic transvaginal pelvic ultrasonography as the first-line examination in this young population, and potentially cross-sectional imaging findings (computed tomography and MR imaging) if diagnosis remains uncertain.

Correlation between MR imaging - prognosis factors and molecular classification of breast cancers.

The molecular classification of breast cancers defines subgroups of cancer with different prognoses and treatments. Each molecular type representing the intrinsic signature of the cancer corresponds to a histological profile incorporating hormone receptors, HER2 status and the proliferation index. This article describes the correlations between this molecular classification obtained in routine clinical practice using histological parameters and MRI. It shows that there is a specific MRI profile for triple-negative cancers: distinct demarcation, regular edges, hyperintensity on T2 weighted signals and, particularly, a crown enhancement. It is important for the radiologist to understand this molecular classification, firstly because of the relatively suggestive appearance of triple-negative basal-like cancers in the molecular classification, secondly, and particularly, as cancers in patients with the BRCA1 mutation are often triple-negative meaning that the criteria for reading the MRI needs to be tailored to this feature of the cancers, and finally because the efficacy of MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy depends on the molecular class of cancer treated.

Mechanical occlusions: diagnostic traps and key points of the report.

Management of mechanical occlusion, particularly of the small intestine, has altered considerably over recent years, with a change of paradigm and the indication for surgery depending on the cause of the occlusion and any signs of entrapment or strangulation. It is therefore important today to make a positive diagnosis of mechanical occlusion, to assess its degree, its location and its cause, and to look for signs of entrapment and strangulation. Only computer tomography can provide the answers to these different questions. The aim of this paper is to provide a reminder of the CT signs that enable us to confirm diagnosis of the various aspects of mechanical occlusion of the stomach and duodenum, small intestine or colon, to emphasize and illustrate the diagnostic traps in CT and to set out the key points of a CT report of mechanical occlusion.

Infection of the right iliac fossa.

Febrile pain in the right iliac fossa is one of the most common reasons for consulting at an emergency service. Within this framework, the main diagnosis that is considered is appendicitis, the main complication of which is perforation. However, a certain number of other conditions can be responsible for this clinical picture, primarily including digestive tract and mesentery disorders including mesenteric lymphadenitis, Crohn's disease, infectious enterocolitis, small intestine or colonic diverticulitis, ischaemic colitis or cancer of the caecum. This article illustrates the imaging semiology of the various right colonic, iliac, mesenteric and appendicular conditions that could potentially cause an infection of the right iliac fossa. It specifies the indications of ultrasound and CT scans, respectively, which depend on the age of the patient and the clinical signs and symptoms. Though the CT scan is commonly used in abdominal emergencies in general, and particularly in clinical pictures of infection of the right iliac fossa, ultrasound remains recommended as first line imaging when confronted with suspected appendicitis or lymphadenitis in a young subject or in the monitoring of Crohn's disease.

Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

At our academic institution, we have noticed repeated examples of both false-positive and false-negative MR diagnoses in breast cancer. The most common diagnostic errors in interpreting MRI of the breast are discussed in this review and experience-based advice is provided to avoid similar mistakes. The most common reasons for false-positive diagnoses are misinterpretation of artefacts, confusion between normal enhancing structures and tumours and, above all, insufficient use of the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon, whereas false-negative diagnoses are made as a result of missed tiny enhancement, a background-enhancing breast, or enhancement interpreted as benign rather than malignant.

[Imaging features of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: about three cases]. / Aspect en imagerie des tumeurs de la granulosa de l'ovaire: à propos de trois cas.

Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary are rare, and included in the sex cord-stromal tumor category. They have a low malignancy potential and generally have a good prognosis. They are the most frequent hormone-secreting tumors of the ovary and may lead to suggestive clinical symptoms. Some biological markers (serum inhibin B and AMH) may be helpful for diagnosis, though their sensitivity is not perfect. Preoperative imaging diagnosis remains challenging due to the wide variability in morphology and lack of epidemiological data in the imaging literature (small patient populations). From a review of the clinical and MR imaging features of three cases of granulosa cell tumor of the adult and a review of the literature, we will describe a few imaging features that may suggest the correct diagnosis.

[Tomosynthesis: luxury or necessity?]. / Tomosynthèse: luxe ou nécessité

Digital mammography is replacing conventional film-screen mammography. One of its advantages is to offer options of advanced processing such as tomosynthesis. Tomosynthesis allows to avoid the overlap of tissues depitected on mammograms, and potentially to improve the detection of subtle lesion such as architectural distortion, permits the characterization of masses and of density asymmetry and the accurate measurement of beast lesion by a better delineation of the lesion borders. Furthermore, in cases of superimposition mimicking an abnormality, it can show the lack of a significant finding and decrease the recall rate. However, additional studies are necessary to evaluate its added valve by comparison to mammography in consecutive patients and not only in retrospectively selectioned cases and to define its indication in diagnostic and screening.

[Does breast density have an impact on the indications for MRI?]. / La densité mammaire change-t-elle les indications d'IRM du sein?

MRI indications in breast imaging in breast imaging are now well codified. In diagnostic and screening, MRI in recommended in patients with likely metastatic lymph nodes and in metastasis of unknown cause, and in women with high risk family. In characterisation MRI is recommend in non-calcified subtle findings, non suitable for biopsy. In the staging of a diagnosed breast cancer, MRI has a great impact both for the diagnosis and for the treatment, event if group of women for whom MRI is recommended is still discussed. In follow-up of patients with an history of breast cancer, MRI permits to differentiate recurrence from scarr and to monitor the response to a neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Dense breast don't constitute a MRI indication by itself, but strengthen recognized MRI indications. Fatty breast easily readable on mammogram don't justify not to perform MRI in the screening of women with high risk family. Conservely in the staging of a breast cancer in an woman or in the monitoring of a neo-adjuvant chemotherapy fatty breast may make US sufficient.