Exploratory Qualitative Focus Group Analysis of School-based Health Center Policy Issues: Insights From State Leaders.

INTRODUCTION: School-based health centers (SBHCs) provide students with critical, cost-effective access to health care. The pandemic accelerated a shift in SBHC care delivery. From the viewpoint of SBHC state leadership, this study aimed to describe changes since the last national SBHC health policy survey in 2017 through the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Leaders from state offices funding SBHCs and of School-Based Health Alliance affiliates participated in semistructured virtual focus groups in early 2022. Qualitative researchers triangulated focus group data with open-ended survey questions and performed thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The results confirmed a priori themes of increased funding, challenges in alignment around the definition, standardization, and metrics of SBHCs, and pandemic-related changes. Emerging themes included: (1) increased mental health services, (2) a shift toward telehealth and increased access delivery models, and (3) workforce challenges. DISCUSSION: These themes drive further exploration to sustain positive change, overcome challenges, and guide future quantitative SBHC policy analysis.

Developing National Standardized Performance Measures for School-Based Health Centers: The National Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive literature on school-based health center (SBHC) characteristics and outcomes, their quality of care has not been examined nationally. Standardized quality metrics can inform health care delivery and improvement. METHODS: SBHC national performance measures (NPMs) were developed by reviewing measures from national child health quality initiatives and engaging stakeholders in a consensus-building process. NPMs were pilot-tested with 73 SBHCs and SBHCs nationally subsequently reported data. RESULTS: Five NPMs were selected including the percentage of clients annually who received at least one: (1) well-child visit, whether administered in the SBHC or elsewhere; (2) risk assessment; (3) body mass index screen with nutrition and physical activity counseling; and, if age-appropriate, (4) depression screening with follow-up treatment plan; and (5) chlamydia screening among sexually active clients. SBHCs experienced challenges with reporting during pilot-testing, particularly related to extracting data from electronic health records, and identified strategies to address challenges. Approximately 20% of SBHCs nationally voluntarily reported data during the initial year. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH: Standardized performance measures can help SBHCs monitor and improve care delivery and demonstrate effectiveness compared to other child health delivery systems. CONCLUSION: Ongoing data collection will help examine whether measure adoption drives quality improvement for SBHCs nationwide.

Being on the Safe Side: A Qualitative Study of Condom Use Motivations According to Contraceptive Type among Adolescents in Atlanta, Georgia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Quantitative data suggest that adolescent users of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), compared with short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA]), might be less likely to use condoms. We qualitatively describe and explain adolescent contraceptive users' motivations for condom use, including variation according to contraceptive type. DESIGN: Individual, in-depth qualitative interviews, analyzed thematically. SETTING: Participants were recruited from public family planning clinics and an adolescent medicine clinic, as well as university and other community settings in Atlanta, Georgia. PARTICIPANTS: Sexually active contraceptive users aged 17-19 years old (n = 30), including LARC (n = 10), DMPA (n = 10), and oral contraceptive (n = 10) users. RESULTS: Of the 30 participants, most (n = 25; 83%) used condoms with their more effective contraceptive method, although 11 of 25 used them inconsistently (44%). Oral contraceptive users were particularly motivated to use condoms for pregnancy prevention, because of concerns about contraceptive method efficacy and a desire to be on "the safe side." In contrast, LARC users were primarily motivated by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention. DMPA users' motivations were more mixed. Across contraceptive type, factors influencing condom use motivations included sexual health education, personal awareness and/or experience, and perceived consequences and risk. CONCLUSION: Because all participants were using an effective contraceptive method, it is notable that pregnancy prevention was a prominent motivator for using condoms, although LARC users reported STI prevention to be a more important motivation. Parental and school-based sexual health education that clearly addresses STI prevention in addition to pregnancy prevention has the potential to influence condom use motivations and behavior.

A Web-based review of sexual and reproductive health services available at colleges and universities in Georgia.

OBJECTIVE: Although two-thirds of graduating high school seniors attend college or university in the U.S., there is a paucity of national or state specific research regarding SRH services available on or near college and university campuses. METHODS: A review of websites for all colleges and universities in Georgia was conducted to evaluate sexual health services available on campuses and evidence of referral to community providers. RESULTS: Of 96 colleges in Georgia, 44 had campus-located health centers, with only 3 at two-year colleges. Overall SRH service provision was low, with great variation between colleges. Distances between colleges and Title X clinics ranged from 0.33 to 35.45 miles. CONCLUSIONS: Many students lack access to campus health centers, and information on college websites regarding SRH service availability and referrals differs dramatically between campuses. In the absence of robust campus-located services, schools should highlight where students can obtain comprehensive SRH care in the community.