Effects of two physical therapy interventions in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: feasibility of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain is both a health and a socio-economic problem which is associated with disability as well as with emotional distress. The Mckenzie and Back School's techniques have been shown to be effective in the treatment of this condition. OBJECTIVES: to perform a preliminary analysis of the effects of these treatments in patients with chronic non specific low back pain for the following outcomes: pain, disability and trunk flexion range of motion and to test the feasibility of randomized controlled trial testing these interventions on this population. METHODS: the participants were assessed by a blinded assessor and randomly assigned into one of the treatment groups. The data analysis was performed in only 18 patients and the study is still ongoing, so the results are restricted to these patients, as a single group. RESULTS: the patients improved for the outcomes pain intensity (mean difference of 2.4 points and 95% CI 0.84 to 3.93) and disability (5.2 points and 95% CI 2.55 to 7.78), but no improvement in range of motion in flexion was observed (7.2 degrees 95% CI -1.82 to 16.29). CONCLUSION: the Mckenzie and Back School's approaches may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with chronic non specific low back pain for the outcomes pain intensity and disability. We also concluded that the study is feasible and we will continue performing the current study without any adjustments of the original research protocol. This study was prospectively registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12610000435088.

Effects of two physical therapy interventions in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: feasibility of a randomized controlled trial / Efeitos de duas intervenções fisioterapêuticas em pacientes com dor lombar crônica não-específica: viabilidade de um estudo controlado aleatorizado

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain is both a health and a socio-economic problem which is associated with disability as well as with emotional distress. The Mckenzie and Back School’s techniques have been shown to be effective in the treatment of this condition. OBJECTIVES: to perform a preliminary analysis of the effects of these treatments in patients with chronic non specific low back pain for the following outcomes: pain, disability and trunk flexion range of motion and to test the feasibility of randomized controlled trial testing these interventions on this population. METHODS: the participants were assessed by a blinded assessor and randomly assigned into one of the treatment groups. The data analysis was performed in only 18 patients and the study is still ongoing, so the results are restricted to these patients, as a single group. RESULTS: the patients improved for the outcomes pain intensity (mean difference of 2.4 points and 95 percent CI 0.84 to 3.93) and disability (5.2 points and 95 percent CI 2.55 to 7.78), but no improvement in range of motion in flexion was observed (7.2 degrees 95 percent CI -1.82 to 16.29). CONCLUSION:the Mckenzie and Back School’s approaches may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with chronic non specific low back pain for the outcomes pain intensity and disability. We also concluded that the study is feasible and we will continue performing the current study without any adjustments of the original research protocol. This study was prospectively registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12610000435088.

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: A dor lombar crônica não-específica é um problema de saúde associado à redução do desempenho funcional e a alterações emocionais. Os métodos Back School e Mckenzie têm se mostrado eficazes no tratamento desse sintoma. OBJETIVOS: Realizar uma análise preliminar da eficácia dessas técnicas em pacientes com dor lombar crônica não-específica para os desfechos intensidade da dor, desempenho funcional e amplitude de movimento (ADM) de flexão de coluna e testar a viabilidade da condução de um estudo controlado aleatorizado utilizando essas intervenções nessa população. MÉTODOS: Os indivíduos foram avaliados por um examinador cego e distribuídos aleatoriamente para os grupos de tratamento. A análise dos dados foi realizada em 18 pacientes, e o estudo continua em andamento, portanto os resultados apresentados se referem a esses pacientes como sendo de um só grupo. RESULTADOS:Os pacientes obtiveram melhora nos desfechos intensidade da dor (média das diferenças de 2,4 pontos e IC a 95 por cento - 0,84 a 3,93) e desempenho funcional (5,2 pontos e IC 95 por cento - 2,55 a 7,78), mas não para a ADM de flexão de coluna (7,2 graus e IC 95 por cento - 1,82 a 16,29). CONCLUSÃO: Os métodos Back School e Mckenzie podem ser benéficos no tratamento de indivíduos com dor lombar crônica não-específica. Além disso, concluiu-se que o estudo é viável e continua sem alterações no projeto inicial. Estudo previamente registrado no Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) sob o número ACTRN12610000435088.

Effectiveness of the back school and mckenzie techniques in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a highly prevalent condition, which is associated with high direct and indirect costs to the society. Although this condition is highly prevalent, it is still extremely difficult to treat. Two potentially useful treatments for patients with chronic low back pain are called the McKenzie and Back School treatment programs. These programs have good biological plausibility, are widely available and have a modest cost. Although these treatments are already available for patients, the evidence that supports their use is largely based on low quality methodological studies. Therefore, a high-quality randomised controlled trial is required to compare, for the first time, the effectiveness of these treatments in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and forty-eight patients will be randomly allocated to a four-week treatment program based upon the McKenzie or Back School principles. Clinical outcomes (pain intensity, disability, quality of life, and trunk flexion range of motion) will be obtained at follow-up appointments at 1, 3 and 6 months after randomisation. The data will be collected by an assessor who will be blinded to the group allocation. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study aimed to compare the McKenzie and Back School approaches in patients with chronic low back pain. The results of this trial may help in the decision-making process of allied health providers for the treatment of chronic low back pain and reduce the health-related costs of this condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12610000435088.