Using water footprint concepts for water security assessment of a basin under anthropogenic pressures.

The evaluation of water shortages and pollution levels is crucial for watershed management and sustainable development. This paper proposes a water footprint (WF) sustainability assessment approach to analyse water security in a river basin under human pressures. The methodology involves a comprehensive assessment of the current water security at different spatial and temporal levels, and identifies suitable response formulations to achieve sustainability. Field surveys and measurements (streamflow, water quality) were carried out, and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model was used for assessing water balance components and water quality. The study was carried out in the Canale d'Aiedda river basin (Taranto, Italy), which is part of the 'area of environmental crisis' of Taranto, which requires remediation of surface water, groundwater, soil and subsoil. Considering all the anthropogenic activities in the basin, including agriculture and the treated effluent disposed of via wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the average WF was 213.9 Mm3 y-1, of which 37.2%, 9.2% and 53.6% comprised respectively for WFgreen, WFblue and WFgrey. The WF sustainability assessment revealed that pollution was the main factor affecting surface water security. In particular, point sources contributed with 90% to the total WFgrey, and lower pollutant thresholds should be fixed for effluent from WWTPs in order to increase water quality of the receiving water body. In addition, for assuring water security the extension of the natural areas should be increased to support biodiversity in the river basin and soil management strategies should be improved to allow more water to be retained in the soil and to reduce nutrients in surface runoff. This study demonstrates that the WF sustainability assessment is a feasible approach for integrated water resources management, as well as offering a much broader perspective on how water security can be achieved in a Mediterranean basin affected by multiple anthropogenic stressors.

Coupling the water footprint accounting of crops and in-stream monitoring activities at the catchment scale.

In this work, a simple approach for calibrating the water footprint (WF) accounting of crops with in-stream measurements at the catchment scale was developed. The green and blue components of the WF were evaluated by performing a soil-water balance at a 10-day time-interval. The surface runoff was calibrated based on continuous streamflow measurements. Meanwhile, the grey component of the WF related to nitrogen use was quantified by means of the results from the in-stream monitoring activities. The methodology can be applied to any catchment where soil, land use, weather, agricultural practices, nitrogen balance and stream data are available. This methodological approach can support local authorities in the decision-making process for effective agricultural policy setting and water planning. •The WF accounting for an agricultural catchment is coupled with surface-water monitoring results•The green and blue WF are assessed by performing a soil-water balance•Surface runoff and grey water accounts are based on in-stream monitoring activities.

Characterising the hydrological regime of an ungauged temporary river system: a case study.

Temporary streams are characterised by specific hydrological regimes, which influence ecosystem processes, groundwater and surface water interactions, sediment regime, nutrient delivery, water quality and ecological status. This paper presents a methodology to characterise and classify the regime of a temporary river in Southern Italy based on hydrological indicators (HIs) computed with long-term daily flow records. By using a principal component analysis (PCA), a set of non-redundant indices were identified describing the main characteristics of the hydrological regime in the study area. The indicators identified were the annual maximum 30- and 90-day mean (DH4 and DH5), the number of zero flow days (DL6), flow permanence (MF) and the 6-month seasonal predictability of dry periods (SD6). A methodology was also tested to estimate selected HIs in ungauged river reaches. Watershed characteristics such as catchment area, gauging station elevation, mean watershed slope, mean annual rainfall, land use, soil hydraulic conductivity and available water content were derived for each site. Selected indicators were then linked to the catchment characteristics using a regression analysis. Finally, MF and SD6 were used to classify the river reaches on the basis of their degree of intermittency. The methodology presented in this paper constitutes a useful tool for ecologists and water resource managers in the Water Framework Directive implementation process, which requires a characterisation of the hydrological regime and a 'river type' classification for all water bodies.