Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2024(6): rjae397, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835943

RESUMO

Mucinous appendicular neoplasms are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors, whose treatment may vary based on histologic features and extent. We present a case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm mimicking an acute appendicitis scenario. The patient underwent appendectomy along with resection of the caecal fundus. Choosing the correct treatment according to the case by following current guidelines is crucial to avoid under- or overtreatment.

2.
Transplant Proc ; 51(9): 2927-2930, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malignancy is an important cause of mortality in renal transplants recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, prognosis, and survival of patients developing a de novo post-transplant cancer. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we evaluated the incidence of de novo cancers among kidney transplants patients in our hospital from January 2000 to December 2012. We also evaluated the patient survival after tumor diagnosis. RESULTS: We included 535 kidney transplants recipients with a mean follow-up of 7.8 years; among them, 39 (7.2%) developed malignancies. Median time from transplant to cancer diagnosis was 3 years, with a median age at diagnosis of 60 years. Male patients were significantly older at time of cancer diagnosis (68.5 years) compared with women (38 years, P < .05), and cancer diagnosis occurred significantly earlier in men (3.5 years since transplantation) than in women (8.5 years, P < .05). Among 39 patients affected by a de novo post-transplant cancer, 18 patients (46.2%) died, with an average age at death of 58.5 years. The average time from cancer diagnosis to death was 1.5 years. Among the group of patients who did not develop a post-transplant cancer, 83 patients (16.7%) died, with a median age at time of death of 54.5 years (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients are at higher risk of developing a post-transplant cancer. Prognosis after cancer diagnosis is poor, probably as a consequence of a more aggressive behavior of cancer in transplant recipients. Intensive screening protocols could allow for an earlier diagnosis thereby improving the long-term outcome of these patients.


Assuntos
Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Transplant Proc ; 51(9): 2906-2909, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31543275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A careful assessment of a living donor is mandatory to minimize the short- and long-term risk related to kidney donation. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of incidental findings (IFs) in a large population of potential living kidney donors. Moreover, this study evaluated if the presence of IFs could influence the chance of living kidney donation and post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: One hundred and sixty consecutive potential prospective living kidney transplant donors, who underwent a multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA), were included in the study. An IF was defined as an incidentally discovered mass or lesion, detected by computed tomography angiography during the imaging evaluation of potential living donors. Clinical outcomes of living donors with IF were compared with those without IF. RESULTS: In 10 patients (6.2%) an incidental finding was detected at MDCTA assessment. Among the 10 patients presenting with an IF, 7 patients (4.3%) were excluded from the living donation: 2 patients with an adrenal lesion, 3 patients with cancer, and 2 patients with a large (>8 cm) renal cyst. Graft and patient survival of kidney transplant recipients of donors with IFs were not significantly different to those receiving a kidney from living donors without IFs. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings are frequently discovered during living kidney donor evaluation. Whereas most are asymptomatic or not clinically relevant, predonation screening could identify potentially life-threatening diseases at an earlier stage, allowing for a more radical treatment.


Assuntos
Achados Incidentais , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim , Doadores Vivos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores Vivos/provisão & distribuição , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...