Characteristics of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a debilitating autoimmune disease characterized by ocular and periorbital tissue inflammation, proptosis, and visual impairment. The known risk factors for TED include radioactive iodine therapy, female sex, and smoking. The risk factors for severe TED include hyperthyroidism, male sex, smoking, and diabetes; however, little is known about how diabetes mellitus (DM) influences TED. This claims-based analysis examined TED characteristics in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Symphony database (2010-2015 U.S. claims) was mined for patients with ≥1 Graves' disease diagnosis code and ≥1 TED-associated eye code, including proptosis, strabismus, diplopia, lid retraction, exposure keratoconjunctivitis, and optic neuropathy (ON). DM status was determined based on type 1 or type 2 diabetes coding. Sight-threatening TED was defined as ≥1 ON or exposure keratoconjunctivitis code. RESULTS: A total of 51 220 patients were identified. Of them, 2618 (5.1%) and 12 846 (25.1%) had type 1 and type 2 DM, respectively. Patients with and without DM had similar characteristics, but patients with DM were more often men (type 1: 30.3%, type 2: 28.7% vs no DM: 20.5%; both P < .001) and older at the first TED code. In patients with DM, strabismus (25.4%, 22.6% vs 19.9%) and diplopia (38.6%, 37.9% vs 29.9%) occurred more often but proptosis occurred less often (42.3%, 46.3% vs 58.5%; all P < .001). Sight-threatening TED occurred more often in patients with DM because of higher ON rates. CONCLUSION: Patients with TED and DM may have more extraocular muscle involvement. Furthermore, the higher prevalence of severe TED stemmed from higher ON rates, possibly associated with diabetes-related vasculopathies. These hypothesis-generating data warrant further exploration.

Considerations for Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Patients During Hospitalization: A Narrative Review of What We Need to Know in the Age of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs.

With the availability of second-generation basal insulin analogs, insulin degludec (100 and 200 units/ml [degludec]) and insulin glargine 300 units/ml (glargine U300), clinicians now have long-acting, efficacious treatment options with stable pharmacokinetic profiles and associated low risks of hypoglycemia that may be desirable for many patients with type 2 diabetes. In this narrative review, we summarize the current evidence on glycemic control in hospitalized patients and review the pharmacokinetic properties of degludec and glargine U300 in relation to the challenges these may pose during the hospitalization of patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving outpatient regimens involving these newer insulins. Their increased use in clinical practice requires that hospital healthcare professionals (HCPs) have appropriate protocols to transfer patients from these second-generation insulins to formulary insulin on admission, and ensure the safe discharge of patients and transition back to degludec or glargine U300. However, there is no guidance available on this. Based on the authors' clinical experience, we identify key issues to consider when arranging hospital care of such patients. We also summarize the limited available evidence on the potential utility of these second-generation basal insulin analogs in the non-critical inpatient setting and identify avenues for future research. To address current knowledge gaps, it is important that HCPs are educated about the differences between standard formulary insulins and second-generation insulins, and the importance of clear communication during patient transitions.