Treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the treatment patterns according to the type of treatment received by patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter study performed by 33 sites throughout Spain that included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had received or were receiving treatment for mCRC. RESULTS: At the time of inclusion, of the 873 evaluable patients, 507 (58%) had received two lines, 235 (27%) had received three lines, 106 (12%) had received four lines, and the remaining patients had received up to ten lines. The most frequent chemotherapy schemes were the FOLFOX or CAPOX regimens (66%) for first-line treatment, FOLFOX, CAPOX or FOLFIRI (70%) for second-line treatment, and FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or other fluoropyrimidine-based regimens for third- and fourth-line (over 60%) treatment. Sixty percent of patients received targeted therapy as part of their first-line treatment, and this proportion increased up to approximately 70% of patients as part of the second-line of treatment. A relevant proportion of patients were treated with unknown KRAS, and especially the BRAF, mutation statuses. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals inconsistencies regarding adherence to the recommendations of the ESMO guidelines for the management of mCRC in Spain. Improved adherence to the standard practice described in such guidelines for the determination of RAS and BRAF mutation statuses and the use of targeted therapies in first-line treatment should be considered to guarantee that patients can benefit from the best therapeutic approaches available.

The burden of cancer in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer imposes a huge financial burden in all developed countries. This study estimates the burden of cancer in Spain in 2015. METHODS: The most recent available epidemiological data on prevalence, incidence and mortality, and the economic data on direct (hospital, drugs, and primary care) and indirect (productivity) costs was used from the social perspective. RESULTS: Prevalence, incidence, and mortality were, respectively, 1240, 478, and 218 per 100,000 inhabitants. Mortality was higher for men, while disability rates were higher for women. Direct costs accounted for 4818 million euros and indirect costs were 640 million euros in 2015. Direct costs were almost completely borne by the hospital (94%). Total burden of cancer in Spain was 5458 million euros in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the costs of cancer were mainly borne by the hospital and these costs might increase in the future due to the expected increase in longevity. Further research would be needed to investigate whether it is possible to redistribute the economic burden of cancer.

Oncologist's knowledge and implementation of guidelines for breakthrough cancer pain in Spain: CONOCE study.

PURPOSE: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) has been shown to be a prevalent and poor prognostic factor for oncologic patients, which remain under diagnosed and undertreated. In 2012, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the treatment of cancer pain which specifically addressed the management of BTcP. METHODS: Fundación ECO designed a qualitative study using an Internet-based survey to investigate the attitudes toward, compliance with, and use of SEOM Guideline. RESULTS: A total of 83 oncologists with a mean experience of 13 years responded. Overall, 82% were aware of different guidelines to manage BTcP. Notably, attitudes toward guidelines were highly positive and there was nearly unanimous agreement that CPG provided the best scientific evidence available (99%), on the minimum information to be gathered for the medical history (100%), on the need for a specific treatment for BTcP (100%), and fentanyl as the first-choice drug (99%). Interestingly, there were discrepancies between what oncologists agreed with and what they do in clinical practice. In fact, 87.6% declare full compliance with SEOM guideline, although adherence to registration of BTcP data in medical records ranged from 30.1 to 91.6% (mean 64.5%); therapeutic management compliance was higher ranging from 75.9 to 91.6%. Main barriers identified were time pressure together with vague statements and limited dissemination of the guidelines. CONCLUSION: Despite oncologist's clinical practice is increasingly guided by GPC, it suffers from limited compliance, at least in part due to suboptimal statements. Improved dissemination and education are needed to enhance guideline implementation.

European edition of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines: relevance of the translation and adaptation into Spanish.

The NCCN-evidence-based oncology guidelines are consensus-based management documents, to ensure that all patients receive the most appropriate diagnosis, treatment and support services to achieve the best results. However, the use of these guidelines for decision-making by physicians in Spain is sometimes controversial, as treatments or diagnostic procedures are recommended which might not be authorised in our country, or other management options may exist. In March 2015, the ECO Foundation reached an agreement to translate and adapt the NCCN's clinical practice guidelines in oncology for the Spanish sector. Consequently, ECO is the first European organization to reach an agreement of this type with the NCCN. This agreement will allow all agents involved in managing the cancer patients to have available guidelines that are adapted to the specific needs of Spain.

A 50-gene signature is a novel scoring system for tumor-infiltrating immune cells with strong correlation with clinical outcome of stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To identify a novel system for scoring intratumoral immune response that can improve prognosis and therapy decisions in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS/PATIENTS: Eighty-four completely resected stage I/II NSCLC without adjuvant therapy were classified by expression profiling using whole genome microarrays. An external cohort of 162 tumors was used to validate the results. Immune cells present in tumor microenvironment were evaluated semiquantitatively by CD20, CD79, CD3, CD8, CD4 and CD57 immunostaining. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables associated with recurrence-free survival were performed. RESULTS: Initial molecular classification identified three clusters, one with significantly better RFS. A reduced two-subgroup classification and a 50-gene predictor were built and validated in an external dataset: high and low risk of recurrence patients (HR = 3.44; p = 0.001). Analysis of the predictor´s genes showed that the vast majority were related to a B/plasma cell immune response overexpressed in the low-risk subgroup. The predictor includes genes coding for unique B lineage-specific genes, functional elements or other genes that, although non-restricted to this lineage, have strong influence on B-cell homeostasis. Immunostains confirmed increased B-cells in the low-risk subgroup. Gene signature (p < 0.0001) and CD20 (p < 0.05) were predictors for RFS, while CD79 and K-RAS mutations showed a tendency. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable prognosis in completely resected NSCLC is determined by a B-cell-mediated immune response. It can be differently scored by a 50-gene expression profile or by CD20 immunostaining. That prognosis information not reflected by traditional classifications may become a new tool for determining individualized adjuvant therapies.

Social value of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Spain: the point of view of oncologists.

PURPOSE: The economic situation showed that the resources devoted to health spending are limited, making rationalisation of their consumption necessary. The relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses is becoming crucial. The ECO Foundation, promoting the quality of oncology care, set out to analyse the consensus on the new therapeutic targets inclusion and the integration of pharmacoeconomics when evaluating their effectiveness. METHODS: Study about pharmacoeconomic estimations was performed during the first ECO-Seminar (2010). It was developed using a modified Delphi method, in four stages: (1) committee coordinator establishment, (2) expert-panel selection, (3) preparation and submission of survey (1 question) by email, and (4) analysis of the degree of consensus reached. RESULTS: Results were obtained from surveys completed by 35 experts. Regarding the tolerable annual cost for the approval of new drugs, 68.8 % of the respondents considered a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained between €30,000 and 100,000 acceptable (34.4 % €30,000-60,000; 34.4 % €60,000-100,000), 21.9 % of the respondents found costs between €100,000-150,000/QALY and 9.3 % of the respondents found costs above €150,000/QALY acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of new drugs are higher than traditional treatments, making it a priority to identify subgroups of patients with specific molecular profiles as candidates for higher-efficiency-targeted therapies. The allocation of the available resources to the most effective interventions, to achieve the best clinical outcomes with lower costs and best subjective profile possible, allows expenditure to be rationalised. Pharmacoeconomic studies are a basic tool for obtaining better health outcomes according to the available resources, while also considering the other needs of the population.

TTD consensus document on the diagnosis and management of exocrine pancreatic cancer.

Exocrine pancreatic cancer (PC) is a very aggressive and heterogeneous tumor with several cellular signaling pathways implicated in its pathogenesis and maintenance. Several risk factors increase the risk of developing PC. Therapeutic strategies used are dictated by the extent of disease. Supportive treatment is critical because of the high frequency of symptoms. For localized disease, surgery followed by adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard. Neoadjuvant and new adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are being evaluated. Locally advanced disease should respond best guided by a multidisciplinary team. Various treatment options are appropriate such as chemotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with integration of rescue surgery if the tumor becomes resectable. In metastatic disease, chemotherapy should be reserved for patients with ECOG 0-1 using Folfirinox or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as the most recommended options. Several therapeutic strategies targeting unregulated pathways are under evaluation with an unmet need for biomarkers to guide management.

Assignment of tumor subtype by genomic testing and pathologic-based approximations: implications on patient's management and therapy selection.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer subtypes can be identified by genomic testing or pathology-based approximations. However, these classifications are not equivalent and the clinical relevance of both classifications needs to be fully explored. METHODS: Ninety-four patients were randomized to neoadjuvant single agent doxorubicin or docetaxel. Tumor subtype was assessed by pathology-based classification and by gene expression using the PAM50 plus the claudin-low predictor (CLP). Kappa Cohen's coefficient (κ) was used to test the agreement between methods. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine the significance of each methodology in the prediction of prognosis. Likelihood ratio statistics of both classifications were evaluated. RESULTS: The agreement between pathology-based classification and PAM50 was moderate [κ = 0.551, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.467-0.641]. Tumor subtype assessed by both classifications were prognostic for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (P < 0.05). However, PAM50 + CLP provided more prognostic information, in terms of OS, than the pathology-based classification (P < 0.05). Patients with triple negative tumors as well as basal-like tumors had worse OS when first treated with doxorubicin (HR = 5.98, 95 % CI 1.25-28.67, and HR = 5.02, 95 % CI 0.96-26.38, respectively). However, claudin-low tumors did not show significant differences in OS according to neoadjuvant treatment branch. Indeed, we found that claudin-low tumors treated with pre-operative doxorubicin had significantly better OS than basal-like tumors treated with neoadjuvant doxorubicin (adjusted HR = 0.16, 95 % CI 0.04-0.69, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The assignment of tumor subtype can differ depending on the methodology, which might have implications on patient's management and therapy selection.

Oncological translational research in the Spanish national health system: the INTRO study.

OBJECTIVES: Under the auspices of the Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology (ECO), the Translational Research in Oncology Medical Services Study (INTRO) was conducted with the aim of describing the current state of, and future expectations for translational cancer research in Spanish medical centres. The first step in the investigation was intended to analyse the current condition of the national Medical Oncology Services network by examining different aspects of the oncology research field. METHODS: A descriptive and observational multicentre study was performed at a statewide level; information was collected by surveying a cross-section of all those responsible for Medical Oncology Services in Spain. RESULTS: The survey was completed by key informants, who were selected independently by each service, between September 2010 and April 2011. We were able to gather comprehensive data from a total of 27 Spanish hospitals. These data enabled us to describe the allocation of human and material resources devoted to clinical and translational research across the Medical Oncology Services and to describe the organisational and functional components of these services and units. These data included information pertaining to the activities developed, their funding sources, and their functional dependence on other internal or external bodies. Finally, we explored the degree of dissemination and use of some specific techniques used for the genetic diagnosis of cancer, which have recently been introduced in Medical Oncology within the Spanish healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of variability exists between different oncology services in Spanish hospitals. Time should be spent reflecting on the need and opportunities for improvement in the development of translational research within the field of oncology.

Recommendations and expert opinion on the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain.

In Spain 22,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year, with 13,075 deaths resulting from this disease. Around 70% of colorectal cancers are localised in the colon and 30% in the rectum. A group of Spanish experts established recommendations on what would be the best strategy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Adequate assessment of local tumour extension, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound, is essential for successful treatment. The three cornerstones in the treatment of LARC are surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most patients will need a total mesorectal excision (TME). Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is preferred for the majority of patients with T3/T4 disease and/or regional node involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after a patient-sharing decision. Capecitabine, after showing a trend in improved downstaging in neoadjuvant stratum and the convenience of its oral administration, represents an alternative to 5-FU as perioperative treatment of LARC.

Recommendations and expert opinion on the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in Spain.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard in the management of patients with localised colon cancer (CC) following curative resection. The use of oxaliplatin plus 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine-based (XELOX) regimens, both approved in Europe as adjuvant treatment for stage III CC, has improved prognosis in this stage, but questions on their usefulness in high-risk stage II or elderly CC patients and on the role of some prognostic biomarkers are still pending. In April 2010, a consensus meeting on adjuvant CC treatment based on a revision of the most recent literature was held in Spain. The panel considered the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II CC patients to be justified. Additionally, the more convenient administration of oral fluoropyrimidines vs. IV continuous infusion 5-FU would make XELOX a more suitable alternative for the patient. A more cautious decision should be taken when prescribing oxaliplatin treatment in patients aged ≥70.

Consensus on the treatment of pancreatic cancer in Spain.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents one of the greatest oncological challenges of our century, due to its high mortality and incidence. A group of Spanish experts in PC treatment reviewed data available on different therapeutic combinations and established consensus on what would be the best strategy in PC management, depending on the stage of the disease. Surgery with complete resection may produce 5-year survival rates of 18-24%, but definitive control is still precarious. In the absence of consensus, the best evidence suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine for 6 months using the CONKO-001 regime is the treatment of choice after resection of PC for patients with acceptable functional status. This group recommends chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in patients with factors for poor loco-regional prognosis. However, chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of locally advanced PC in patients with good general status and in the absence of metastatic disease the recommended treatment is CT-RT followed by gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. A period of chemotherapy followed by consolidation CT-RT may be appropriate, as it allows selection of patients with locally advanced disease who may benefit most from combined treatment. Erlotinib combined with gemcitabine shows significant survival improvement in PC and must be considered an option in the first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic PC. The gemcitabine-erlotinib combination is proposed as the standard treatment for metastatic PC in patients with PS=/>2. In patients with PS<2, gemcitabine-erlotinib is recommended as the first-line treatment option, supported by a maximum degree of evidence, without ruling out other options, such as gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, gemcitabine-capecitabine or gemcitabine alone.

Successful rectal cancer local recurrence radiofrequency ablation.

Local rectal cancer recurrences represent a great challenge, as surgical re-excisions or re-irradiation procedures are not always feasible. Moreover, scar or local recurrence is hard to elucidate with conventional diagnosis techniques. Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic procedures may be useful in this setting. A local rectal cancer recurrence radiofrequency ablation is reported. PET scan confirmed the recurrence, defined the target volume and assessed the success of the local therapy.

Guidelines for the detection and treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

The spread of the surgical treatment for hepatic metastases have been crucial in the improvement of treatment and survival of metastatic colorectal cancer. The early and accurate diagnosis of metastases and the assessment of their size are essential factors to reach the optimal results with this treatment strategy. The precise indication of the surgical technique with or without the previous administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of significant importance for the choice of R0 surgery and the timing of intervention. Although there is an agreement regarding some parameters related to diagnosis techniques and surgical criteria such as the bilobar extension, the size of the remaining liver post-surgical removal and the indication of pre-operatory chemotherapy, it is necessary to consider all these factors to set up standard criteria and optimize the results. In this article we review all these parameters, from disease follow up to detect metastatic dissemination to the basic criteria for use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in order to suggest some general recommendations of evidence level II and recommendation grade A.

Pathological complete response following docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma has a poor outcome. Neoadjuvant treatment is being tested in locally advanced non-resectable tumours and in those resectable tumours with a high risk of recurrence. Efforts to identify prognostic factors and more active and less toxic preoperative regimens are being searched for. We report the case of a patient achieving a complete histopathological complete response following docetaxel- based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Guides for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. TTD Group (Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy).

The choice of the most suitable chemotherapy schedule for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer has been reviewed by the TTD group, as well as the principles of risk assessment for patients with stage II disease. In the light of data now available, oxaliplatin- based schedules (FOLFOX4 or FLOX) are recommended. Alternatives in special situations are monotherapy with capecitabine, UFT/LV, or 5- FU/LV in infusion. In patients with stage II disease, the indication of chemotherapy must be individualized and based on the patient's risk of recurrence (perforation, obstruction, peritumoral lymphovascular involvement, poorly differentiated histology, number of lymph nodes examined < or = 11, pre-surgical CEA), and comorbidities that can compromise the safety of treatment or survival of the patient.

Cuirasse skin metastases secondary to gastric adenocarcinoma.

Skin metastases are infrequent manifestations of solid tumours. However, it is important to recognize them since they may be the first evidence of a neoplasia, or a sign of tumour progression or recurrence. Skin metastases from gastric adenocarcinomas are particularly rare, and represent 6% of the total in males and 1% in females. We report, here, the case of a patient diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma with extensive subcutaneous infiltration of the abdominal wall, resulting in an abdominal cuirass.