Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings in Primary Open-Angle and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma.

Objectives: To compare the optical disc and macular vascular density values of patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals by using optical coherence tomography angiography and evaluate the relationship between structural and functional test results and vascular density. Materials and Methods: The study included 128 eyes in total: 31 with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG), 55 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and similar visual field defects, and 42 healthy eyes. Whole image peripapillary vessel density (wpVD), intradisc vessel density (idVD), peripapillary vessel density (pVD), whole image macular vessel density (wmVD), and parafoveal vessel density (pfVD) values were compared between the groups. Correlations between visual field findings, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve head measurements and peripapillary and macular vascular density were analyzed. Results: In the PEG and POAG groups, wpVD, idVD, wmVD, and pfVD values were significantly lower in than the control group. In the PEG group, wpVD was found to be significantly lower than the POAG group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the PEG and POAG groups in wmVD and pfVD except for nasal pfVD. There were strong positive correlations between RNFL thickness and pVD in the glaucoma groups (p<0.001). Significant correlations were found between visual field mean deviation and pattern standard deviation values and peripapillary and macular vessel density values in the glaucoma groups. Conclusion: Vascular density values were lower in glaucoma patients compared to normal individuals, and there is a strong correlation between structural and functional tests and vessel density values. The lower vascular density in the PEG group compared to the POAG group indicates that vascular damage may be more common in PEG patients.

Corneal Pathology and Cataract: Combined Surgery or Sequential Surgery?

Objectives: To compare our combined surgery (CS) and sequential surgery (SS) results. Materials and Methods: The files of 44 patients who underwent CS (penetrating keratoplasty [PK], cataract extraction, and intraocular lens [IOL] implantation) and 126 patients who underwent SS (cataract extraction and IOL implantation in a second session after PK) between January 2009 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. One eye of the patients who were followed up for at least 1 year was included in the study. The two groups were compared in terms of indications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive results, complications, and graft survival. Results: In the CS and SS groups, the median age was 63 (30-79) and 43 (18-73) years (p<0.001) and the median follow-up time was 51 (13-152) and 64.5 (13-154) months (p=0.011), respectively. The most common PK indications were traumatic corneal scar (20.5%) and endothelial dystrophy (15.9%) in the CS group versus keratoconus (24.6%) and stroma dystrophy (17.5%) in the SS group. In the CS and SS groups, 50% vs 69% of patients had CDVA ≥0.4 (p=0.04); 45.5% vs 25.4% had CDVA (0.1-0.3) (p=0.04); and 54.5% vs 73% had spherical equivalent ≤±2.0 D (p=0.02). The most common postoperative complications were glaucoma (20.5% vs 15.9%, p=0.48) and allograft reaction (9.1% vs 23%, p=0.04). Graft survival rates were 95.2% vs 86.5% (p=0.10) at 1 year and 75.9% vs 68.9% (p=0.47) at 5 years, respectively. Conclusion: Over long-term follow-up, the groups were similar in terms of graft survival. For this reason, each patient must be evaluated separately whether to perform a combined or sequential surgery. Given the lower refractive error and higher expectation of final visual acuity, SS can be more advantageous especially in young patients.