Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 20(4): 436-40, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19017335

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. METHODS: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. RESULTS: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (<30 g) pressures (75% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of lesions using >40 g of pressure demonstrated "popping" and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20-30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in "relative" sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. CONCLUSIONS: When using an OIC, lower power settings (

Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Endocárdio/lesões , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Robótica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Animais , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Cães , Endocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Cardíacos/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Teste de Materiais , Pressão , Medição de Risco , Estresse Mecânico , Ultrassonografia
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 19(6): 641-4, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18373604

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of luminal temperature during left atrial ablation is used clinically; however, luminal temperature does not necessarily reflect temperature within the esophageal wall and poses a risk of atrioesophageal fistula. This animal study evaluates luminal esophageal temperature and its relation to the temperature of the external esophageal tissue during left atrial lesions using the 8 mm solid tip and the open irrigated tip catheters (OIC). METHODS AND RESULTS: A thermocouple was secured to the external surface of the esophagus at the level of the left atrium of the dogs. Luminal esophageal temperature was measured using a standard temperature probe. In four randomized dogs, lesions were placed using an 8 mm solid tip ablation catheter. In six randomized dogs, lesions were placed using the 3.5 mm OIC. The average peak esophageal tissue temperature when using the OIC was significantly higher than that of the 8 mm tip catheter (88.6 degrees C +/- 15.0 degrees C vs. 62.3 degrees C +/- 12.5 degrees C, P < 0.05). Both OIC and 8 mm tip catheter had significantly higher peak tissue temperatures than luminal temperatures (OIC: 88.6 degrees C +/- 15.0 degrees C vs 39.7 degrees C +/- 0.82 degrees C, P < 0.05) (8 mm: 62.3 degrees C +/- 12.5 degrees C vs 39.0 +/- 0.5 degrees C, P < 0.05). Both catheters achieved peak temperatures faster in the tissue as compared to the lumen of the esophagus, although the tissue temperature peaked significantly faster for the OIC (OIC: 25 seconds vs 90 seconds, P < 0.05) (8 mm: 63 seconds vs 105 seconds, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the significant difference in actual tissue temperatures, no significant difference was observed in luminal temperatures between the OIC and 8 mm tip catheter.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Temperatura Corporal/fisiologia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Esôfago/fisiopatologia , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/instrumentação , Animais , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Cães , Seguimentos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Termômetros
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...