ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review.

The recent release of ChatGPT, a chat bot research project/product of natural language processing (NLP) by OpenAI, stirs up a sensation among both the general public and medical professionals, amassing a phenomenally large user base in a short time. This is a typical example of the 'productization' of cutting-edge technologies, which allows the general public without a technical background to gain firsthand experience in artificial intelligence (AI), similar to the AI hype created by AlphaGo (DeepMind Technologies, UK) and self-driving cars (Google, Tesla, etc.). However, it is crucial, especially for healthcare researchers, to remain prudent amidst the hype. This work provides a systematic review of existing publications on the use of ChatGPT in healthcare, elucidating the 'status quo' of ChatGPT in medical applications, for general readers, healthcare professionals as well as NLP scientists. The large biomedical literature database PubMed is used to retrieve published works on this topic using the keyword 'ChatGPT'. An inclusion criterion and a taxonomy are further proposed to filter the search results and categorize the selected publications, respectively. It is found through the review that the current release of ChatGPT has achieved only moderate or 'passing' performance in a variety of tests, and is unreliable for actual clinical deployment, since it is not intended for clinical applications by design. We conclude that specialized NLP models trained on (bio)medical datasets still represent the right direction to pursue for critical clinical applications.

Information extraction from weakly structured radiological reports with natural language queries.

OBJECTIVES: Provide physicians and researchers an efficient way to extract information from weakly structured radiology reports with natural language processing (NLP) machine learning models. METHODS: We evaluate seven different German bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models on a dataset of 857,783 unlabeled radiology reports and an annotated reading comprehension dataset in the format of SQuAD 2.0 based on 1223 additional reports. RESULTS: Continued pre-training of a BERT model on the radiology dataset and a medical online encyclopedia resulted in the most accurate model with an F1-score of 83.97% and an exact match score of 71.63% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy in detecting unanswerable questions. Fine-tuning a non-medical model without further pre-training led to the lowest-performing model. The final model proved stable against variation in the formulations of questions and in dealing with questions on topics excluded from the training set. CONCLUSIONS: General domain BERT models further pre-trained on radiological data achieve high accuracy in answering questions on radiology reports. We propose to integrate our approach into the workflow of medical practitioners and researchers to extract information from radiology reports. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: By reducing the need for manual searches of radiology reports, radiologists' resources are freed up, which indirectly benefits patients. KEY POINTS: • BERT models pre-trained on general domain datasets and radiology reports achieve high accuracy (83.97% F1-score) on question-answering for radiology reports. • The best performing model achieves an F1-score of 83.97% for answerable questions and 96.01% accuracy for questions without an answer. • Additional radiology-specific pretraining of all investigated BERT models improves their performance.