Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastroenterology ; 2024 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy-based surveillance to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) causes substantial burden for patients and health care. Stool tests may help to reduce surveillance colonoscopies by limiting colonoscopies to individuals at increased risk of advanced neoplasia. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included individuals aged 50-75 years with surveillance indication. Before bowel preparation, participants collected samples for a multitarget stool DNA test and 2 fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Test accuracy was calculated for all surveillance indications. For the post-polypectomy indication only, which is the most common and is associated with a relatively low CRC risk, long-term impact of stool-based surveillance was evaluated with the Adenoma and Serrated Pathway to Colorectal Cancer model. Stool-based strategies were simulated to tune each test's positivity threshold to obtain strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance. RESULTS: There were 3453 individuals with results for all stool tests and colonoscopy; 2226 had previous polypectomy, 1003 had previous CRC, and 224 had a familial risk. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for advanced neoplasia were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) for the multitarget stool DNA test, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.58-0.64) for the FIT OC-SENSOR (Eiken Chemical Co, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56-0.61) for the FIT FOB-Gold (Sentinel, Milan, Italy). Stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance reduced the number of colonoscopies by 15%-41% and required 5.6-9.5 stool tests over a person's lifetime. Multitarget stool DNA-based surveillance was more costly than colonoscopy surveillance, whereas FIT-based surveillance saved costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies can be safe and cost-effective, with potential to reduce the number of colonoscopies by up to 41%. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT02715141.

2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 15(12): 3990-7, 2009 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19509152

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The transcription factors GATA4 and GATA5 are involved in gastrointestinal development and are inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Here, we evaluated GATA4/5 promoter methylation as potential biomarkers for noninvasive colorectal cancer detection, and investigated the role of GATA4/5 in colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Promoter methylation of GATA4/5 was analyzed in colorectal tissue and fecal DNA from colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls using methylation-specific PCR. The potential function of GATA4/5 as tumor suppressors was studied by inducing GATA4/5 overexpression in human colorectal cancer cell lines. RESULTS: GATA4/5 methylation was observed in 70% (63/90) and 79% (61/77) of colorectal carcinomas, respectively, and was independent of clinicopathologic features. Methylation frequencies in normal colon tissues from noncancerous controls were 6% (5 of 88, GATA4; P < 0.001) and 13% (13 of 100, GATA5; P < 0.001). GATA4/5 overexpression suppressed colony formation (P < 0.005), proliferation (P < 0.001), migration (P < 0.05), invasion (P < 0.05), and anchorage-independent growth (P < 0.0001) of colorectal cancer cells. Examination of GATA4 methylation in fecal DNA from two independent series of colorectal cancer patients and controls yielded a sensitivity of 71% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 55-88%] and specificity of 84% (95% CI, 74-95%) for colorectal cancer detection in the training set, and a sensitivity of 51% (95% CI, 37-65%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI, 84-100%) in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: Methylation of GATA4/5 is a common and specific event in colorectal carcinomas, and GATA4/5 exhibit tumor suppressive effects in colorectal cancer cells in vitro. GATA4 methylation in fecal DNA may be of interest for colorectal cancer detection.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Metilação de DNA , Fator de Transcrição GATA4/genética , Fator de Transcrição GATA5/genética , Genes Supressores de Tumor , Carcinoma/genética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Ilhas de CpG/genética , Ilhas de CpG/fisiologia , Fezes/química , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 101(13): 916-27, 2009 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19535783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identification of hypermethylated tumor suppressor genes in body fluids is an appealing strategy for the noninvasive detection of colorectal cancer. Here we examined the role of N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4 (NDRG4) as a novel tumor suppressor and biomarker in colorectal cancer. METHODS: NDRG4 promoter methylation was analyzed in human colorectal cancer cell lines, colorectal tissue, and noncancerous colon mucosa by using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and bisulfite sequencing. NDRG4 mRNA and protein expression were studied using real-time-PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Tumor suppressor functions of NDRG4 were examined by colony formation, cell proliferation, and migration and invasion assays in colorectal cancer cell lines that were stably transfected with an NDRG4 expression construct. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR was used to examine the utility of NDRG4 promoter methylation as a biomarker in fecal DNA from 75 colorectal cancer patients and 75 control subjects. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The prevalence of NDRG4 promoter methylation in two independent series of colorectal cancers was 86% (71/83) and 70% (128/184) compared with 4% (2/48) in noncancerous colon mucosa (P < .001). NDRG4 mRNA and protein expression were decreased in colorectal cancer tissue compared with noncancerous colon mucosa. NDRG4 overexpression in colorectal cancer cell lines suppressed colony formation (P = .014), cell proliferation (P < .001), and invasion (P < .001). NDRG4 promoter methylation analysis in fecal DNA from a training set of colorectal cancer patients and control subjects yielded a sensitivity of 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43% to 79%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI = 90% to 97%). An independent test set of colorectal cancer patients and control subjects yielded a sensitivity of 53% (95% CI = 39% to 67%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI = 86% to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: NDRG4 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer whose expression is frequently inactivated by promoter methylation. NDRG4 promoter methylation is a potential biomarker for the noninvasive detection of colorectal cancer in stool samples.


Assuntos
Adenoma/química , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma/química , Neoplasias Colorretais/química , Metilação de DNA , Fezes/química , Genes Supressores de Tumor , Mucosa Intestinal/química , Proteínas Musculares/análise , Proteínas Musculares/genética , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/análise , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/genética , Adenoma/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/genética , Carcinoma/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Prevalência , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , RNA Mensageiro/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ensaio Tumoral de Célula-Tronco , Regulação para Cima
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA