Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatr Danub ; 32(1): 78-83, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the co-morbidity between Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Schizophrenia (SZ) among a large number of patients describing their clinical characteristics and rate of prevalence. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort-study was carried out on 396 patients affected by MDD and SZ who consecutively attended the Department of Psychiatry, Rumeilah Hospital in Qatar. We employed the World Health Organization - Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WHO-CIDI) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) for diagnoses. Patients were also grouped in MDD patients with and without co-morbid SZ (MDD vs MDD/SZ) for comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 396 subjects were interviewed. MDD patients with comorbid SZ (146(36.8%)) were 42.69±14.33 years old whereas MDD without SZ patients (250 (63.2%)) aged 41.59±13.59. Statistically significant differences between MDD with SZ patients and MDD without SZ patients were: higher BMI (Body Mass Index) (p=0.025), lower family income (p=0.004), higher rate of cigarette smoking (p<0.001), and higher level of consanguinity (p=0.023). Also, statistically significant differences were found in General Health Score (p=0.017), Clinical Global Impression-BD Score (p=0.042), duration of illnesses (p=0.003), and Global Assessment of Functioning (p=0.012). Rates of anxiety dimensions (e.g.: general anxiety, agoraphobia, somatisation, etc.), mood dimensions (e.g.: major depression, mania, oppositional defiant behaviour, Bipolar disorder), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, psychotic and personality dimensions were higher among MDD with SZ patients than MDD without SZ. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that MDD with SZ is a common comorbidity especially among patients reporting higher level of consanguinity. MDD/SZ comorbidity presents unfavourable clinical characteristics and higher levels of morbidity at rating scales.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência
2.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 37: 80-84, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric co-morbidity is a common condition, partly due to the overlap of symptoms in the categorical diagnosis of mental disorders. The co-occurrence of schizophrenia (SZ) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common and challenging co-morbid condition. Also, the relationship between SZ and OCD remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the co-morbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among schizophrenia (SZ) patients and compare clinical characteristics of schizophrenia patients with versus without comorbid OCD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort-study was carried out on 396 patients enrolled between November 2011 to June 2014 at the Department of Psychiatry, Rumeilah Hospital in Qatar. We employed the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WHO-CIDI), and Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) for diagnoses, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Symptom Checklist for scoring OCD. Patients were grouped in SZ patients with and without comorbid OCD (SZ-OCD vs SZ). RESULTS: 396 subjects were interviewed. Age of SZ-OCD patients was 42.69 ± 14.33 (years old) whereas SZ patients without OCD ranged 41.59 ± 13.59 years old. There were statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics between SZ with and without OCD : age (p = 0.010), BMI (body mass index; p = 0.011), education (p = 0.033), employment (p = 0.019), cigarette smoking (p = 0.039), sheesha smoking (p = 0.008), and prevalence of consanguinity (p = 0.043). In particular, the rate of consanguinity in the current generation was 31.8% [95% CI = 29.1-34.7]. Also, there were statistically significant differences at Hamilton Depression score, General Health Score, Clinical Global Impression- Score, duration of illnesses, and Global Assessment of Functioning (p < 0.001). The results show that anxious, mood and psychotic dimensions rated higher among SZ - OCD ones than SZ only patients. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that SZ-OCD is a common co-morbidity and prevalence of SZ OCD is higher among patients reporting a degree of consanguinity. Even if this condition is under-recognized in clinical practice, it may significantly change SZ presentation and outcome since psychopathological dimensions report higher scores in the co-morbidity sample.


Assuntos
Consanguinidade , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/fisiopatologia , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/epidemiologia , Catar/epidemiologia , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia
3.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 13: 793-801, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28352179

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The elderly population is increasing around the world, and the prevalence of dementia increases with age. Hence, it is expected that the number of people with dementia will increase significantly in the coming years. The Mini-Mental Status Examination - 2 (MMSE-2) and Mini-Cog are widely used tests to screen for dementia. These scales have good reliability and validity and are easy to administer in clinical and research settings. AIM: The purpose of this study was to validate the Arabic versions of MMSE-2 and Mini-Cog. These scales were assessed against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for dementia, as the gold standard. METHODS: The standard versions of the MMSE-2 and Mini-Cog were translated to Arabic following the back-translation method. Then, a trained rater administered these tests to 134 Arab elderly aged >60 years. A physician, blind to the results of these two tests, assessed the participants for vascular dementia or probable Alzheimer's disease, based on the DSM-IV-TR criteria. RESULTS: The sample included 67.2% Qataris. The mean age was 74.86 years (standard deviation =7.71), and 61.9% did not attend school. The mean of the adjusted scores of MMSE-2 based on age and education level was 19.60 (standard deviation =6.58). According to DSM-IV-TR, 17.2% of the participants had dementia. Sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE-2 and the Mini-Cog together were 71.4% and 61.6%, respectively, which were better than those of each test alone. CONCLUSION: Together, the Arabic versions of MMSE-2 and Mini-Cog are good screening tools for cognitive impairment in Arabs.

4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 65(5): 473-9, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028379

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of Low Back Pain in primary care setting population and to examine its association with symptoms of depression and somatisation. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted at 13 Primary Healthcare Centres (throughout Qatar from March to December, 2012. A General Health Questionnaire was used to identify the probable cases. A specially designed questionnaire with three parts was used for data collection: socio-demographic information of the studied subjects, modified version of the Roland-Morris scale for evaluating back-related functional disability, and Symptom Cheklist-90-Revised for depression and somatisation subscales. RESULTS: A representative sample of 2,600 patients was approached and 1,829(70.0%) of them participated in the study. The prevalence of low back pain in the study sample was 56.5%. There were statistically significant differences between subjects with and without low back pain in terms of body mass index (p< 0.025), gender (p< 0.003) and housing condition (p< 0.001). There was a significant difference between subjects with and without the pain in terms of all aspects of functional disability. Somatisation disorder in low back pain was 203 (19.6%) and depression disorder was 265 (25.4%). Most of the patients with LBP reported pain in the arms and legs (p< 0.001); shortness of breath (p< 0.028) palpitations (p=0.004); gastrointestinal complaints such as abdominal pain (p< 0.001), diarrhoea (p< 0.001) and vomiting (p< 0.001); feeling tired (p< 0.001); trouble with sleeping (p< 0.001); headache (p< 0.001) and fainting (p=0.043). The mode of treatment taken by the patients for relief were bed rest 695 (67.2%) followed by warm compression 480 (47.6%), physiotherapy 491 (47.5%), regular exercise 414 (40%), and back plasters 346 (33.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the symptoms of depression and somatisation were prevalent among low back pain patients. Functional disability was higher in the patients. Recognising this problem may lead to better patient-treatment matching and improved clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Somatoformes/epidemiologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Terapia por Exercício , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Fadiga/psicologia , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/psicologia , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/psicologia , Humanos , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Catar/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/psicologia , Transtornos Somatoformes/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Síncope/epidemiologia , Síncope/psicologia
5.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 4(1): 89-95, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25810996

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders including anxiety, depression, somatization, obsessive compulsive, and bipolar disorders are recognized as causing the biggest burden of disease worldwide. AIM: In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and burden of common mental disorders at Primary Health Care Centers (PHCC) using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WHO-CIDI) in the Qatari population, aged 18-65 who attended Primary Health Care (PHC) settings. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study conducted during November 2011 to October 2012. SETTING: Primary Health Care Centers of the Supreme Council of Health, Qatar. SUBJECTS: A total of 2,000 Qatari subjects aged 18-65 years were approached; 1475 (73.3%) agreed to participate. METHODS: Prevalence and severity of International Classification of Disease-10 disorders were assessed with the WHO-CIDI (Version 3.0). RESULTS: Of the 1475 participants, 830 (56.3%) were females and 645 (43.7%) was males. One-third were aged 35-49 years 558 (37.8%). The three most common disorders were major depression disorders (18.31%), any anxiety disorders (17.3%), any mood disorders (16.95%), followed by separation anxiety disorders (15.25%), personality disorder (14.1%). In the present study, prevalence in women was significantly higher than men for the most common psychiatric disorders, specifically generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, specific phobias, obsessive compulsive disorders, posttraumatic disorder, somatization, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, dysthymia, and oppositional defiant disorder. Of the total 20% had only one psychiatric diagnosis and 12% had two disorders, 9.7% respondents with three diagnoses, and finally 4.3% of respondents had four or more diagnoses. CONCLUSION: One-fifth of all adults who attended the PHCC (20%) had at least one psychiatric diagnosis. The CIDI is a useful instrument for psychiatric diagnosis in community settings such as PHC clinics, clinical research and intervention studies. There is an urgent need to not only assess prevalence, but also risk factors, burden, treatment gaps and outcomes to obtain evidence for policy making.

6.
Asian Spine J ; 8(3): 227-36, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24967035

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in the primary care setting with emphasis on the socio-demographic contributing factors and impact of LBP on lifestyle habits. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: LBP is one of the most common medical conditions seen in the Primary Health Care Clinic. METHODS: A representative sample of 2,600 patients were approached and 1,829 subjects agreed to participate in this study (70.0%). Data on socio-demographic characteristics, life style habits and type of treatment were collected through a questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of LBP in the study sample was 56.5% (95% confidence interval, 54.2-58.8). LBP was more prevalent among women (53.9%) compared to men (46.1%). There was significant difference between male and female patients of LBP in terms of ethnicity (p<0.001), marital status (p=0.010), occupation (p<0.001), monthly household income (p=0.004), and cigarette/sheesha smokers (p<0.001). The percentages of different aspects of functional disabilities were statistically significantly higher among females compared to male patients with LBP. Almost a quarter of female patients with LBP (26%) and 18% male patients with LBP reported pain in the arms and legs (p=0.002). In addition, gastrointestinal complaints such as abdominal pain and food intolerance were significantly higher among female patients with LBP as compared to males (31% vs. 24.6%, p=0.018; and 25% vs. 18%, p=0.008, respectively). Complaints about headache and fainting were also significantly higher among female patients as compared to male LBP patients (43% vs. 36%, p=0.029; and 26% vs. 20%, p=0.016, respectively). The multivariate logistic regression revealed that being female, prolonged standing, prolonged sitting, heavy weight lifting, weakness in the legs, regular exercise, and cigarette/sheesh a smoking had a significant effect on the presence of LBP. CONCLUSIONS: LBP is highly prevalent among both genders and in older age. Also, weakness in the legs, smoking, prolonged standing and sitting had a significant effect on LBP. Furthermore, the current study findings support the fact that LBP continues to be an important clinical, social and economic, burden and a public health problem affecting the population of the entire world.

7.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 8(1): 24-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia are at greater risk for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and other cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its criteria among patients with schizophrenia (Sz) according to the revised criteria of NCEP ATP III and assess which component contributed to the increased risk of the MetS in schizophrenia patients. DESIGN: This was a matched case-control study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of the Psychiatry department and Primary Health Care (PHC) Centers of the Supreme Council of Health, State of Qatar. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out among patients with schizophrenia (SZ) and healthy subjects above 20 years old. The study based on matched by age and gender of 233 cases and 466 controls. The survey was conducted from June 2010 to May 2011. Face to face interviews were conducted using a structured questionnaire followed by laboratory tests. Metabolic syndrome was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program - Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III). RESULTS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome among schizophrenic patients (36.5%) were significantly higher than healthy subjects (18.7%) (p<0.001). The prevalence of MetS in schizophrenic subjects was reported to be two times higher than in the general population. The MetS components were higher among schizophrenic patients than healthy subjects. Among the components of MetS, central obesity (63.9%) was the most common criteria among patients compared to healthy subjects (45.7%) (p<0.001). Schizophrenic patients (27%) were significantly obese than the healthy subjects (13.1%). Female schizophrenia patients were more likely to have three or more metabolic abnormalities compared to men. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that metabolic syndrome was highly prevalent in patients with schizophrenia. The female gender was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome. The identification and clinical management of this high risk group is of great importance.


Assuntos
Consanguinidade , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/etiologia , Esquizofrenia/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Catar/epidemiologia , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Asia Pac Psychiatry ; 5(1): E29-38, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23857793

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of somatization, anxiety, depression and stress in a primary care population, explore their association to psychosocial stressors and determine the diagnostic overlap of these four mental disorders. METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. A representative sample of 2,150 patients was approached, of whom 1,762 patients agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire (81.9%). Anxiety was assessed with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Depression was assessed with the depression module Patients Health Questionnaire-8. Somatization was measured with the somatic symptom module PHQ-15. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) instrument was used to identify the stress cases. RESULTS: Of the study sample, 23.8% of the total cases were identified as probable cases. The prevalence of somatization, depression, anxiety and stress was 11.7%, 11.3%, 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. The specific gender prevalence of these four psychological disorders was very similar in men and women: depression (11.3% versus 11.3%), anxiety (7.7% versus 8.9%), somatization (12.5% versus 10.7%) and stress disorders (19.3% versus 17.8%). A significant difference was observed in nationality and marital status for depression and anxiety (P < 0.05). The age-specific prevalence rate showed a higher prevalence in the age group 45-54 years: depression (13.3%), anxiety (9.5%), somatization (12.8%) and stress (20.4%). Unable to control worries (69.2%) was the worst symptom for anxiety disorders, while the majority of the depressed patients wanted to hurt themselves (71.9%). Stomach pain (46.1%) was the most common symptom in somatic patients. Most of the patients experiencing stress could not cope with their daily duties (65.9%). There was a high comorbidity rate of depression, anxiety, somatization and stress observed in the studied population (9.3%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of somatization and depression was similar, but the prevalence of stress was higher in inpatient patients. Somatization, depression, anxiety and stress disorders co-occurred at higher rate in the study sample.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Árabes/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Somatoformes/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Árabes/psicologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Catar/epidemiologia , Estudos de Amostragem , Distribuição por Sexo , Transtornos Somatoformes/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia
9.
Glob J Health Sci ; 5(4): 165-75, 2013 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23777732

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the driving behaviours of four ethnic groups and to investigate the relationship between violations, errors and lapses of DBQ and accident involvement in Qatar. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ) was used to measure the aberrant driving behaviours leading to accidents. Of 2400 drivers approached, 1824 drivers agreed to participate (76%) and completed the driver behaviour questionnaire and background information. RESULTS: The study revealed that the majority of the Qatari (35.9%) and Jordanian drivers (37.5%) were below 30 years of age, whereas Filipino (42.3%) and Indian subcontinent (34.1%) drivers were in the age group of 30-39 years. Qatari drivers (52%) were involved in most accidents, followed by Jordanians (48.3%). The most common type of collision was a head on collision, which was similar in all four ethnic groups. The Qatari drivers scored higher on almost all items of violations, errors and lapses compared to other ethnic groups, while Filipino drivers were lower on all the items. The most common violation was the same in all four ethnic groups "Disregard the speed limits on a motorway". The most common error item observed was "Queing to turn right/left on to a main road". "Forget where you left your car" and "Hit something when reversing" were the two lapses identified in factor analysis. CONCLUSION: The present study identified that Qatari drivers scored higher on most of the items of violations, errors and lapses of DBQ compared to other countries, whereas Filipino drivers scored lower in DBQ items.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Condução de Veículo/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Catar/epidemiologia , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cintos de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos
10.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 4(3): 220-7, 2013 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common conditions for which patients seek medical care. AIM: The aim of the study was to study the epidemiology of low back pain in primary care setting with emphasis on frequency, sociodemographic factors, and impact of low back pain on lifestyle habits. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A representative sample of 2742 patients was approached and 2180 subjects agreed to participate in this study (79.5%). The survey was conducted among primary health care visitors during the period from March to October 2012. The questionnaire collected the sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, and type of treatment taken for relief from recruited subjects. RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, 52.9% were males and 47.1% were females. The prevalence of low back pain in the study sample was 59.2%. Low back pain was more prevalent among women (67.7%) than among men (51.6%). The proportion of low back pain was highest in the age-group 45 to 55 years in both the genders (37.6% and 36.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the men (45.7%) and women (45.2%) with low back pain were overweight with a significant difference (P < .001). More than half of the women with low back pain were housewives (50.4%), whereas most of the men had clerical jobs (36.8%). There was a significant difference observed between men and women in terms of nationality (P < .001), body mass index (P < .001), and occupation (P < .001). Prolonged standing (41.2% vs 29.5%; P < .001) and use of sponge mattress (50.9% vs 45.8%; P .041) was significantly higher among male patients with low back pain compared with females. Coughing/sneezing/straining (9.7% vs 5.9%; P = .01) were more frequent triggering factors in male patients with low back pain as compared with females. CONCLUSION: The study findings revealed that the prevalence of low back pain was higher among women than among men. Low back pain was observed more frequently among older people and among those who were overweight.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Leitos/classificação , Comorbidade , Comparação Transcultural , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Emprego/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Masculino , Estado Civil , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Catar/epidemiologia , Características de Residência , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Issues Ment Health Nurs ; 34(4): 273-80, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23566190

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to examine the extent of psychiatric patients' compliance and non-compliance with treatment and examine the factors that affect compliance. Patients were recruited who were between 16 and 60 years of age and who were hospitalized with a psychiatric disorder and treated in the outpatient clinics of the psychiatry department. A total of 689 patients were approached and 564 patients agreed to participate in the study, a response rate of 81.8%. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that asked about socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, nationality, level of education, occupation, marital status, and life style habits); medication(s) prescribed and the participant's response; the degree of social supervision (rated subjectively by the patient as "poor," "good," or "very good"); data also were obtained from clinical records. Data analyses explored significant associations between compliance and non-compliance and a group of relevant variables. Of the 564 patients studied, 328 (58.2%) were compliant with treatment and 236 (41.8%) were non-compliant. There was no significant difference between compliance and non-compliance in terms of gender (p = 0.471). Patients between 21-30 years of age were significantly more compliant with drug treatment than not. Non-compliance was more common among patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (28.4%), followed by depression (14.4%), and bipolar affective disorder (12.7%) (p = 0.001). Only 25% of compliant patients and 26.3% of non-compliant patients used non-psychotropic medication. Social supervision (40%) was very poor in non-compliant patients whereas 49.4% of compliant patients had very good family support. Notable reasons for non-compliance were irregular attendance to clinic (55.5%), ignorance about side effects of medication (61%), free medicine (45.8%), and a lack of education about medication (58.1%). This study revealed that non-compliance rates among psychiatry patients were comparable to the rates reported in other studies. The findings suggest that there is a need to provide community-level mental health education and proper counseling to psychiatry patients.


Assuntos
Árabes/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente/etnologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Catar , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 25(1): 100-6, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23383671

RESUMO

Although somatic complains are the predominant reasons for seeking general medical care, there has been limited research on the clinical presentation of somatic symptoms in primary care settings in developing countries. The frequency of somatic symptoms in primary care in Qatar and its relationship to comorbidities of mental disorders is presented here. A total of 2,320 Arab patients were approached, of whom 76% agreed to participate for the survey conducted among primary healthcare (PHC) centre patients. The study was conducted with the help of general practitioners (GPs), using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 for depression, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 for anxiety, PHQ-15 for somatic symptoms and the Psychological Stress Measure (PSM)-9 for stress. Of the subjects with somatic symptoms (229 cases), most were Qataris (57.2%). Poor hearing (52.1%), palpitation (47.1%) and stomach pain (43.8%) were the most common in men, whereas constipation (54.6%), feeling depressed (50.9%), and poor hearing (50.6%) were the most common in women; 48.5% had more than four somatic symptoms. Somatic symptoms were severe in 31.9%. Somatic symptoms were associated with depression (15.3%), anxiety (8.7%) and stress disorders (19.2%). The study findings revealed that somatic symptoms were significantly associated with socio-economic status. Somatic symptoms were significantly associated with depression, anxiety and stress disorders.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dor/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Somatoformes , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Sintomas , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Comportamento de Doença , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas Psicológicas , Catar/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Transtornos Somatoformes/classificação , Transtornos Somatoformes/complicações , Transtornos Somatoformes/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Avaliação de Sintomas/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
J Pain Res ; 6: 95-101, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23403693

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP), investigate the sociodemographic characteristics of patients with LBP, and examine its association with psychological distress such as anxiety, depression, and somatization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of the 2742 patients approached, 2180 agreed to participate in this cross-sectional study (79.5% response rate). The survey was conducted among primary health care visitors from March to October 2012 and collected sociodemographic details and LBP characteristics. General Health Questionnaire-12 was used to identify the probable cases. Anxiety was assessed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, depression was assessed with Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and somatization was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-15. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 52.9% males and 47.1% females. The prevalence of LBP was 59.2%, comprising 46.1% men and 53.9% women. LBP was significantly higher in Qataris (57.9%), women (53.9%), housewives (40.1%), and individuals with higher monthly income (53.9%). Somatization (14.9%) was observed more in LBP patients, followed by depression (13.7%) and anxiety disorders (9.5%). The most frequently reported symptoms were "headaches" (41.1%) and "pain in your arms, legs, or joints" (38.5%) in LBP patients with somatization. The most frequent symptoms among depressed LBP patients were "thinking of suicide or wanting to hurt yourself" (51.4%) and "feeling down, depressed, or hopeless" (49.2%). "Not being able to stop or control worrying" (40.2%), "worrying too much about different things" (40.2%), and "feeling afraid as if something awful might happen" (40.2%) were the most common anxiety symptoms in LBP patients. Psychological distress such as anxiety (9.5% versus 6.2%), depression (13.7% versus 8.5%), and somatization (14.9% versus 8.3%) were significantly higher in LBP patients. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of LBP in this study sample was comparable with other studies. Furthermore, psychological distress such as anxiety, depression, and somatization were more prevalent in LBP patients compared to patients without LBP.

15.
World J Diabetes ; 3(6): 123-9, 2012 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22737283

RESUMO

AIM: To examine the possible association between gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety and depression in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: The study was a matched case-control study based on a face to face interview with designed diagnostic screening questionnaires for gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and T2DM, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression and General Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7) for anxiety. The questionnaire consisted of questions about symptoms and signs of anxiety and depression disorders. Also, socio-demographic characteristics, life style habits and the family history of patients were collected. It was carried out from June 2010 to May 2011 among Qatari and other Arab nationals over 20 years of age at Primary Health Care Centers of the Supreme Council of Health, Qatar, including patients with diabetes mellitus and healthy subjects over 20 years of age. RESULTS: In the studied sample, most of the studied T2DM patients with GI symptoms (39.3%) and healthy subjects (33.3%) were in the age group 45-54 years (P < 0.001). The prevalence of severe depression (9.5% vs 4.4%, P < 0.001) and anxiety (26.3% vs 13.7%, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in T2DM patients with GI symptoms than in general population. Obesity (35.7% vs 31.2%) and being overweight (47.9% vs 42.8%) were significantly higher in T2DM patients with GI symptoms than in healthy subjects (P = 0.001). Mental health severity score was higher in T2DM patients with GI symptoms than in healthy subjects; depression (8.2 ± 3.7 vs 6.0 ± 3.6) and anxiety (7.6 ± 3.3 vs 6.0 ± 3.7). The most significant GI symptom which was considerably different from controls was early satiety [odds ratio (OR) = 10.8, P = 0.009] in depressed T2DM patients and loose/watery stools (OR = 2.79, P = 0.029) for severe anxiety. Anxiety was observed more than depression in T2DM patients with GI symptoms. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly associated with depression and anxiety in T2DM patients, especially anxiety disorders.

16.
Ment Health Fam Med ; 9(4): 241-8, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24294299

RESUMO

Background Consanguinity has been suggested as a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia in offspring in some Middle Eastern countries. Aim The purpose of this study was to review the frequency, pattern of parental consanguinity, and family history of schizophrenia among schizophrenia patients in Qatar, and to determine their impact on the associated risk factors. Design This is a cross-sectional study which was conducted between January 2009 and December 2010, in the setting of primary health care (PHC) centres of the Supreme Council of Health, State of Qatar. Subjects A total of 1491 patients aged 18-55 years were approached, of whom 1184 individuals agreed to participate in the study, giving a response rate of 79.4%. Methods The study was based on face-to-face interviews using a specially designed questionnaire that covered sociodemographic characteristics and genetic and other biological factors (e.g. obstetric complications), and a diagnostic screening questionnaire which consisted of six questions about the symptoms of schizophrenia. The diagnostic screening questionnaire was reviewed and used to calculate the final score, which determined a provisional diagnosis. The psychiatrists discussed the psychiatric diagnosis and confirmed it using DSM-IV criteria. The degree of consanguinity between the patient's parents was recorded. Consanguinity was evaluated based on the coefficient of inbreeding (F), which is the probability of homozygosity. Results More than half of the schizophrenia patients were female (57.1%) and over 45 years of age (62.5%). A family history of schizophrenia was significantly more common in parents of schizophrenia patients than in the Arab population without schizophrenia (24.6% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.038). Parental consanguinity was elevated among the patients with schizophrenia (41.3%) with a higher mean coefficient of inbreeding (0.04356 ± 0.028) than in non-schizophrenic subjects (28.7%) with a lower mean coefficient of inbreeding (0.0298 ± 0.035). Schizophrenia diagnoses were more frequent among the offspring of consanguineous parents than among the offspring of non-consanguineous parents. Conclusion The substantial risk observed in the present study reveals that consanguinity is an important risk factor for schizophrenia in Qatar. In addition, the study confirms that the higher familial risks provide strong genetic epidemiological evidence for the overall heritable effects in the aetiology of schizophrenia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...