Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 106(2): 201-206, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The number of hip replacements is constantly and progressively increasing, resulting in an increase in periprosthetic fractures. The main aim of this study is to analyze costs and outcomes of surgical treatment for those fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on periprosthetic proximal femur fracture presented a single-level I trauma center. Medical records were reviewed in terms of demographic data, diagnosis (according to Vancouver classification), type of surgical treatment, hospitalization length and follow-up. Patients were interviewed about number of consultations after discharge, medications and physiotherapy sessions. Clinical outcome was evaluated with WOMAC score at the last follow-up, and patient health status was evaluated with the EQ5D5L score pre-trauma and at the last follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical treatment: reduction and internal fixation alone and revision plus fixation. A further group was also considered: patients underwent a Girdlestone procedure. Global costs for each group were calculated. RESULTS: We initially recruited 117 patients, 17 of them were lost at follow-up. Furthermore, 19 patients (19%) died during the follow-up, and 81 of them were therefore included in the study. Mean follow-up was 26.5 months. Mean postoperative WOMAC score was 39.44, and EQ5D5L score was 9.12 for the preoperative period and 12.35 at the last follow-up. A significant worsening of clinical conditions was found comparing the period before fracture to the last follow-up (p < 0.01). Quality of life after surgery resulted to be poor or fair in 40% of the patients at a mean follow-up of 26.5 months. No significant differences between groups were found according to patients' health status. Mean global costs for mayor surgeries were 18,822 Euros; mean costs for fixation alone were 17,298 Euros while for fixation and revision were 20,966 Euros, but no statistically difference was found between these two groups. Mean cost for Girdlestone group was 12,664 Euros. CONCLUSIONS: In proximal femur periprosthetic fractures, either fixation or revision plus fixation presents high costs but patients' postoperative quality of life is poor.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/economia , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Estresse Financeiro , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/economia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/normas , Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/economia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/etiologia , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 4: S25-S28, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526948

RESUMO

Severe traumatic losses of soft tissues and bone at foot and ankle level are often treated by means of amputation, but this may involve important psychological and anatomic consequences for the patient. If there are good vascular conditions, reconstruction by means of composite free flaps is often the only alternative to this demolitive treatment. The transfer of composite free flaps that include vascularized bone from various donor sites may provide anatomical reconstruction and recovery of function of the foot and ankle. If plantar skin and its sensation are present, these techniques may represent a good choice in the treatment of complex injuries of the foot, and by means of skeletal morphological reconstruction, they may give good functional results. With these premises, we report a case in which was used a groin flap to fill and solve a complex defect of bone and soft tissues of midfoot in a gunshot injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Pé/cirurgia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Virilha/irrigação sanguínea , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Idoso , Traumatismos do Pé/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Pé/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirculação , Radiografia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/fisiopatologia
3.
Injury ; 47(11): 2591-2595, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27622615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture is still controversial: open techniques have a higher rate of soft tissue complications but a lower incidence of re-rupture than percutaneous tenorrhaphies. The aim of our retrospective study was to analyze and compare clinical and functional results in patients treated with either the conventional open or minimally invasive suture treatment with the Achillon® system. METHODS: A retrospective review of 140 patients was performed; 72 were treated with open tenorrhaphy, 68 with the minimally invasive Achillon® suture system. RESULTS: With a comparable re-rupture rate, there was a statistically significant reduction in surgical time, incidence of minor complications, time required to return to sport activities and return to work in the minimally invasive group. CONCLUSIONS: Achillon® mini-invasive suture system is a reliable tool for the Achilles tendon ruptures, able to reduce the incidence of soft tissues complications if compared to the classic open tenorrhaphy, while maintaining strength of the suture and leading to superimposed functional outcomes.


Assuntos
Tendão do Calcâneo/lesões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Ruptura/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruptura/fisiopatologia , Ruptura/reabilitação , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Traumatismos dos Tendões/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/reabilitação , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 36(3): 170-2, 1997.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9232495

RESUMO

Fascial entrapment of the superficial peroneal nerve produced severe pain in the ankle and foot of a 16-year-old female athlete after several sprains of the same ankle. The pain coexisted with erythema and sensory alteration of the area involved. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis of this unusual neuropathy. Limited fasciectomy, at the point where the nerve becomes subcutaneous, relieved all symptoms.


Assuntos
Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/diagnóstico , Nervo Fibular , Adolescente , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/complicações , Fasciotomia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/etiologia , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/cirurgia , Entorses e Distensões/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA