Resilience and Its Association With Activities of Daily Living 3 Months After Stroke.

Independence in basic activities of daily living (ADL) is an important outcome after stroke. Identifying factors associated with independence can contribute to improve post-stroke rehabilitation. Resilience, which is the ability of coping with a serious event, might be such a factor. Still, the impact of resilience and its role in rehabilitation after stroke is poorly investigated. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess whether resilience assessed early after stroke can be associated with independence in basic ADL 3 months later. Hospitalized patients with a diagnosed acute stroke and a modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 4 were included. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression were applied to assess whether resilience as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale within the first 2 weeks after stroke was associated with basic ADL measured by Barthel Index at 3-month follow-up. Age, sex, fatigue, stroke severity at admission and pre-stroke disability were added as covariates. Sixty-four participants (35 (54.7%) male), aged 75.9 (SD 8.6) years were included 4.3 (SD 2.8) days after stroke. There was no significant change in resilience from baseline 3.1 (SD 0.3) to 3 months later 3.2 (SD 0.5). Resilience was not associated with basic ADL in neither the bivariate (b = 2.01, 95% CI -5.21, 9.23, p = 0.580) nor in the multivariate regression models (b = 0.50, 95% CI -4.87, 6.88, p = 0.853). Our results showed that resilience remained stable during follow-up. Early measurement of resilience was not associated with independence in basic activities of daily living 3 months after stroke. These results, indicate that resilience is a personal trait not associated with the outcome of physical adversity. However, future research should investigate whether resilience is related to the outcomes of psychosocial adversity after a stroke.

Associations between changes in gait parameters, balance, and walking capacity during the first 3 months after stroke: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Independent ambulation is a common rehabilitation goal after stroke, requiring adequate balance and efficiency of gait. Spatiotemporal gait parameters are expected to improve in the first 3 months and their association with balance and efficiency of gait may provide useful insights into the recovery of safe and independent mobility. OBJECTIVE: Examine the associations between changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters, balance, and walking capacity during the first 3 months after stroke. METHODS: This prospective observational study included participants diagnosed with stroke. Within the first 2 weeks after stroke onset and again 3 months (±2 weeks) later, gait was assessed using a GAITRite mat at self-selected gait speed, balance using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and walking capacity using the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). Changes in gait parameters, balance, and walking capacity were assessed using paired sample t-tests, and linear regression analyses were used to assess associations between changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters, BBS, and 6MWT. RESULTS: Seventy-nine participants (mean (SD) age 75.4 (8.5) years; 44 men) were included. Gait parameters, balance, and walking capacity all improved during follow-up. The bivariate regression analyses showed associations between improvements in all gait parameters, except walk ratio, with improvement in balance, and in all gait parameters with improvement in walking capacity. Only gait speed was associated with balance (13.8 points, 95% CI 0.5, 27.8, p = .0042) and walking capacity (256 m, 95% CI 173,340, p < .001) in the multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Improved spatiotemporal gait parameters were associated with improved balance and walking capacity within the first 3 months after stroke.

Associations Between Adherence to the Physical Activity and Exercise Program Applied in the LAST Study and Functional Recovery After Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between participants' adherence to a physical activity and exercise program after stroke and functional recovery 18 months after inclusion. DESIGN: Secondary analyses of the intervention arm in the multisite randomized controlled trial Life After Stroke (LAST). SETTING: Primary health care services in 3 Norwegian municipalities. PARTICIPANTS: Of the participants enrolled (N=380), 186 (48.9%) were randomized to the intervention. The study sample comprised community dwelling individuals included 3 months after stroke, with mean age of 71.7 ± 11.9 years and 82 (44.1%) women. According to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 97.3% were diagnosed as having mild (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale<8) and 2.7% with moderate (8-16 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) stroke. INTERVENTION: Monthly coaching by physiotherapists encouraging participants to adhere to 30 minutes of daily physical activity and 45-60 minutes of weekly exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Secondary outcome measures were 6-minute walk test, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the physical domains of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Adherence was assessed by combining participants' training diaries and physiotherapists' reports. RESULTS: The relationship between adherence and functional recovery was analyzed with simple and multiple linear regression models. Adjusted for age, sex, dependency, and cognition, results showed statistically significant associations between adherence and functional outcomes after 18 months, as measured by MAS, TUG, BBS, and SIS (P≤.026). CONCLUSIONS: Increased adherence to physical activity and exercise was associated with improved functional recovery after mild to moderate stroke. This emphasizes the importance of developing adherence-enhancing interventions. Dose-response studies are recommended for future research.

High-intensity aerobic interval training for patients 3-9 months after stroke: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-intensity aerobic interval training (AIT) has shown to be beneficial in patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Presumably, patients with stroke also benefit from such treatment. However, the feasibility and potential efficacy of high-intensity AIT should be investigated for patients early after stroke. METHODS: This was a single-group, pre-test-post-test, intervention study. The intervention consisted of a 6-week high-intensity AIT programme, performed twice a week. The AIT comprised 4 × 4-minute intervals, at 85-95% of peak heart rate, interrupted by 3-minute active breaks. Adherence to the protocol, compliance and adverse events were registered to assess feasibility. Cardiorespiratory fitness and functional outcomes were assessed before and after the intervention and at 6 and 12 weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Ten men and five women (mean age 70.0 ± 7.7; range 61-85 years) with mild to moderate stroke were included, 3-9 months after onset. One patient was diagnosed with cancer during follow-up. There were three minor events, but no serious adverse events occurred. All patients accomplished all training sessions and reached the 85% intensity level, except one patient who discontinued the last session. The mean peak oxygen uptake showed no significant improvement from pre-treatment, 28.7 ± 3.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1), to post-treatment, 29.6 ± 3.6 ml kg(-1) min(-1), p = 0.189, whereas the mean 6-minute walk test improved from 410.7 ± 101.4 m to 461.0 ± 99.6 m, p = 0.001, and the median (interquartile range) Rivermead Motor Assessment Scale improved from 12.0 (11.0-13.0) to 13.0 (11.0-13.0) points, p = 0.100. These improvements continued after the intervention was concluded. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that high-intensity AIT is feasible for a selected group of stroke patients. However, the training should be accomplished in line with the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for high-risk populations to ensure safety. The participants achieved a clinically highly significant improvement in walking distance. This intervention should be tested out in a randomized controlled trial to assess if it is superior to other interventions.