Association Between Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors and Diagnosis of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Introduction Lung cancer is a prevalent and potentially lethal cancer. The stage at initial presentation for diagnosis predicts mortality and helps to guide treatment options. Thus, it is critical to determine what factors impact the stage of cancer at diagnosis. This study sought to determine if certain socioeconomic and demographic factors are associated with receiving an early (Stage 0-I) or advanced (Stage IV) diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), 1,149,539 patients were identified as having an NCDB Analytic Stage Group diagnosis of Stage 0-I (early) versus Stage IV (advanced) NSCLC between 2004 and 2018. Patients with early and delayed diagnoses were compared based on specific characteristics including sex, race, ethnicity, number of comorbid conditions, insurance status, median annual income, level of education, geographic location, and reporting facility. Using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), the data underwent analysis using binary multivariate logistic regression, chi-square analyses, and one-way ANOVA. Results Factors associated with an advanced diagnosis of NSCLC include being male, Black, Native American, or Hispanic. Compared to patients with at least one comorbid condition, those without comorbid conditions are more likely to present with advanced disease. Patients with private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, or other government insurance are all less likely to present with advanced-stage cancer than patients without insurance. Compared to patients in the lowest median household income quartile, those in the second and fourth quartiles are diagnosed earlier. Patients living in areas where a higher proportion of residents lack a high school diploma are more likely to present with advanced NSCLC. Additionally, living in the Midwest and Western United States and presenting to Community Cancer programs are associated with advanced disease at initial presentation. Conclusions Factors that were associated with the advanced presentation of NSCLC included being male, Black, Native American, or Hispanic, having a lack of comorbid conditions or insurance, earning a lower median annual income, and living in a zip code where a higher proportion of residents lack a high school diploma. Additionally, residing in the Midwest and Western United States and seeking care at Community Cancer programs were associated with advanced disease at initial presentation. Understanding that certain socioeconomic and demographic factors impact the stage at initial diagnosis of NSCLC can allow for targeted intervention strategies aimed at the most at-risk individuals, areas, and facilities.

Utilization of Palliative Care in Osteosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Review.

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common form of bone cancer, but the utilization of palliative care (PC) in patients with this cancer has not previously been investigated in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma (2004-2017) were identified within the NCDB. Cross tabulations with Chi-square analysis were performed to evaluate frequencies of palliative care use by patient, facility, and tumor characteristics. Multivariate logistic binary regression was performed to evaluate relationships between patient, treatment facility, and tumor characteristics and the use of palliative care. Results: A total of 7498 patients were analyzed with 2.8% of patients diagnosed having any form of palliative care utilization. Of this group, 53.37% received PC within the first 12 months after diagnosis. Of the 2.8% of patients receiving PC the most common forms of PC utilized were non-curative symptom-directed surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities (56.7%). Palliative care usage was increased in patients with greater tumor diameter, tumors in the bones of the midline, or stage IV tumors. Palliative care usage was decreased in patients living within 25-49 miles of their treatment facility, those living in pacific states, those with chondroblastic osteosarcoma, or those with private insurance. Conclusion: Palliative care use in patients with osteosarcoma increases with tumor stage, tumor size, or more proximal tumors, but overall utilization remains markedly low. Future studies should further define these patterns of care and help expand the utilization of PC.

Primary Site and Other Prognostic Factors for Fibrosarcoma: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: Fibrosarcoma (FS) is a rare and malignant tumor that can occur in a variety of anatomic sites. The goal of this study is to use the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze various factors affecting overall survival in FS and to be one of the rare studies to characterize the significance of the primary anatomic sites. METHODS: The study cohort included 2,278 patients diagnosed with fibrosarcoma who received surgery from the NCDB. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze the significance of factors affecting overall survival. RESULTS: The head, face, and neck (HR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.01-2.05; P = 0.046) and thorax anatomical sites (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.02-1.73; P = 0.035) had a higher increased risk of death in comparison to the lower limb and hip. Compared to patients with private insurance, patients without insurance (HR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.25; P = 0.006) and patients with Medicaid (HR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.90; P < 0.001) had decreased overall survival. Patients associated with a zip code-level median household income ≥ $63,000 had a decreased risk of mortality when compared to lower income groups. CONCLUSION: In general, older patients with comorbidities, advanced-stage disease, and larger tumors who did not have private insurance and were from areas associated with lower income levels had poorer overall survival. No significant difference in overall survival was associated with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant radiation.