RESUMO
As a consequence of a continuous demand for increased throughput of pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, industries have introduced strategies to reduce the number of samples such as cassette analysis (pooling of samples after the in-life phase). Here, we have investigated whether relevant PK parameters change as a consequence of cassette analysis, and whether there are circumstances that disqualify this technique from being used. 22 compounds were intravenously and orally administered to parallel groups of 3 rats. Each compound was administered discretely. Equal volumes of three plasma samples corresponding to each time point of three discretely dosed rats with different compounds were pooled (cassette analysis). Samples were prepared by protein precipitation followed by UPLC-MS/MS analysis using pos/neg switching when required. With cassette analysis, 4 compounds, morphine, phenytoin, rofecoxib and diclofenac, showed high limit of quantification (LOQ) values after pooling, which led to less reliable PK analyses. Of all samples with contents above LOQ, about 5% could not be detected in pool samples compared to single samples. However, an excellent correlation was seen for all PK parameters when comparing the parameters obtained from discrete analysis versus those obtained from cassette analysis, although half life showed somewhat more scatter than the others. When PK parameters were grouped as low-medium-high, clearance, volume of distribution, half life and bioavailability were similar between discrete and cassette analysis for 90%, 86%, 95% and 90% of the total number of compounds tested, respectively. Some additional improvement was achieved if compounds with a low MS response were excluded. In summary, cassette analysis is an effective strategy to reduce samples without affecting the estimated PK parameters that are important for decision-making.
