The comparative effects of drive and test stimulus intensity on myocardial excitability and vulnerability.

The number and intensity of stimuli that set basic cycle length in cardiac electrophysiological studies can influence the electrical properties assessed by extrastimuli. The relative contribution of drive (S1) and test (S2) stimulus intensity in defining myocardial excitability and vulnerability has not been reported. The purpose of this investigation was to assess this interaction and to determine whether atrial and ventricular findings differed. The effects of S1 and S2 intensity on atrial and ventricular stimulus-intensity-refractory-period curves were determined in open-chest dogs: comparisons were made between curves with S1 intensity varied between diastolic threshold (DT) and 10 mA and S2 intensity maintained at DT and those with S1 intensity maintained at DT and S2 intensity varied between DT and 10 mA. S1-S1 was held constant and S1-S2 varied. The effects of different stimulation sites, cycle length, number of stimulations, and neural blockade were assessed. S1 intensity amplification shifted atrial stimulus-intensity-refractory period curves in the direction of increased excitability and vulnerability; the changes were more pronounced than those obtained by modulating S2 intensity. The changes produced by increasing S1 intensity were evident at different cycle lengths and were enhanced by an increased number of stimulations, but were not evident when S1 and S2 were delivered at different atrial sites. Although beta-blockade attenuated the effects of increasing S1 intensity somewhat, the addition of cholinergic blockade virtually abolished it. Ventricular refractoriness was also changed by modulation of S1 intensity, but the changes were less striking. In the atrium, modulation of S1 intensity has greater effects of stimulus-intensity-refractory-period relations than modulation of S2 intensity; in the ventricule, the converse is true.

Verapamil prolongs atrial fibrillation by evoking an intense sympathetic neurohumoral effect.

BACKGROUND: Verapamil is an effective drug to slow ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF). Clinically, however, i.v. verapamil enhances AF despite experimental evidence suggesting favorable effects of the drug on AF-induced electrical remodeling of the atria. METHODS AND RESULTS: To clarify this controversy, i.v. verapamil's effects were determined in 41 anesthetized dogs, including 6 after beta-blockade. Intravenous verapamil (0.20 mg/kg, bolus, and 0.20 mg/kg/h, infusion) increased the duration of AF (induced by a single extrastimulus), from 19 +/- 6 to 130 +/- 24 s, P < 0.001, and slowed its ventricular response, from 246 +/- 25 to 110 +/- 15 min-1, P < 0.001. Mean aortic pressure, P = 0.002, and systemic vascular resistance, P < 0.035, decreased, and mean right atrial pressure increased, P < 0.001. Plasma norepinephrine concentration increased by 502 +/- 83 pg/mL, P < 0.001, plasma epinephrine concentration by 804 +/- 206 pg/mL, P = 0.002, and plasma total catecholamine concentration by 1606 +/- 366 pg/mL, P = 0.001. Prolongation of AF was related to an increase in mean right atrial pressure, R = 0.49, P = 0.014, right atrial wall tension, R = 0.45, P = 0.044, and plasma norepinephrine concentration, R = 0.83, P < 0.001, with plasma norepinephrine concentration remaining as an independent predictor of AF lengthening on multivariable analysis. In the presence of beta-blockade, verapamil produced comparable or more exaggerated hemodynamic effects, but it did not promote AF. CONCLUSION: The prolongation of AF by verapamil can be related directly to the intense sympathetic neurohumoral effect that occurs following the drug's administration.