Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Bioresour Technol ; 386: 129463, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37429557

RESUMO

The effects of heterogenous (anaerobic sludge from treating distillery sewage, ASDS) and homologous (anaerobic sludge from treating swine wastewater, ASSW) inocula on anaerobic digestion and the microbial community in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treating swine wastewater were compared. The highest chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies with ASDS (84.8%) and ASSW (83.1%) were obtained with an organic loading rate of 15 kg COD/m3/d. For ASSW compared with ASDS, methane production efficiency was 15.3% higher and excess sludge production was 73.0% lower. The abundance of the cellulose hydrolyzing bacterium Clostridium sensu stricto_1 with ASDS (36.1%) was 1.5 times that with ASSW, while that of Methanosarcina with ASSW (22.9%) was > 100 times that with ASDS. ASDS reduced the content of pathogenic bacteria by 88.0%, while ASSW maintained a low level of pathogenic bacteria. ASSW greatly improved the methane production efficiency of wastewater and is more suitable for treating swine wastewater.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Águas Residuárias , Animais , Suínos , Esgotos/microbiologia , Anaerobiose , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos , Reatores Biológicos , Bactérias , Metano
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...