[Development of Deep Venous Thrombosis Shortly after Neurological Surgery].

Little is known about the incidence and characteristics of deep venous thrombosis(DVT)developing shortly after neurological surgery. Lower extremity venous ultrasound scanning was performed before and after surgery, and retrospective data of 157 surgical cases, including endovascular surgery(42.0%), craniotomy(28.7%), burr hole(24.2%), and shunt(3.2%), were evaluated. DVT that had not been pre-operatively observed was discovered in five cases of surgery(five patients, 3.2%)on the day following the surgery, and it was asymptomatic in all cases. One patient was diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism as a complication. No difference in characteristic factors was observed between the presence and absence of DVT development. In addition, DVT was detected on preoperative examinations in 10 cases of surgery(10 patients, 6.4%). On the basis of these results, ambulation on the first postoperative day is considered mostly safe. On the other hand, taking into account the increase in the number of patients with DVT and the possibility that a thrombus present in calf veins propagates toward the proximal side, pre-and post-operative screening tests should be performed more often.

Cerebral aneurysm neck diameter is an independent predictor of progressive occlusion after stent-assisted coiling.

BACKGROUND: Some intracranial aneurysms treated by stent-assisted coiling (SAC) with incomplete occlusion undergo progressive occlusion (PO) during follow-up period. We analyzed the predictors for the occurrence of PO. METHODS: Among 74 cerebral aneurysms treated by SAC using the Enterprise or Neuroform stents from 2010 to 2015, we included 43 aneurysms with occlusion grade of neck remnant (NR, n = 36) or residual aneurysm (RA, n = 7) at the post-procedure. We defined PO as improvement in occlusion grade from RA to NR, or from NR or RA to complete occlusion on angiographic follow-up imaging at 6 months after the procedure. We analyzed the independent predictors for PO using a multivariate logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three aneurysms were analyzed, with mean volume embolization ratio of 30.3 ± 6.7%. Twenty aneurysms (47%) achieved PO. Univariate analysis found that the median neck diameter of the aneurysms was smaller in aneurysms with PO than others. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also found that the odds ratio of neck diameter of the aneurysm for PO was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.19-0.82, p < 0.01). Moreover, ROC curve analysis for PO found that the optimal cut-off value of the neck diameter was 5.5 mm, with a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 57% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Incompletely occluded aneurysms with a neck diameter of 5.5 mm or less might be more likely to develop PO within 6 months after SAC by using Enterprise or Neuroform stents.

Double balloon protection during carotid artery stenting for vulnerable carotid stenosis reduces the incidence of new brain lesions.

BACKGROUND: The use of distal filter protection alone is associated with a high risk of ischemic complications when vulnerable carotid stenosis is treated by carotid artery stenting (CAS). Double balloon protection, a combination of distal balloon protection and proximal balloon occlusion, can be utilized. We assessed the outcome and complications of the double balloon protection method for vulnerable carotid stenosis. METHODS: Among 130 patients who underwent CAS from 2009 to 2014, we enrolled the following patients: those whose target lesion was vulnerable as evaluated by MRI, i.e., a signal ratio of plaque to posterior cervical muscle on T1-weighted images before CAS of ≥1.5, and those who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) studies within 48 h after the procedure. Ninety patients were enrolled. We investigated DWI findings of the double balloon protection group compared with those of the simple distal balloon protection and distal filter protection groups. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (71 %) underwent double balloon protection, 15 patients (17 %) simple distal balloon protection, and 11 patients (12 %) distal filter protection. Symptomatic embolic complications and new lesions on DWI after CAS were significantly less common in patients undergoing double balloon protection compared to distal balloon protection or distal filter protection (0 % vs. 20 %, 9 %, P < 0.01, and 30 % vs. 67 %, 82 %, P < 0.01, respectively). Logistic regression analysis also identified the odds ratio of double balloon protection for new lesions on DWI after CAS of 0.23 (95 % confidence interval: 0.07-0.70, P < 0.01) compared to simple distal protections. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients who underwent CAS for vulnerable carotid stenosis, double balloon protection was an independent significant factor associated with a reduction in the risk of new lesions on DWI after the procedure compared to conventional distal protections.