RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Simulation training is an important component of medical education. In former studies, diagnostic simulation training for direct and indirect funduscopy was already proven to be an effective training method. In this prospective controlled trial, we investigated the effect of simulator-based fundus biomicroscopy training. METHODS: After completing a 1-week ophthalmology clerkship, medical students at Saarland University Medical Center (n = 30) were block-randomized into two groups: The traditional group received supervised training examining the fundus of classmates using a slit lamp; the simulator group was trained using the Slit Lamp Simulator. All participants had to pass an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE); two masked ophthalmological faculty trainers graded the students' skills when examining patient's fundus using a slit lamp. A subjective assessment form and post-assessment surveys were obtained. Data were described using median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: Twenty-five students (n = 14 in the simulator group, n = 11 in the traditional group) (n = 11) were eligible for statistical analysis. Interrater reliability was verified as significant for the overall score as well as for all subtasks (≤ 0.002) except subtask 1 (p = 0.12). The overall performance of medical students in the fundus biomicroscopy OSCE was statistically ranked significantly higher in the simulator group (27.0 [5.25]/28.0 [3.0] vs. 20.0 [7.5]/16.0 [10.0]) by both observers with an interrater reliability of IRR < 0.001 and a significance level of p = 0.003 for observer 1 and p < 0.001 for observer 2. For all subtasks, the scores given to students trained using the simulator were consistently higher than those given to students trained traditionally. The students' post-assessment forms confirmed these results. Students could learn the practical backgrounds of fundus biomicroscopy (p = 0.04), the identification (p < 0.001), and localization (p < 0.001) of pathologies significantly better with the simulator. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional supervised methods are well complemented by simulation training. Our data indicate that the simulator helps with first patient contacts and enhances students' capacity to examine the fundus biomicroscopically.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Simulation training has an important role in medical education. In ophthalmology, simulation-based training has been shown to be significantly effective for surgical and diagnostic training in direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy. In this study, we analysed the effects of simulator-based slit lamp training. METHODS: In this prospective controlled trial, medical students in their eighth semester at Saarland University Medical Center (n = 24) who had attended a 1-week ophthalmological internship were randomized into two groups: The traditional group (n = 12) was examined directly after the 1-week internship; the simulator group (n = 12) was trained with the slit lamp simulator before passing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). A masked ophthalmological faculty trainer assessed the students' slit lamp skills (maximum total score 42 points [pts]): preparation (5 pts), clinical examination (9.5 pts), assessment of findings (9.5 pts), diagnosis (3 pts), commentary on the examination approach (8 pts), measurement of structures (2 pts) and recognition of five diagnoses (5 pts). All students completed post-assessment surveys. Examination grades and survey responses were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The overall performance of the slit lamp OSCE was significantly better (p < 0.001) in the simulator group than in the traditional group (29.75 [7.88] vs. 17.00 [4.75]) with significantly higher scores for the preparation and assessment of slit lamp controls (5.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [3.5]; p = 0.008) and localization of relevant structures (6.75 [3.13] vs. 4.0 [1.5]; p = 0.008). Consistently higher scores, but not significant, were assigned for the description of structures found (4.5 [3.38] vs. 3.25 [2.13]; p = 0.09) and the correct diagnosis (3.0 [0.0] vs. 3.0 [0.0]; p = 0.48). Surveys reflected the students' subjectively perceived knowledge gain during the simulator training for slit lamp illumination techniques (p = 0.002), recognition (p < 0.001), and assessment of the correct localization of pathologies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Slit lamp examination is an important diagnostic method in ophthalmology. Simulator-based training improved students' examination techniques for localizing anatomical structures and pathological lesions. The transfer of theoretical knowledge into practice can be achieved in a stress-free atmosphere.
