New patient pathway using vacuum-assisted biopsy reduces diagnostic surgery for B3 lesions.

AIM: To assess the clinical impact of a new patient management pathway incorporating vacuum-assisted biopsy for lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all B3 lesions on core biopsy in the pathology database from April 2008 to April 2010. Outcome measures assessed included final histological diagnosis, frequency of diagnostic surgical biopsy, and impact on management. RESULTS: In the old pathway, there were 95 B3 lesions, of which 14% (13/95) were planned for vacuum-assisted biopsy and 86% (82/95) for surgical biopsy. In the new pathway, there were 94 B3 lesions, of which 68% (64/94) were planned for vacuum-assisted biopsy and 32% (30/94) for surgical biopsy. Following further sampling with vacuum-assisted biopsy, only 13% of patients required diagnostic surgical biopsy and in 25% of cases, a preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma was reached allowing patients to proceed to therapeutic surgery. CONCLUSION: The new pathway has reduced the number of benign diagnostic surgical biopsies performed and increased the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.

Reporting and management of breast lesions detected using MRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most accurate technique for diagnosing and delineating the extent of both invasive and in-situ breast cancer and is increasingly being used as part of the preoperative work-up to assess the local extent of disease. It is proving invaluable in providing information that allows successful single-stage surgery. An inevitable consequence of the high sensitivity of MRI is that it will identify additional lesions that may or may not represent significant extra disease. This may complicate and delay the preoperative process. This paper outlines a strategy for managing MRI-detected lesions to optimize the benefits of breast MRI as a local staging tool while minimizing the false-positive diagnoses. It discusses the importance of good technique to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions. Methods to refine the patient pathway to minimize delays are discussed. The format of MRI reporting is discussed in detail as is the usefulness of discussion of cases at multidisciplinary meetings. Illustrative cases are used to clarify the points made.

Practical advice on clinical decision making during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a useful approach in the treatment of many breast cancers. One of the main advantages of NACT is the possibility of breast conservation surgery in patients who would otherwise require a mastectomy. Most literature on NACT focuses on the effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimen and subsequent mastectomy rates. There is little guidance in the literature on aspects of individual patient management and decision making during NACT. This paper considers practical management advice where NACT is considered and adopted.

Can the NHS Breast Screening Programme afford not to double read screening mammograms?

AIM: Rapid expansion of the National Health Service (UK) Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) to routinely invite women aged 50-70 years will result in many new readers undertaking screen reading. A timely method for assessing performance and preferably one that facilitates a steep learning curve will be required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This unit screens a population of 88000 women aged 50-64 years and double reads >90% films. A record is kept of proven screen-detected cancers not recalled for assessment by either the first or second reader but correctly recalled following third-reader arbitration. Individual readers' workload and recall rates are obtained by running an annual co-writer report. The results of this 7 year prospective audit are presented. RESULTS: In total 177167 women were screened between 1/4/95 and 31/3/02 resulting in the detection of 1072 cancers. Eighty-seven cancers (8.1%) were detected after arbitration. Individual readers recall to assessment rates and percentage of cases incorrectly returned to routine recall varied. Prompt feedback of missed/misinterpreted cases allowed both experienced and inexperienced readers to modify their recall thresholds for particular mammographic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: It is recommended this audit method is adopted by all units in the NHSBSP and that the Advisory Committee for Breast Cancer Screening review the policy of single versus double reading.