Endoscopic and clinical variables that predict sustained remission in children with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to identify early clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic factors associated with sustained remission in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with infliximab. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of data collected from 51 children (6-17 years old) with moderate-to-severe UC treated with infliximab for 1 year in the T72 clinical trial. The primary outcome was steroid-free remission at weeks 30 and 54 of treatment, which was based on patient and physician assessments. We compared the ability of the Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI, a noninvasive clinical index), levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and mucosal healing to predict which patients would be in steroid-free sustained remission after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: Week 8 PUCAI scores best predicted which patients would be in steroid-free remission after 1 year of treatment; 9 of 17 patients who had PUCAI scores <10 points were in sustained remission (53%), compared with 4 of 20 who had PUCAI scores ≥10 (20%) (P = .036). Mucosal healing at week 8 was associated with steroid-free remission at 1 year, but this did not reach significance; 7 of 16 patients with mucosal healing were in remission after 1 year (44%), compared with 6 of 21 without mucosal healing (29%) (P = .34). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for association with steroid-free sustained remission were 0.70 for the PUCAI (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.88), 0.56 for mucosal healing (95% CI, 0.36-0.76), and 0.44 for level of CRP (95% CI, 0.24-0.65). By using a multivariable logistic regression model, the week 8 PUCAI was the only factor associated with steroid-free remission at 1 year (P = .038). PUCAI-defined remission had a high degree of concordance with complete mucosal healing at week 8 (33% of patients were in remission according to the PUCAI vs 31% with mucosal healing). CONCLUSION: On the basis of a post hoc analysis of data from the T72 clinical trial on the effect of infliximab in pediatric patients with UC, the PUCAI was no less predictive of sustained remission than mucosal healing at week 8, and both were superior to CRP level. Routine endoscopic evaluation in children with UC who are in complete clinical remission (ie, PUCAI <10 points) may not be necessary.

Induction and maintenance therapy with infliximab for children with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of infliximab for inducing and maintaining benefit in children with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Patients (6-17 years old) who had active UC (Mayo scores of 6-12; endoscopic subscores ≥ 2) and had not responded to or tolerated conventional treatment were given 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6. The primary end point was response at week 8 (decreases in Mayo scores ≥ 30% and ≥ 3 points and decreases in rectal bleeding subscores of ≥ 1 or an absolute subscore of ≤ 1). At week 8, only responders were randomly assigned to groups given infliximab every 8 or 12 weeks (q8w or q12w) and followed through week 54. Maintenance end points included pediatric UC activity index scores <10 points, defined as remission. RESULTS: At week 8, infliximab induced a response in 73.3% of patients (44 of 60) (95% confidence interval, 62.1%-84.5%; a positive result was defined by 95% confidence interval lower limit >40%). Among responders, twice as many were in remission at week 54 after q8w (8 of 21, 38.1%) than q12w (4 of 22, 18.2%; P = .146) therapy. Assuming the q8w remission rate for responders, the overall remission rate at week 54 would be 28.6%. Serious adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in similar proportions in the q8w and q12w groups. No deaths, malignancies, opportunistic infections, tuberculosis, or delayed hypersensitivity reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab was safe and effective, inducing a response at week 8 in 73.3% of pediatric patients with moderate to severely active UC who did not respond to conventional therapy. The overall remission rate at week 54 for all enrolled patients was 28.6%, assuming the more effective q8w remission rate.

Role of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in recurrent thrombotic events after acute coronary syndromes.

We postulated that patients with recent acute coronary syndromes and antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex would have an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), even in the absence of thrombocytopenia. We analyzed sera from patients enrolled in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had a high likelihood of prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients without thrombocytopenia with the 30-day primary endpoint (death, MI, or revascularization) and 109 age-, gender-, and race-matched controls who did not achieve the primary endpoint. Twenty-three of 218 patients (10.6%) had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients with anti-PF4/heparin were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.011) or MI (21.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.008) than patients who were negative for the antibody. Antibody-positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/L vs. 780 +/- 228 microg/L; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1 (246 +/- 50 microg/L vs. 222 +/- 71 microg/L; p = 0.02) than antibody-negative patients. In a multiple logistic regression model that included inflammatory markers and clinical risk factors, antibodies to PF4/heparin were a strong predictor of 30-day MI (odds ratio, 9.0; 95% confidence intervals, 2.1 to 38.6; p < 0.01), with IL-6 being the only other predictor (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence intervals, 1.0 to 1.2; p = 0.03). Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex are a novel, independent predictor of MI at 30 days in patients presenting with acute coronary ischemic syndromes. Antibodies to PF4/heparin are a stronger predictor of MI than clinical characteristics or inflammation markers.

Final results of the ReoPro readministration registry.

Because of its potential for antigenicity, theoretical concerns related to readministration of abciximab have been raised. We conducted the ReoPro Readministration Registry to assess the efficacy and safety of abciximab readministration. A total of 1,342 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and who received abciximab for at least a second time were recruited. Safety end points were hypersensitivity reactions, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia (TCP). Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) titers were determined before and after readministration. Procedural success was 98% and was not influenced by the number of courses of abciximab or the presence of HACA. There were no cases of anaphylaxis. There were 5 minor allergic reactions, none of which required termination of the infusion. Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 31 patients (2.3%), including 1 (0.07%) with intracranial hemorrhage. TCP (<100 x 10(9)/L) developed in 5% of patients; profound TCP (<20 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 2%. In patients who received abciximab within 1 month of a previous treatment (n = 115), the risk of developing TCP and profound TCP was 16.5% and 12.2%, respectively. Having a positive HACA before readministration was not correlated with adverse clinical outcomes or bleeding, but was associated with TCP (14.1% vs 4.4%, p = 0.002) and profound TCP (5.6% vs 1.6%, p = 0.036). Readministration of abciximab can be accomplished without severe allergic responses and with a bleeding and efficacy profile similar to first-time administration. However, the rate of severe and profound TCP is increased relative to first-time administration, particularly when the time between treatments is <30 days or when HACA is present.

Antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin are associated with elevated endothelial cell activation markers in patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: We postulated that antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complex lead to a heightened inflammatory state, contributing to an increased risk of recurrent thrombotic events. METHODS: We analyzed serum from a subset of patients in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients with the 30 day primary endpoint (death, MI or revascularization) and an equal number of controls, excluding patients with thrombocytopenia. Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and inflammatory markers (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin, us-CRP, IL-6) were measured on serum samples. RESULTS: Patients with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.01), or MI (21.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.01) than patients who were antibody negative. In a multiple logistic regression model that included inflammatory markers and clinical risk factors, antibody to PF4/heparin was a strong predictor of 30 day MI (odds ratio: 9.0; 95% confidence intervals 2.1-38.6; p < 0.01), with IL-6 being the only other predictor (odds ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence intervals 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03). Antibody positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/l versus 780 +/- 228 microg/l; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1(246 +/- 50 microg/l versus 222 +/- 71microg/l; p = 0.02) than antibody-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex were associated with elevated levels of endothelial but not platelet activation markers, or markers of a systemic inflammatory state. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were associated with a 9-fold increased risk of recurrent MI at 30 days. We measured soluble cell adhesion molecules, CRP and IL-6 from 218 non-thrombocytopenic patients, 23 of whom had antibodies to PF4/heparin. Antibody positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/l versus 780 +/- 228 microg/l; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1(246 +/- 50 microg/l versus 222 +/- 71 microg/l; p = 0.02). In a multiple logistic regression model, antibody to PF4/heparin was a predictor of 30 day MI (odds ratio: 9.0; 95% CI: 2.1-38.6; p < 0.01). The presence of antibodies to PF4/heparin, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, is a stronger predictor of 30 day MI than clinical variables or inflammatory markers.

Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies: an independent predictor of 30-day myocardial infarction after acute coronary ischemic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: We postulated that antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complex might contribute to recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed serum from patients enrolled in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had high likelihood of prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients without thrombocytopenia with the 30-day primary end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or revascularization) and 109 age-, gender-, and race-matched controls who did not achieve the primary end point. An ELISA for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies was performed using 48-hour serum samples. The analyses were done by blinded investigators, and the results were correlated with clinical outcomes. Twenty-three of 218 patients (10.6%) had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% versus 11.3%, P=0.011) or MI (21.7% versus 6.2%, P=0.008) than patients who were negative for the antibody. After multiple logistic regression analysis, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies remained a predictor of 30-day death or MI (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 11.3; P=0.0093) and MI (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 15.0; P=0.0108). The antibody was not associated with the composite end point (death, MI, or revascularization) or with death or revascularization alone. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex are a novel, independent predictor of myocardial infarction at 30 days in patients presenting with acute coronary ischemic syndromes. This finding may explain the previous association between thrombocytopenia and adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and may have important implications for the choice of anticoagulant regimens.