The Fight Tumour Blindness Registry: Efficient capture of high-quality real-world data in uveal melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of a web-based data collection tool to track the management and outcomes of uveal melanoma patients. DESIGN: Description of a clinical registry. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with uveal melanoma. METHODS: A panel of expert ocular oncologists, with input from other relevant specialties and individuals with expertise in registry development, collaborated to formulate a minimum data set to be collected to track patient centred, real-world outcomes in uveal melanoma. This data set was used to create the Fight Tumour Blindness! (FTB!) registry within Save Sight Registries. RESULTS: The data set to be collected includes patient demographics and medical history, baseline visit, follow-up visit including tumour treatment, metastatic staging and surveillance, pathology, and patient-reported questionnaires. The inbuilt mechanisms to ensure efficient and complete data collection are described. CONCLUSIONS: The FTB! registry can be used to monitor outcomes for patients with uveal melanoma. It allows benchmarking of outcomes and comparisons between different clinics and countries.

Deferral of Treatment for Small Choroidal Melanoma and the Risk of Metastasis: An Investigation Using the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online (LUMPO).

BACKGROUND: We estimated metastatic-death risk when the treatment of small choroidal melanomas is deferred until growth is observed. METHODS: In 24 patients with choroidal melanoma (median diameter 5.85 mm), the exponential growth rate estimated by a mixed-effects model was 4.3% per year. Using the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online v.3 (LUMPO3), we measured changes in 15-year metastatic and non-metastatic death risks according to whether the tumor is treated immediately or after observing growth 4 or 12 months later, considering age, sex, and metastasis predictors. RESULTS: In 40-year-old females with 10 mm, disomy 3 and monosomy 3 choroidal melanomas (prevalence 16%), the 15-year absolute risks of metastatic death are 4.2% and 76.6%, respectively, increasing after a 4-month delay by 0.0% and 0.2% and by 3.0% and 2.3% with tumor growth rates of 5.0% and 20.0%, respectively. With 12-month delays, these risks increase by 0.0% and 0.5% and by 1.0% and 7.1%, respectively. Increases in metastatic-death risk are less with smaller tumors and with a higher risk of non-metastatic death. CONCLUSIONS: Deferring treatment of choroidal melanomas until documentation of growth may delay iatrogenic visual loss by months or years and is associated with minimal increase in metastatic mortality, at least with small tumors with usual growth rates of up to 40% per year.

Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). METHODS: Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28-0.94) when all eyes were included. CONCLUSIONS: Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Improved Staging of Ciliary Body and Choroidal Melanomas Based on Estimation of Tumor Volume and Competing Risk Analyses.

PURPOSE: The current, 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic classification and staging model for uveal melanoma does not fully separate survival estimates for patients with advanced stages of the disease (e.g., IIIB and IIIC). Furthermore, some tumors in higher size categories have a smaller volume than tumors in lower categories. Therefore, we developed a novel model for prognostication of metastatic mortality based on estimations of tumor volume. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter case series of patients with uveal melanoma involving the choroid, ciliary body, or both. PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand five hundred twenty-eight consecutively registered patients treated at 3 tertiary ocular oncology centers on 2 continents between 1981 and 2022. METHODS: Data on survival, tumor size, and extent were collected for all 6528 patients. Tumor volume was estimated using a simple equation based on largest basal diameter and thickness. Volume-based size categories and stages were developed and validated in independent patient cohorts using competing risk analyses, and correlations with cytogenetic and cytomorphologic features were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cumulative incidence of metastatic death. RESULTS: The 6528 patients were distributed over 7 stages based on estimated tumor volume and anatomic extent (V stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC), with a 15-year incidence of metastatic death ranging from 7% to 77%. A new category, V1min, and corresponding stage IA, were introduced, indicating an excellent prognosis. Metastatic mortality in V stage IIIC was significantly higher than that in V stage IIIB (P = 0.03), whereas incidence curves crossed for patients in AJCC stages IIIC vs. IIIB (P = 0.53). Univariable and multivariable competing risk regressions demonstrated higher Wald statistics for V stages compared with AJCC stages (1152 vs. 1038 and 71 vs. 17, respectively). The frequency of monosomy 3, gain of chromosome 8q, and epithelioid cytomorphologic features increased with tumor volume (R2 = 0.70, R2 = 0.50, and R2 = 0.71, respectively; P < 0.001) and showed similar correlations with both AJCC and V stages. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic classification and staging of ciliary body and choroidal melanomas based on estimation of tumor volume improves prognostication of metastatic mortality. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Subconjunctival Ocular Argyrosis following Treatment with Ruthenium 106 Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma.

Introduction: Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy is one of the commonest eye-sparing treatments for choroidal melanoma. These patients require long-term surveillance of the treated tumour remnant to ensure there is no local recurrence. New or progressive pigmented lesions in treated eyes are often regarded as suspicious - especially if there are concerns of extra-scleral extension. Case Presentations: We present two cases of posterior choroidal melanoma treated five and 10 years previously with Ru-106. Both cases developed subconjunctival dark/black lesions on the anterior surface of the eye in the quadrant of the conjunctival peritomy during Ru-106 treatment. Both had similar findings on histopathology: black, non-organic, particulate foreign material of varying confluence deposited on elastin and collagen fibres. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis confirmed the material contained silver. Discussion: The Ru-106 applicator consists of a radioactive core of Ru-106 encapsulated within pure silver as a radiation shield. During surgical insertion, stainless steel suture needles and forceps can occasionally scratch the applicator's silver eyelets and scatter microscopic particles of elemental silver into the operative field. These particles were likely deposited within the subconjunctival tissues of these patients during brachytherapy administration, leading to localised ocular argyrosis. Iatrogenic ocular argyrosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of new pigmented lesions in patients treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy. This study is the first to unequivocally identify the cause of some post-brachytherapy ocular surface pigmentation as caused by silver.

Adenoma of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium presenting as glaucoma.

Purpose: We describe a case of adenoma of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium in a 58-year-old male, who presented with glaucoma. Observations: A healthy White male was incidentally found to have an elevated intraocular pressure in his left eye (25 mmHg) during a visit to a local optometrist. After further investigations he was diagnosed with a primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and treated with drops for two years until he developed a sectorial cataract. During the first dilated eye exam, a pale tan tumor was discovered, that seemed to originate from the superior ciliary body, causing a sectorial-cortical cataract and subluxation of the lens. The eye was enucleated on the suspicion of a rare adult medulloepithelioma, because of multicystic features on B-scan ultrasonography. However, histopathological examination revealed an adenoma of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium that grew in trabecular papillary patterns, with smaller areas of solid and microcystoid growth. As this is a benign tumor without metastatic potential, the patient was referred back to his home clinic without requirement for radiological staging or screening. Conclusion and Importance: Adenomas of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium (NPCE adenomas) are benign tumors that are often mistaken for malignant counterparts. Thus, this case report expands on the available literature of this rare entity.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Different Prognostic Systems in Guiding Surveillance for Metastases in Uveal Melanoma.

Uveal melanoma (UM) metastasises in ~50% of patients, most frequently to the liver. Surveillance imaging can provide early detection of hepatic metastases; however, guidance regarding UM patient risk stratification for surveillance is unclear. This study compared sensitivity and specificity of four current prognostic systems, when used for risk stratification for surveillance, on patients treated at the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre (LOOC) between 2007-2016 (n = 1047). It found that the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online III (LUMPOIII) or Liverpool Parsimonious Model (LPM) offered greater specificity at equal levels of sensitivity than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system or monosomy 3 alone, and suggests guidance to achieve 95% sensitivity and 51% specificity (i.e., how to detect the same number of patients with metastases, while reducing the number of negative scans). For example, 180 scans could be safely avoided over 5 years in 200 patients using the most specific approach. LUMPOIII also offered high sensitivity and improved specificity over the AJCC in the absence of genetic information, making the result relevant to centres that do not perform genetic testing, or where such testing is inappropriate or fails. This study provides valuable information for clinical guidelines for risk stratification for surveillance in UM.

Fear of cancer recurrence and adverse cancer treatment outcomes: predicting 2- to 5-year fear of recurrence from post-treatment symptoms and functional problems in uveal melanoma survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in later survivorship can lead to poorer mental health, quality of life and physical and functional recovery. Later-occurring FCR may be a consequence of late-emerging physical symptoms and functional problems from cancer or its treatment. Based on the self-regulation model, we predicted that persistent or escalating symptoms and functional problems would prospectively predict FCR observed 2-5 years after diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: This is a five-year study of 708 uveal melanoma (UM) patients, measuring self-reported visual and ocular symptoms, functional problems and FCR at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-diagnosis. A mixed measures design over four levels with observations staggered to represent prospective prediction. Criterion variables were FCR at 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Predictors were symptom and function scores measured at the previous two observations to FCR. Controls were FCR measured at the previous observation to the criterion FCR measure and demographic, clinical and treatment variables. RESULTS: Linear mixed modelling showed that FCR was uniquely predicted by enduring symptoms, those that emerged two observations previously, but not symptoms arising at the previous observation. FCR was predicted by functional problems, which emerged in the observation prior to FCR, but not the observation previous to that. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent or emerging post-treatment symptoms and functional limitations are probable risk factors for late-occurring FCR in UM survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Monitoring symptoms and functional limitations assists in identifying at-risk survivors and targeting preventive interventions. Self-regulation theory suggests that helping survivors to more realistically appraise symptoms and functional problems may prevent FCR.

Long-term visual outcomes after ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the long-term visual outcomes in patients with posteriorly located choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy between January 2013 and December 2015. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for post-equatorial choroidal melanoma with available Snellen visual acuity before and after treatment, and the development and treatment of radiation complications. RESULTS: There were 219 patients with posterior choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy. Median follow up was 56.5 months, range 12-81 months. Final visual acuity was ≥6/12 in 97 (44.3%) patients, 6/12 to 6/60 in 57 (26.0%), <6/60 in 55 (25.1%) and 10 (4.6%) eyes were enucleated. Radiation maculopathy was the most common radiation complication encountered, occurring in 53 (24.2%) patients. Of these, final visual acuity was 6/12 in 10 patients (18.9%), 6/12 to 6/60 in 26 (49.1%), <6/60 in 16 (30.2%) and 1 eye (1.9%) was enucleated. Twenty-five (47%) with radiation maculopathy were treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy, 27 (51%) were monitored and one (2%) was treated with scatter photocoagulation. Eyes treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy had better final vision than those observed or treated with retinal laser (chi-square, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, close proximity to the optic nerve and fovea, and large or notched plaque type was associated with final vision worse than 6/12. CONCLUSION: Most patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma retain 6/60 vision, with almost half retaining 6/12 vision at long term follow up.

The MOLES system to guide the management of melanocytic choroidal tumours: can optometrists apply it?

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although melanocytic choroidal tumours of the choroid are a common eye pathology, no standardised protocol exists for their management in the community. BACKGROUND: Choroidal naevi are found in approximately 6% of the adult White population, whereas choroidal melanomas are rare, with an annual incidence of 5-10/million/year. Multimodal imaging has advanced the understanding of malignancy imaging biomarkers, but distinguishing between a small melanoma and naevus remains difficult and an algorithm for their management by community practitioners has not been uniformly adopted. One of the authors (BD) devised the MOLES scoring system, which indicates malignancy likelihood according to mushroom shape, orange pigment, large size, enlargement, and subretinal fluid. When applied by ocular oncologists, the system accurately distinguishes choroidal naevi from melanomas. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether community optometrists can appropriately manage patients with melanocytic choroidal tumours using this system. METHODS: Clinical images of 25 melanocytic choroidal tumours were presented in an online survey, including colour fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography, and B-scan ultrasound images. Using the MOLES system, 39 optometrists diagnosed tumours as naevus or probable melanoma and decided between community monitoring and ophthalmologist referral. Responses were compared to MOLES grading of the same clinical images by ocular oncologists. RESULTS: Using MOLES, optometrists correctly identified 389/406 probable melanomas (95.8% sensitivity) and 331/516 choroidal naevi (64.1% specificity); correctly referred 773/778 tumours to an ophthalmologist (99.4% sensitivity); and correctly managed 80/144 lesions (55.6% specificity) in the community. CONCLUSION: Optometrists safely applied the MOLES scoring system in this survey. Further measures are indicated to reduce choroidal naevi over-referral and evaluate MOLES system usage in clinical optometric practice, where some imaging modalities may not be readily available.

Can the MOLES acronym and scoring system improve the management of patients with melanocytic choroidal tumours?

It can be difficult for practitioners to determine the likelihood of malignancy in melanocytic choroidal tumours. This author has therefore devised the MOLES acronym to highlight the most informative clinical features, which comprise mushroom shape, orange pigment, large size, enlargement, and subretinal fluid. Each of these is scored 0 if absent, 1 if subtle or uncertain, and 2 if present. Tumours are categorised as 'common naevus', 'low-risk naevus', 'high-risk naevus' and 'probable melanoma' according to whether the sum of these five scores is 0, 1, 2 or 3 or more, respectively. Tentative recommendations, subject to future studies, include: review of 'common naevi' by a community optometrist whenever the patient attends for another reason, such as a two-yearly 'check-up' (i.e., 'self-care'); non-urgent referral of patients with 'low-risk naevi' or 'high-risk naevi' to an ophthalmologist to plan long-term surveillance (i.e., determining the frequency of assessments and whether these should be undertaken by an ophthalmologist or a community optometrist); and urgent referral of patients with a MOLES score >2 (i.e., 'probable melanoma') to an ophthalmologist for immediate referral to an ocular oncologist if a suspicion of malignancy is confirmed. The MOLES system does not require assessment of internal acoustic reflectivity by ultrasonography. MOLES scores correlate well with diagnosis of choroidal naevi and melanomas by ocular oncologists; however, further evaluation of this aid in routine optometric practice and other situations is needed. MOLES should prevent unnecessary referral of patients with naevi for second opinion and non-essential monitoring of these patients at hospital eye services.

Is Tumour Thickness Measurement Required for MOLES Scoring of Melanocytic Choroidal Tumours?

Introduction: It can be challenging to distinguish between choroidal naevi and melanomas in the community setting, particularly without access to ultrasonography (US), required to measure the thickness of melanocytic choroidal tumours. We aimed to determine whether thickness measurement is required for MOLES scoring of melanocytic choroidal tumours. Methods: The dataset of a recent MOLES evaluation was reviewed. Patients were selected for the present study if their MOLES tumour size category was determined by tumour thickness measured with US. The largest basal tumour diameter and tumour thickness were then measured from ultra-widefield fundus images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, respectively. Results: The tumour size category was determined by tumour diameter in 203/222 (91.4%) with no influence of tumour thickness. The tumour thickness influenced the MOLES score in 19/222 (8.6%) patients. In 11/19 patients with OCT measurements of tumour thickness, the US measurement exceeded the OCT by more than 25% in 5 patients, more than 50% in 2 patients, and more than 75% in 1 patient. As a result, the revised tumour thickness based on OCT determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. The ultra-widefield fundus images measurements increased the diameter score by 1 in 5 patients. As a result, the revised tumour thickness determined the size category in 4/216 (1.8%) patients. If both the revised diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 4 patients. If both the diameter and thickness scores were considered, the MOLES score reduced in 5 and increased in 1. Only 0.94% (2/211) of melanocytic choroidal tumours assessed with MOLES when using Optos ultra-widefield fundus images diameter and OCT to measure tumour diameter and thickness, respectively, required a change in management from a reduction in MOLES score from 1 to 0. Discussion/Conclusion: This study suggests that the MOLES category for size is influenced more by the tumour diameter, if it can be measured accurately, than by the thickness. This study suggests ignoring tumour thickness if this cannot be measured accurately with OCT, unless the tumour has a mushroom shape.

Virtual Reality Oculokinetic Perimetry Test Reproducibility and Relationship to Conventional Perimetry and OCT.

Purpose: Vivid Vision Perimetry (VVP; Vivid Vision, Inc) is a novel method for performing in-office and home-based visual field assessment using a virtual reality platform and oculokinetic perimetry. Here we examine the reproducibility of VVP Swift and compare results with conventional standard automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral-domain (SD) OCT. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Fourteen eyes of 7 patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) (average age, 64.6 years; 29% women) and 10 eyes of 5 patients with suspected glaucoma (average age, 61.8 years; 40% women) were enrolled. Methods: Patients with OAG and suspected glaucoma were enrolled prospectively and underwent 2 VVP Swift examinations. Results were compared with 1 conventional SAP examination (Humphrey Visual Field [HVF]; Zeiss) and 1 SD OCT examination. Main Outcome Measures: Mean sensitivity (in decibels) obtained for each eye in 2 VVP Swift test sessions and a conventional SAP examination, thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) for the SD OCT examination, and mean test durations of the VVP Swift and SAP examinations. Results: The mean test duration of VVP Swift in both eyes (8.5 minutes) was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) than SAP (12.2 minutes). The average absolute difference of the mean sensitivity between the 2 VVP Swift sessions was found to be 0.73 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-1.06). A statistically significant association was found between average mean sensitivity measurements from the VVP and mean deviation (MD) measurements obtained by the HVF with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P < 0.001). Mean visual sensitivity measurements from the VVP Swift test were significantly associated with average RNFL thickness (r = 0.66; P = 0.014) and GCC thickness (r = 0.63; P = 0.02), whereas the correlation coefficients between HVF MD and RNFL and GCC were 0.86 (P < 0.001) and 0.83 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the VVP Swift test can generate reproducible results and is comparable with conventional SAP. This suggests that the device can be used by clinicians to assess visual function in glaucoma.

Trends in Uveal Melanoma Presentation and Survival During Five Decades: A Nationwide Survey of 3898 Swedish Patients.

Background: In contrast to most other cancers, uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by an absence of major improvements in patient survival during the last several decades. In this study, we examine changes in incidence rates, patient age and tumor size at diagnosis, treatment practices and survival for patients diagnosed in Sweden during the period 1960-2010. Methods: All patients diagnosed with posterior UM between January 1st, 1960, and December 31st, 2009, in Sweden, were included (n = 3898). Trends in incidence, primary treatment modality, patient age and tumor size were analyzed. Disease-specific survival was plotted in Kaplan-Meier curves and the cumulative incidence of UM-related mortality was evaluated in competing risk analysis. Results: Crude (6.5-11.6 cases/million/year) and age-standardized incidence rates (5.6-9.6 cases/million/year) varied between individual years during the study period, but both had a stable linear trend overall (p ≥ 0.12). Gradually, plaque brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 replaced enucleation as the most common primary treatment. The mean patient age at diagnosis increased from 59.8 years in 1960 to 66.0 in 2009. Conversely, the mean tumor size became gradually smaller during the period. In linear regression, the basal diameter and tumor apical thickness decreased with a slope coefficient of -0.03 mm (p = 0.012) and -0.05 mm (p = 1.2 × 10-5) per year after 1960, respectively. Patients diagnosed after 1990 had significantly better disease-specific survival than patients diagnosed before 1990 (p = 2.0 × 10-17). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of UM-related mortality was highest for patients diagnosed 1960-1969 and 1970-1979, with slightly lower incidences for patients diagnosed 1980-1989 and even lower for those diagnosed after 1990 (p = 7.1 × 10-13). The incidence of mortality from other causes than UM did not differ between periods (p = 0.16). Conclusion: In the period from 1960-2010, crude and age-standardized incidence rates of UM have remained stable in Sweden. Several other aspects have changed: Plaque brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 has replaced enucleation as the most common primary treatment modality; patients have become older and their tumors smaller at the time of diagnosis; and their survival has improved. This might indicate a beneficial survival effect of earlier diagnosis and treatment, but the potential influence from lead-time bias should be taken into consideration.

Outcome Measures of New Technologies in Uveal Melanoma: Review from the European Vision Institute Special Interest Focus Group Meeting.

Uveal Melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intra-ocular tumor in adults. New diagnostic procedures and basic science discoveries continue to change our patient management paradigms. A recent meeting of the European Vision Institute (EVI) special interest focus group was held on "Outcome Measures of New Technologies in Uveal Melanoma", addressing the latest advances in UM, starting with genetic developments, then moving on to imaging and treatment of the primary tumor, as well as to investigating the most recent developments in treating metastases, and eventually taking care of the patient's wellbeing. This review highlights the meeting's presentations in the context of the published literature.

Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors.

PURPOSE: Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told that life expectancy is either normal (good prognosis) or severely curtailed because of metastatic disease (poor prognosis). Treatment cannot change life expectancy. To identify whether prognosis is associated with psychological harm, we compared harm in UM survivors with good and poor prognoses and those who declined testing and compared these outcomes to general population norms. METHODS: Non-randomized 5-year study of a consecutive series of 708 UM survivors (51.6% male, mean age 69.03, SD=12.12) with observations at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. We operationalized psychological harm as anxiety and depression symptoms, worry about cancer recurrence (WREC) and poor quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Compared to other groups, survivors with poor prognoses showed initially elevated anxiety and depression and consistently elevated worry about local or distant recurrence over 5 years. Good prognoses were not associated with outcomes. Generally, no prognostic groups reported anxiety, depression and WREC or QoL scores that exceeded general population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large sample, we found that harm accruing from a poor prognosis was statistically significant over 5 years, but did not exceed general non-cancer population norms. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors desire prognostic information. At a population level, we do not believe that our findings show sufficiently strong links between prognostication outcome and psychological harm to deny patients the option of knowing their prognosis. Nonetheless, it is important that patients are informed of potential adverse psychological consequences of a poor prognosis.