Sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (60 mg) after repeated oral administration of two different original prolonged release formulations.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in the disposition of isosorbide-5-mononitrate between male and female volunteers. METHOD: Plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(SS)) data of isosorbide-5-mononitrate were obtained in a randomized, crossover, multiple-dose bioequivalence study in 24 subjects (12 females and 12 males). Participants received a single oral dose of 60 mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate prolonged-release tablet formulation (formulations I and II) on each of 6 consecutive days. Plasma isosorbide-5-mononitrate concentrations were determined according to validated methods involving liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 2 x 24 plasma concentration-time curves of the parent drug could be analyzed. The intersubject variation in plasma concentrations ranged from 25-50% (coefficient of variation). With both formulations, the mean plasma concentration-time curves for males and females ran parallel. The parameters Cmax, Cmin, AUC(SS), and AUC(SS)/kg in females were significantly higher than in males (p < 0.0001). This difference was solely attributed to the difference in body weight (p = 0.0024) and body mass index between males and females (p = 0.0113). Seven females showed a t = 0 = 24 h (Cmin) plasma concentration that was twice as high as the other 5 females and all the males; 125 +/- 12.2 ng/ml versus 59.3 +/- 9.2 ng/ml, respectively, in females (p < 0.0001) and 56.3 +/- 6.9 ng/ml in males (p < 0.0001). With both formulations, females in the n = 7 group had a longer t(1/2) and MRT than females in the n = 5 group, 5.06 +/- 0.76 h, 11.2 +/- 0.55 h versus 4.19 +/- 0.56, 9.40 +/- 0.62 h (p = 0.0057). The male group did not show this phenomenon, their disposition was similar to that of the female group of n = 5. CONCLUSION: The difference found in the Cmax and AUC(SS)/kg of isosorbide-5-mononitrate between male and female subjects must be due to the difference in dose/kg, following a standard dose of 60 mg. Fixed dose administration is common practice due to the available pharmaceutical formulations, while in the ideal situation the dose should be based on dose/kg or titrated to the required clinical effect.

Variable absorption of clavulanic acid after an oral dose of 25 mg/kg of Clavubactin and Synulox in healthy dogs.

The aims of this investigation were to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters and to identify parameters, based on individual plasma concentration-time curves of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in dogs, that may govern the observed differences in absorption of both drugs. The evaluation was based on the data from plasma concentration-time curves obtained following a single dose in an open, randomized, two-way crossover study involving 24 male Beagle dogs treated with two Amoxi-Clav formulations (A Clavubactin and B Synulox, each with 200/50 mg). Plasma amoxicillin and clavulanic acid concentrations were determined using validated bioassay methods. The half-life of elimination of amoxicillin was 1.5 h (t1/2 = 1.52 +/- 0.19 h, Cmax = 11.4 +/- 2.74 microg/mL), and that of clavulanic acid 0.76 h (t1/2 = 0.71 +/- 0.23 h, Cmax = 2.06 +/- 1.05 microg/mL). There was a fivefold variation in the AUCt of clavulanic acid for both formulations, while the AUCt of amoxicillin varied by a factor of 2. The mean ratio of the AUCt amoxicillin : clavulanic acid was 12.7 +/- 3.65 for formulation A and 11.8 +/- 5.22 for formulation B (P = 0.51).

Liver and gut mucosa acetylation of mesalazine in healthy volunteers.

AIM: The aim of this investigation was to identify which part of a dose mesalazine is acetylated by enzymes in the gut wall during the absorption process, and which part by the liver enzymes after absorption. METHOD: This study was based on data from four bioequivalence studies of different formulations of tablets (gastro-resistant single dose 500 mg (n = 24) and prolonged-release tablets (single dose 1000 mg, n = 18; multiple dose 1000 mg t.i.d. six days n = 28), suppositories (single 500 mg dose, n = 24) and a study with two i.v. administrations of 100 and 250 mg mesalazine (n = 6). In total, 200 administrations were carried out and plasma concentration-time curves obtained and analyzed. There was a large variability in the absorption of mesalazine for all formulations. The plasma concentration-time curves of parent drug and metabolite acetylmesalazine run nearly parallel, independent of the formulation and the dose. Plasma and urine mesalazine and acetylmesalazine concentrations were determined according to validated methods using HPLC analysis with coulometric or mass-spectrometric detection. RESULTS: As a result of the large variations in release and absorption of mesalazine in the pharmaceutical formulations and administrations, it was possible to demonstrate that acetylation occurs in the gut wall and in the liver. By comparing oral and rectal data to intravenous data, it was possible to indicate where (and to what extent) acetylation occurs in the gut wall, in the liver, or both. Rectal administration of a mesalazine suppository and intravenous administration results in hepatic acetylation. Oral administrations of mesalazine results in both gut wall and hepatic acetylation. Acetylation by the gut wall amounts to 30% of the dose for gastroresistant tablets and to 40% of the dose for prolonged-release tablets.

Mono- and biphasic plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from a 500 mg suppository in healthy male volunteers controlled by the time of defecation before dosing.

This study was based on data from a bioequivalence study (n=24) of two different formulations of suppositories containing 500 mg mesalazine (formulation I and II), with a similar dissolution profile in phosphate buffer pH 6.8. There was a large intra- and intersubject variability in the plasma concentration-time curves of mesalazine from both suppositories. The aim of the investigation was to identify the parameters that caused the observed large variations in release and absorption of mesalazine in the rectum. Plasma mesalazine and acetylmesalazine, and urine acetylmesalazine concentrations were determined according to validated methods involving HPLC analysis with coulometric detection. Lower limit of quantitation values were respectively 10.4 and 19.4 ng mL(-1) in plasma and 0.96 microg mL(-1) in urine. The time of defecation before and after insertion was recorded. There was a clear distinction between subjects who showed monophasic mesalazine release/absorption and those who showed biphasic and more extended release/absorption. With formulation I there was a correlation between time of defecation before dosing and the type of absorption, monophasic and biphasic absorbers showed a significant difference in the time of defecation, e.g. 9.7+/-5.6 h vs 18.8+/-11.9 h (P = 0.0218). The impact of time of defecation before dosing was non-significant with formulation II, 16.7+/-7.2 h vs 15.1+/-4.2 h (P = 0.67). The impact of the time elapsed between administration and time of defecation after the insertion of the suppository was not significant for the type of release/absorption. The plasma concentration-time curves of the metabolite ran parallel to that of the parent drug, the more parent drug was released/absorbed, the more was acetylated (P = 0.0013) and excreted into the urine (P = 0.0004). After absorption the compound was metabolized into acetylmesalazine, and renally excreted (12-13% of the dose). Monophasic release/ absorption resulted in 7.1% metabolite with I and 10.3% with II (P = 0.0004), while biphasic release/absorption gave 16.8% metabolite with I and 15.5% with II. The renal clearance of the metabolite acetylmesalazine was independent of the observed defecation patterns (300 mL min(-1), P > 0.8), stool composition, and type of absorption.