Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 300(5): 1303-1316, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31531777

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The impact of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (AMRB) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) of healthy pregnant women is not described in detail in Germany. In this study, we screened for MSSA and AMRB, especially for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as well as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli. Potential risk factors for colonization with AMRB/MSSA and the potential effects of colonization with these on the obstetric population were investigated. METHODS: From October 2013 until December 2015 pregnant women were screened before birth for colonization with AMRB/MSSA from the mammillae, nose, perianal and vaginal area. Before birth, the expectant mother was administered a standardized interview questionnaire by a trained interviewer. Data from the hospital admission records were also included. RESULTS: Samples from 651 pregnant women were analyzed. Colonization with MSSA was detected in 14.3% (n = 93), AMRB in 3.5% [(n = 23); MRSA: n = 3/ESBL: n = 20]. Significantly more colonization of AMRB/MSSA could be detected in women who had previously given birth compared to women who were nulliparous (p < 0.05). MSSA colonization was significantly associated with self-reported respiratory diseases during pregnancy (p < 0.05), but AMRB/MSSA colonization was not statistically associated with other types of infection. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a low overall rate of colonization with AMRB/MSSA, as well as a low percentage of colonized pregnant women who developed infections. Multiparous women are at higher risk for colonization with MSSA/MRSA or ESBL. Because the prevalence of AMRB/MSSA is low, this study suggests that general screening of pregnant women without risk factors is not recommended.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Gravidez , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(10): 1819-1826, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28474179

RESUMO

Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing E. coli. Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing E. coli. Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing E. coli, the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...