Increased silicon levels in dialysis patients due to high silicon content in the drinking water, inadequate water treatment procedures, and concentrate contamination: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Although silicon is considered as an essential element, little is known about the basic effects and clinical significance of increased concentrations of the element in dialysis patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multicentre study we found silicon levels in haemodialysis (HD) patients to be markedly increased. In these patients silicon concentrations were significantly higher than those noted in subjects with normal renal function as well as in patients with chronic renal failure not yet in dialysis and patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Moreover we noted that in both HD and CAPD patients mean silicon levels differed from one centre to another. Also, was there in the HD population a significant difference in serum silicon levels among patients from different countries. In HD patients differences in serum silicon levels were either due to the use of silicon contaminated dialysis fluids or an increased oral intake of the element mainly originating from the high silicon content of the drinking water. Silicon contamination of the dialysis fluid was found to be due to either the use of reverse osmosis membranes that insufficiently retain the element during water treatment or by the addition of concentrates containing high amounts of silicon. Using a recently developed high-performance liquid chromatographic/atomic absorption spectrophotometric (HPLC/ETAAS) hybrid technique, we found silicon in serum to be present as a low-molecular-weight non-protein-bound component, which in the presence of a low silicon dialysate is adequately removed during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of increased serum silicon levels is not yet known and as such deserves further investigation. In view of the controversy that exists on the element's assumed protective as well as toxic role in the development of some (aluminium-related) neurodegenerative diseases and its vital role in bone formation, monitoring of the silicon levels in serum, tap water, and dialysis fluids might become important.

Staphylococcus aureus infections in haemodialysis patients: pathophysiology and use of nasal mupirocin for prevention.

Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequently (42%) isolated micro-organism during bacteraemic episodes in haemodialysis patients. Nasal carriage of S. aureus is of major importance in determining the risk of subsequent infections. Indeed, nasal carriage of S. aureus is highly prevalent in uraemic patients from the onset of maintenance dialysis therapy. The strains isolated simultaneously from the nares and the hands are usually the same. Likewise, infecting S. aureus strains and those isolated from nasal surveillance cultures obtained in the same patient are usually similar. S. aureus infections in haemodialysis patients are thus mostly to be considered as auto-infections. The nares are therefore an elective site for the prevention of S. aureus infections in haemodialysis patients. This has been demonstrated with oral rifampin, and more recently with nasal mupirocin, which is highly effective. Long-term application of nasal mupirocin (e.g. once per week) is cost-effective and is only rarely associated with the emergence of mupirocin-resistance in S. aureus.

[Epidemiology and prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections during hemodialysis]. / Epidémiologie et prévention des infections à Staphylococcus aureus en hémodialyse.

Staphylococcus aureus is the pathogen most often isolated from blood during bacteraemic episodes in haemodialysis patients (42%). The pathophysiology of these infections is discussed and a prophylactic strategy is proposed. Nasal carriage of S. aureus, found in 42% of haemodialysis patients, plays a major role in its cutaneous dissemination and hence in the risk of infection by this microorganism. Long-term use of nasal mupirocin in haemodialysis patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus (t.i.d. for 3 to 5 days, followed by once a week) led to a decrease in the yearly incidence of S. aureus bacteraemia from 0.097 to 0.024 (p < 0.01). Tolerance was excellent. This chemoprophylaxis results in substantial savings. When applied as proposed (only nasal application), the long-term use of mupirocin only very rarely leads to the emergence of mupirocin-resistance in S. aureus (1 case in 165 patient-years).

Nasal mupirocin ointment decreases the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias in haemodialysis patients.

The incidence of S. aureus bacteraemia in a haemodialysis unit was studied over 2 years (167.75 patient-years of follow-up) during which nasal calcium mupirocin was used to eradicate nasal S. aureus carriage; this incidence was compared to that previously observed in the same unit before the use of nasal mupirocin (185.8 patient-years). Nasal mupirocin led to eradication of nasal S. aureus carriage in 96.3% of surveillance cultures and to a fourfold reduction in the incidence of S. aureus bacteraemia per patient-year, from 0.097 before mupirocin to 0.024 with mupirocin use (P = 0.008). Once or thrice weekly maintenance regimens of mupirocin were equally efficacious. The incidence of bacteraemia caused by other micro-organisms was not significantly affected. One single mupirocin-resistant isolate was identified in a nasal surveillance culture. Eradication of S. aureus from the nares did not lead to overgrowth by other micro-organisms. Chemoprophylaxis with nasal mupirocin in haemodialysis patients is cost-effective.

Iron overload in haemodialysis patients increases the risk of bacteraemia: a prospective study.

The incidence of bacteraemia in relation to the degree of transfusional iron overload was studied prospectively in patients from one haemodialysis unit over a 2-year period, with a total follow-up of 181.3 patient-years in 158 patients. Every 3 months, the patients were classified according to the serum ferritin in one of three groups: less than 500, 500-1000 or greater than 1000 micrograms/l. Twenty-nine episodes of bacteraemia were recorded over 181.3 patient-years (yearly incidence of 0.160). The yearly incidence of bacteraemia was 0.1173 and 0.1101 for ferritin less than 500 and 500-1000 micrograms/l (no significant difference), with a cumulative incidence for both groups of 0.1164. In the ferritin greater than 1000 micrograms/l group, the incidence was 0.3404 (P less than or equal to 0.005 versus the ferritin less than or equal to 1000 micrograms/l group). After stratification for patient's age (at inclusion in the study) and duration of haemodialysis therapy, the higher incidence of bacteraemia in the ferritin greater than 1000 versus less than or equal to 1000 micrograms/l groups persisted (P less than or equal to 0.005). This prospective study confirms previous retrospective studies in showing that acquired transfusional iron overload in haemodialysis is associated with a greater risk of bacteraemia.

The influence of calcium mupirocin nasal ointment on the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus infections in haemodialysis patients.

Mupirocin was used in haemodialysis patients in an attempt to eradicate nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and to prevent infection caused by this microorganism. The effectiveness of calcium mupirocin as a 2% nasal ointment OB2 (16 patients for 104 patient-months) was compared to that of placebo (18 patients for 147 patient-months) in a double-blind study. Mupirocin or placebo were applied in both anterior nares thrice daily for 2 weeks and subsequently three times weekly for a total of 9 months. During therapy, S. aureus was recovered from only 6% of the nasal cultures in the mupirocin group compared to 58% in the placebo group (P less than or equal to 0.01). Only one S. aureus infection was documented in the mupirocin group compared to six in the placebo group (P less than or equal to 0.05). The S. aureus strain causing the single infection in the mupirocin group was of a different phage type to that of the original nasal strain. In contrast, at least four of the six strains causing infection in the placebo group were of similar phage type to the original nasal strain. All S. aureus isolates remained mupirocin sensitive (MIC less than or equal to 1 mg/l). In conclusion, mupirocin nasal ointment was effective in eradicating nasal carriage of S. aureus and in preventing S. aureus infections in patients on haemodialysis.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of recombinant erythropoietin administered by the intravenous, subcutaneous, and intraperitoneal routes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.

The single dose pharmacokinetics of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) were compared in six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients after intravenous (i.v.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of 300 U/kg. Intravenous administration gave results close to those obtained in hemodialysis patients, with a half-life of 11.2 h and a volume of distribution of 5.0% of body weight. After subcutaneous administration, the serum concentration rose slowly to plateau between 24 and 36 h, the area under the serum concentration vs. time curve from 6 to 72 h being 18.2% of that after intravenous administration. After intraperitoneal administration, the serum concentration was even lower, the area under the curve from 0 to 24 h was between 2.5 and 3.6% of that after intravenous administration, and 80% of the administered dose was recovered in the first peritoneal effluent after a 4-h dwell time.

Nabumetone pharmacokinetics in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of 1 g of oral nabumetone were studied in 20 patients divided into three groups according to the creatinine clearance rate of each. Pharmacokinetic assessment was made on the presence of the major and active metabolite found in the plasma, 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid, BRL 10720. Although the differences in the kinetic parameters measured in the three groups of patients were not statistically significant, that the drug should be used with care in patients with impaired renal function until additional data are available.