Deep vein thrombosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a poorly understood complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of our analysis was to profile DVT patients with and without CKD. We defined CKD as patients requiring dialysis or patients having nephrotic syndrome. We compared 268 patients with CKD (184 patients with dialysis-dependent renal disease and 84 with nephrotic syndrome) to 4,307 patients with preserved renal function from a prospective United States multicenter deep venous thrombosis (DVT) registry. Compared with non-CKD patients, CKD patients with DVT were younger (median age 62 vs. 69 years, p < 0.0001), more often African-American (p < 0.0001), and more often Hispanic (p = 0.0003). CKD patients underwent surgery more frequently in the three months prior to developing DVT (48.9% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.001) and more often had concomitant congestive heart failure (20.9% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.005). CKD patients suffered upper extremity DVT more frequently (30.0% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.0001). Patients with CKD presented less often with typical DVT symptoms of extremity discomfort (42.9% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.003) and difficulty ambulating (5.4% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.01). Prophylaxis rates prior to DVT were similarly low in CKD and non-CKD patients (44.2% vs. 38.0%, p = 0.06). Future studies of DVT in CKD patients should explore novel strategies for improving prophylaxis utilization and the detection of DVT in this special population.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (an overview).

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia is a serious side effect of a drug that is widely used in clinical practice. All patients exposed to heparin, administered by any route or at any dose, are at varying risk of developing HIT and its potentially devastating thrombotic complications. There are two clinical forms of HIT, type I and type II. Type I HIT, is a non-immunologic response, while type II HIT is an immunologic response to heparin therapy. Type I HIT is not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and is characterized by reversible thrombocytopenia. Type II HIT occurs in approximately 1 to 3% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin. Type II HIT is more severe because of the increased risk of thrombotic events. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications may lead to amputation, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death.

Prostaglandin E1--bridge to cardiac transplantation. Technique, dosage, results.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation candidates who remain severely symptomatic despite therapy are normally hospitalized. Continuous infusion of intravenous drugs from a portable pump may allow such patients to live a fairly active life until a donor heart is found. AIM: To investigate in an open pilot study if heart transplantation can be safely accomplished if these patients are continuously bridged with various regimens including inotropic support with low-dose dobutamine in conjunction with dopamine and prostaglandin E1. METHODS: We report on 5 years' experience with prostaglandin E1, a potent vasodilator with proven efficacy in severe heart failure when coupled with catecholamines. From 1990 to 1995 54 heart transplantation candidates were bridged with prostaglandin E1 in addition to dobutamine 5 micrograms.kg-1. min-1 and dopamine 3 micrograms.kg-1 min-1 (group A; n = 32) or in addition to 3 micrograms.kg-1 min-1 dopamine alone (group B; n = 22), and 11 heart transplantation candidates were bridged with dobutamine 5 micrograms.kg-1. min-1 and dopamine 3 micrograms.kg-1 min-1 only (group C; n = 11). In an initial dose-ranging test, prostaglandin E1 was uptitrated to side effect limit (29 +/- 1 ng.kg-1.min-1). Haemodynamics, except for stroke volume index, were similar in all patients at baseline and a sufficient haemodynamic response (20% increase in stroke volume) was observed during the acute study. Fifty percent of the peak dose was used for initiating chronic therapy; the dose of prostaglandin E1 was further reduced if side effects recurred. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (54%) patients in groups A and B and six in group C could be discharged home with chronic therapy via a Hickman catheter connected to a portable pump. After 4 weeks in six patients in group A and in 13 patients in group B, when prostaglandin E1 had been reduced from 15 +/- 2 ng.kg-1.min-1 to 8 +/- 1 ng.kg-1 min-1 increases in cardiac index and decreases in systemic vascular resistance were sustained, and a permanent decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance index was observed in group B. Intravenous therapy was changed in nine patients (3/1/5) because of side effects and worsening heart failure. Prostaglandin E1 was withdrawn in three of these patients because of an increase in serum creatinine (3 mg.100 ml-1), and in one because of noncompliance. In total, there were 17 cardiac deaths (9/6/2), 42 heart transplants (22/14/6) and six (1/2/3) weaned survivors (including one non-cardiac death) in this study. Overall outcome was similar in groups A and B, but distribution after 2 months appeared to be different (P < 0.05) based on more transplantations in group A. CONCLUSION: We concluded that chronic infusions with prostaglandin E1 at reduced dosages is a feasible and safe therapeutic adjunct to bridge end-stage heart failure patients and may yield desirable effects in a subset of patients in the absence of inotropic support by dobutamine.

Acceptance of a pump-driven infusion therapy with prostaglandin E1 as a bridge to heart transplantation.

Ambulatory pump-driven intravenous infusions are a novel and - compared with hospitalization-cost-effective procedure to bridge refractory heart failure patients to cardiac transplantation. In the present study 13 patients received chronic infusions with prostaglandin E1 alone or in conjunction with catecholamines and the acceptance of this bridging therapy was investigated over a period of seven weeks. Prostaglandin E1 was uptitrated from 2.5 ng/kg/min to a maximum of 40 ng/kg/min, according to individual tolerance. 50% of the maximum tolerated dose of prostaglandin E1 was used for chronic infusion with a further dose reduction if side effects occurred. Altogether 8 patients who completed the therapy were analysed; of the remaining 5 three patients had a heart transplant, one patient died and one patient did not comply with the protocol. The drugs were administered by an automatic portable pump, which was connected to a subcutaneous tunneled catheter. During hospitalization patients and their relatives were instructed how to prepare drug solutions and to handle the infusion system. Patients' perceptions were investigated by visual analog scale questionnaires (rating scale zero to ten) before, and at weekly intervals during bridging therapy. Initial acceptance was documented as belief in therapy (9.4 +/- 1.2 SD), absence of fear of handling the pump (8.9 +/- 1.2 SD) and confidence of receiving help of close relatives (8.7 +/- 1.8 SD). During the observation period there were no statistically significant differences compared with this favorable starting position and no significant disruption of life style occurred. Pain in the joints-a prostaglandin E1-associated side effect-increased significantly (p < 0.05) at week 5, but returned to baseline levels during the following two weeks. At study end patients confirmed that they would repeat the experience (7.6 +/- 1.4 SD) and advise other patients to undergo this form of therapy (8.2 +/- 1.9 SD). Thus, this pilot study suggests that ambulatory pump-driven intravenous infusion therapy comprising prostaglandin E1 and catecholamines is acceptable to patients as a bridge to heart transplantation and that there should be no major difficulties regarding compliance.

Knotting of two central venous catheters: a rare complication of pulmonary artery catheterization.

An attempt was made to insert a balloon-tipped pulmonary arterial catheter (Swan-Ganz catheter) in a patient in cardiogenic shock during circulatory support by intraaortic balloon pumping, with a right jugular central venous catheter in place. Due to the low cardiac output it was impossible to advance the catheter tip into the pulmonary artery and after several futile attempts it was decided to withdraw the catheter. However, this was impossible because a knot had formed between the central venous catheter and the Swan-Ganz catheter and surgical removal become necessary. This is the first report on intravasal knot formation between two different catheters. This rare complication has to be included in the long list of complications associated with Swan Ganz catheterisation.

ICD therapy in survivors of sudden cardiac death awaiting heart transplantation.

The impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy on survival of heart transplant candidates is of major socioeconomic and ethical interest. However, efficacy is even uncertain for patients at highest risk of tachyarrhythmic death on the waiting list. We studied 60 selected heart transplant candidates (mean age, 55.8 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.15; functional class III and IV) with a history of successful resuscitation by external electric defibrillation for spontaneous, syncopal ventricular tachyarrhythmia during the study period from March 1992 through September 1994. At the time of registration for transplantation, 30 patients had ICD devices implanted, whereas 30 patients lacked ICD therapy for various nonmedical reasons. Both therapy groups were comparable in clinical and hemodynamic characteristics as well as in intention to transplant (median waiting time to transplantation, 5.7 and 6 months, respectively; not significant by log-rank method). Survival on the waiting list was significantly improved by ICD therapy; only 1 of the 30 ICD patients (19 transplanted) but 7 of the 30 non-ICD patients (14 transplanted) died on the waiting list (p < 0.05 by log-rank method). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy did not affect survival after transplantation as compared with non-ICD patients (not significant by log-rank method). During the waiting time, 26 of the ICD patients (87%) experienced adequate ICD discharges, and 12 of the non-ICD patients were treated successfully by external electric defibrillation (40%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Strategies in management of heart transplantation candidates with tachycardic ventricular arrhythmia anamnesis]. / Strategien zum Management von Herztransplantationskandidaten mit der Anamnese tachykarder ventrikulärer Rhythmusstörungen.

We followed up 73 consecutive patients with a history of syncopal ventricular tachyarrhythmias on the waiting list for a heart transplant between 1st March 1992 and 15th September 1994 with the aim of evaluating the impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on survival. On registration 60 patients were considered fit enough to be ambulant whilst awaiting transplantation. 30 were given ICD therapy (group 1) and 30 were not (group 2). 13 patients required inpatient supervision for ventricular arrhythmias whilst awaiting transplantation, but received no ICD therapy (group 3). The 13 in-patients were in a worse clinical state (NYHA) than the 30 out-patients not given ICD (p < 0.05). With respect to all other clinical and hemodynamic characteristics all groups were comparable. Waiting time for transplantation was also comparable in all groups (n.s., log-rank method). ICD therapy resulted in a significant improvement of survival in these high-risk patients prior to transplantation. Only 1 out of the 30 ICD patients (group 2) and 5 out of the 13 in-patients (group 3) (p < 0.05 log-rank method). During the waiting time group 3 patients were hospitalised longest (p < 0.05), but there was a clear trend that also ICD patients had to be hospitalised to an increased extent (n.s.). Cox multivariate regression analysis of this study population showed that the cardiac index (p = 0.001) and lack of ICD therapy (p = 0.035) were the only independent significant predictors of mortality on the waiting list. ICD therapy had no influence on mortality after transplantation (n.s. log-rank method).