Factors Impacting Clinically Relevant RNA Fusion Assays Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

CONTEXT.­: RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays are being used with increasing frequency for comprehensive molecular profiling of solid tumors. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate factors that might impact clinical assay performance. DESIGN.­: A 4-month retrospective review of cases analyzed by a targeted RNA-based NGS assay to detect fusions was performed. RNA extraction was performed from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and/or cytology smears of 767 cases, including 493 in-house and 274 outside referral cases. The types of samples included 422 core needle biopsy specimens (55%), 268 resection specimens (35%), and 77 cytology samples (10%). RESULTS.­: Successful NGS fusion testing was achieved in 697 specimens (90.9%) and correlated positively with RNA yield (P < .001) and negatively with specimen necrosis (P = .002), decalcification (P < .001), and paraffin block age of more than 2 years (P = .001). Of the 697 cases that were successfully sequenced, 50 (7.2%) had clinically relevant fusions. The testing success rates and fusion detection rates were similar between core needle biopsy and cytology samples. In contrast, RNA fusion testing was often less successful using resection specimens (P = .007). Testing success was independent of the tumor percentage in the specimen, given that at least 20% tumor cellularity was present. CONCLUSIONS.­: The success of RNA-based NGS testing is multifactorial and is influenced by RNA quality and quantity. Identification of preanalytical factors affecting RNA quality and yield can improve NGS testing success rates.

Utilization of cytology smears improves success rates of RNA-based next-generation sequencing gene fusion assays for clinically relevant predictive biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: The use of RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays to detect gene fusions for targeted therapy has rapidly become an essential component of comprehensive molecular profiling. For cytology specimens, the cell block (CB) is most commonly used for fusion testing; however, insufficient cellularity and/or suboptimal RNA quality are often limiting factors. In the current study, the authors evaluated the factors affecting RNA fusion testing in cytology and the added value of smears in cases with a suboptimal or inadequate CB. METHODS: A 12-month retrospective review was performed to identify cytology cases that were evaluated by a targeted RNA-based NGS assay. Samples were sequenced by targeted amplicon-based NGS for 51 clinically relevant genes on a proprietary platform. Preanalytic factors and NGS quality parameters were correlated with the results of RNA fusion testing. RESULTS: The overall success rate of RNA fusion testing was 92%. Of the 146 cases successfully sequenced, 14% had a clinically relevant fusion detected. NGS testing success positively correlated with RNA yield (P = .03) but was independent of the tumor fraction, the tumor size, or the number of slides used for extraction. CB preparations were adequate for testing in 45% cases, but the inclusion of direct smears increased the adequacy rate to 92%. There was no significant difference in testing success rates between smears and CB preparations. CONCLUSIONS: The success of RNA-based NGS fusion testing depends on the quality and quantity of RNA extracted. The use of direct smears significantly improves the adequacy of cytologic samples for RNA fusion testing for predictive biomarkers.

Identification of Factors Affecting the Success of Next-Generation Sequencing Testing in Solid Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical laboratories are rapidly implementing next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests for mutation analysis, but there are few guidelines regarding sample quality for successful results. METHODS: We aimed to establish tissue quality parameters for successful NGS in solid tumors and to improve NGS performance. RESULTS: Analysis of 614 clinical cases tested in 2013 using a 50-gene hotspot mutation panel identified the major cause for unsuccessful NGS analysis was DNA less than 10 ng (91%, 67/74) associated with extremely small and low cellularity samples. High success rates were associated with resection procedures (333/342, 97%) and biopsied tumor larger than 10 mm(2) (77/77, 100%). NGS can be successfully performed on bone specimens processed with formic acid-based decalcification procedures (8/11, 73%). Tumor type and paraffin block age did not affect success. We demonstrated that NGS can be carried out on samples with less than 10 ng DNA. Analysis of 408 cases tested in 2014 using an optimized workflow showed improved NGS success rates from 88% to 95% (387/408) with pronounced improvement among tiny (<10 mm(2)) samples (from 76% to 94%) as well as cytology samples (from 58% to 87%). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying preanalytical tissue factors allows us to improve NGS performance and to successfully test tumors obtained from minimally invasive procedures.