Use of antiplatelet therapy in a diabetic outpatient service of a large urban public hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cardiovascular disease is the most important cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes. Aspirin treatment is effective in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease and it does not significantly increase the risk of retinal haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding or hemorrhagic stroke. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends the use of aspirin in all adult patients with diabetes and macrovascular disease, and suggests to start treatment with aspirin for primary prevention in diabetic patients >or=40 years of age and with one or more other cardiovascular risk factors in the absence of specific contraindications. METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, we have selected from our database (17,732 clinical reports) all the type 2 diabetic patients 41--80 years of age, who had at least one visit to our outpatient service in the following two periods: A (from 1 July 1995 to 30 June 1996) and B (from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2003), then analysed the patient-records for prescription of antiplatelet agents. RESULTS: Our analysis has shown that antiplatelet agents were prescribed to 15% of the type 2 diabetic patients in period A (10.8% and 53.4% -- primary and secondary prevention, respectively) and to 22.8% of the patients in period B (19.1% and 60.5% -- primary and secondary prevention, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk are not always under antiplatelet treatment despite the ADA recommendations, particularly for primary prevention. However, our data show an increased trend in prescriptions from 1997, when the first ADA specific guidelines for aspirin therapy were published.

The grafted kidney takes over: disappearance of the nephrotic syndrome after preemptive pancreas-kidney and kidney transplantation in diabetic nephropathy.

This report describes the rapid and complete reversal of proteinuria after preemptive transplantation in diabetic nephropathy. Case 1 was a 42-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes (before pancreas-kidney graft: serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL and proteinuria 9.1 g/day; 1 month after pancreas-kidney graft: proteinuria 0.3 g/day and creatinine 1.3 mg/dL). Case 2 was a 48-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (before kidney graft: creatinine 2 mg/dL and proteinuria 5.9 g/day; 1 month after: proteinuria 0.7 g/day and creatinine 1.1 mg/dL). The proteinuria pattern changed (pre: glomerular nonselective, tubular complete; post: physiologic). Renal scintiscan (99mTC-MAG3) demonstrated functional exclusion of the native kidneys, despite high pretransplant clearance (> 50 mL/min). The effect was not linked to euglycemia or readily explainable by pharmacologic effects (no difference in renal parameters after pancreas transplantation with the same protocols). These data confirm the efficacy of preemptive kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation in diabetic nephrotic syndrome and indicate that a regulatory hemodynamic effect should be investigated.

Referral of type 1 diabetic patients to a nephrology unit: will pre-emptive transplantation change our life?

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetic patients are a small but challenging subset of chronic kidney disease. The new frontiers of pancreas-kidney transplantation may enhance the need for early referral. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the referral pattern of type 1 diabetics to a specialized Nephrology Unit, and to quantify the indications for pancreas or pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation at referral in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Setting of study was a Nephrology Outpatient Unit, dedicated to diabetics, active since 1986; period of study 1991--2002. The main biochemical and clinical parameters were analyzed at referral. Indications for transplantation were put at: serum creatinine (sCr)> or =2 mg/dL or > or =3 mg/dL and/or nephrotic syndrome. Pancreas: lesser degrees of functional impairment without worsening after FK-506 challenge. RESULTS: 90 type 1 diabetics were referred: 48 males, 42 females; median age: 38 (18-65) years; median diabetological follow-up 20 (3-37) years; sCr 1.2 (0.6-7) mg/dL, proteinuria 0.9 (0-12.3) g/day; creatinine clearance: 58 (6-234) ml/min; Hbalc: 8.8% (5.9-14), diastolic blood pressure: 80 (55-100) mmHg, systolic blood pressure: 137.5 (70-180) mmHg. 85.6% had signs of end-organ damage due to diabetes. 67% of the patients had diabetic nephropathy, 20.7% hypertensive with or without diabetic nephropathy. According to the chosen criteria, 30.6% had indications for pancreas-kidney graft (sCr > or = 2 mg/dL), 25.9% considering sCr > or = 3 mg/dL; 28.2% further patients could be considered for isolated pancreas graft. CONCLUSIONS: At referral to the nephrologist, over 50% of type 1 diabetics may have indications for pancreas-kidney or pancreas graft; an earlier multidisciplinary work-up is needed to optimize an early pre-emptive transplant approach.

Low-protein vegetarian diet with alpha-chetoanalogues prior to pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation is increasingly considered the best therapy for irreversible chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 1 diabetics. However, the best approach in the wait for transplantation has not yet been defined. AIM: To evaluate our experience with a low-protein (0.6 g/kg/day) vegetarian diet supplemented with alpha-chetoanalogues in type 1 diabetic patients in the wait for pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prospective study. Information on the progression of renal disease, compliance, metabolic control, reasons for choice and for drop-out were recorded prospectively; the data for the subset of patients who underwent the diet while awaiting a pancreas-kidney graft are analysed in this report. RESULTS: From November 1998 to April 2004, 9 type 1 diabetic patients, wait-listed or performing tests for wait-listing for pancreas-kidney transplantation, started the diet. All of them were followed by nephrologists and diabetologists, in the context of integrated care. There were 4 males and 5 females; median age 38 years (range 27.9-45.5); median diabetes duration 23.8 years (range 16.6-33.1), 8/9 with widespread organ damage; median creatinine at the start of the diet: 3.2 mg/dl (1.2-7.2); 4 patients followed the diet to transplantation, 2 are presently on the diet, 2 dropped out and started dialysis after a few months, 1 started dialysis (rescue treatment). The nutritional status remained stable, glycemia control improved in 4 patients in the short term and in 2 in the long term, no hyperkalemia, acidosis or other relevant side effect was recorded. Proteinuria decreased in 5 cases, in 3 from the nephrotic range. Albumin levels remained stable; the progression rate was a loss of 0.47 ml/min of creatinine clearance per month (ranging from an increase of 0.06 to a decrease of 2.4 ml/min) during the diet period (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula). CONCLUSIONS: Low-protein supplemented vegetarian diets may be a useful tool to slow CKD progression whilst awaiting pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Early referral of Type 2 diabetic patients: are we ready for the assault?

BACKGROUND: Elderly diabetics on dialysis are dramatically increasing in number. Their late referral reduces efficacy of therapeutic interventions; early referral is fundamental for their survival on dialysis. However, need for nephrological follow-up in case of early referral is not assessed. The objective was to define the need for follow-up in the nephrology setting of Type 2 diabetics, according to the early referral criteria of serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl or macroproteinuria. METHODS: The setting of the study was an outpatient diabetic care unit (University of Torino), where approximately 25% of the Type 2 diabetics of a 900,000-inhabitant city (Torino, Northern Italy) were followed. At the time of the study (1998-1999) the unit followed 5182 Type 2 diabetics whose serum creatinine and proteinuria were tested at least yearly. A total of 3826 prevalent and 478 incident patients with one or more analyses in the same laboratory were included in the study. Demographic data were not statistically different between selected and excluded patients. We calculated the stepwise need for nephrological follow-ups calculated according to our usual policy (4-12 evaluations/ year, on serum creatinine and proteinuria, and 30 min/evaluation). RESULTS: The prevalence of increased serum creatinine and macroproteinuria was high (in the prevalent cohort: serum creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl, 8.1%; proteinuria 0.3 g/day, 25.2%; serum creatinine > or = 3 mg/dl, 1.2%; nephrotic proteinuria 3.4%). Projecting data to the entire unit, with adherence to our evaluation protocol, early nephrological follow-up of Type 2 diabetics requires approximately 1300 h/year (one full-time nephrologist); five nephrologists are needed for our city, and 24 for the region (4350 000 inhabitants). CONCLUSIONS: Early nephrological referral and follow-up of Type 2 diabetics is time consuming and expensive. Meeting the outpatient care needs of this critical cohort requires considerable resources.