Proteome reveals antiviral host response and NETosis during acute COVID-19 in high-risk patients

SARS-CoV-2 remains an acute threat to human health, endangering hospital capacities worldwide. Many studies have aimed at informing pathophysiologic understanding and identification of disease indicators for risk assessment, monitoring, and therapeutic guidance. While findings start to emerge in the general population, observations in high-risk patients with complex pre-existing conditions are limited. To this end, we biomedically characterized quantitative proteomics in a hospitalized cohort of COVID-19 patients with mild to severe symptoms suffering from different (co)-morbidities in comparison to both healthy individuals and patients with non-COVID related inflammation. Deep clinical phenotyping enabled the identification of individual disease trajectories in COVID-19 patients. By the use of this specific disease phase assignment, proteome analysis revealed a severity dependent general type-2 centered host response side-by-side with a disease specific antiviral immune reaction in early disease. The identification of phenomena such as neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and a pro-coagulatory response together with the regulation of proteins related to SARS-CoV-2-specific symptoms by unbiased proteome screening both confirms results from targeted approaches and provides novel information for biomarker and therapy development. Graphical AbstractSars-CoV-2 remains a challenging threat to our health care system with many pathophysiological mechanisms not fully understood, especially in high-risk patients. Therefore, we characterized a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with multiple comorbidities by quantitative plasma proteomics and deep clinical phenotyping. The individual patients disease progression was determined and the subsequently assigned proteome profiles compared with a healthy and a chronically inflamed control cohort. The identified disease phase and severity specific protein profiles revealed an antiviral immune response together with coagulation activation indicating the formation of NETosis side-by-side with tissue remodeling related to the inflammatory signature. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=197 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/22271106v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (50K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e791faorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@20d3d6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1339e42org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1db3710_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

High-resolution longitudinal serum proteome trajectories in COVID-19 reveal patients-specific seroconversion

Biomarkers for COVID-19 are urgently needed. Here we bring the powerful technology of mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to bear on this challenge. We measured serum proteomes of COVID-19 patients and symptomatic, but PCR-negative controls, in a time-resolved manner. In 262 controls and 458 longitudinal samples (average of 31 days) of 31 patients, hospitalized for COVID-19, a remarkable 26% of proteins changed significantly. Bioinformatics analyses revealed co-regulated groups and shared biological functions. Proteins of the innate immune system such as CRP, SAA1, CD14, LBP and LGALS3BP decreased early in the time course. In contrast, regulators of coagulation (APOH, FN1, HRG, KNG1, PLG) and lipid homeostasis (APOA1, APOC1, APOC2, APOC3, PON1) increased over the course of the disease. A global correlation map provides a systems-wide functional association between proteins, biological processes and clinical chemistry parameters. Importantly, five SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays against antibodies revealed excellent correlations with an extensive range of immunoglobulin regions, which were quantified by MS-based proteomics. The high-resolution profile of all immunoglobulin regions showed individual-specific differences and commonalities of potential pathophysiological relevance. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=198 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21252236v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (86K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4f1770org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8bdc12org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d4e21org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f49622_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIA total of 720 proteomes of 262 symptomatic controls and 458 longitudinal samples (average 31 days) of hospitalized COVID-19 cases were analyzed C_LIO_LI26% of the 502 quantified proteins significantly changed in COVID-19 patients C_LIO_LIThe innate immune and the coagulation system were strongly regulated C_LIO_LIMS-based profiles of immunoglobulin regions allow the detection of seroconversion in a highly detailed fashion on the patient level C_LIO_LIITIH4 may be a prospective marker of COVID-19 mortality C_LI

SARS-CoV-2 antibody immunoassays in serial samples reveal earlier seroconversion in acutely ill COVID-19 patients developing ARDS

ObjectivesDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has been suggested for (1) screening populations for disease prevalence, (2) diagnostics, and (3) guiding therapeutic applications. Here, we conducted a detailed clinical evaluation of four Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays in samples from acutely ill COVID-19 patients and in two negative cohorts. Methods443 serum specimens from serial sampling of 29 COVID-19 patients were used to determine clinical sensitivities. Patients were stratified for the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Individual serum specimens from a pre-COVID-19 cohort of 238 healthy subjects and from a PCR-negative clinical cohort of 257 patients were used to determine clinical specificities. All samples were measured side-by-side with the Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgG), Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgA) and Anti-SARS-CoV-2-NCP-ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun AG, Lubeck, Germany) and the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ECLIA (Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). ResultsMedian seroconversion occurred earlier in ARDS patients (8-9 days) than in non-ARDS patients (11-17 days), except for EUR N-IgG. Rates of positivity and mean signal ratios in the ARDS group were significantly higher than in the non-ARDS group. Sensitivities between the four tested immunoassays were equivalent. In the set of negative samples, the specificity of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA (IgA) was lower (93.9 %) compared to all other assays ([≥]98.8 %) and the specificity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2-NCP-ELISA (IgG) was lower (98.8 %) than that of Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (100 %). ConclusionsSerial sampling in COVID-19 patients revealed earlier seroconversion and higher signal ratios of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as a potential risk marker for the development of ARDS, suggesting a utility for antibody testing in acutely diseased patients.