Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Immunol ; 13: 915338, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36059441

RESUMO

Background: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has been keeping the world in suspense. Rapid tests, molecular diagnosis of acute infections, and vaccination campaigns with vaccines are building blocks of strategic pandemic control worldwide. For laboratory diagnostics, the quantification of the antibody titer of convalescents and vaccinated patients is thus increasingly coming to the fore. Methods: Here we present an evaluation on the comparability of five serological tests on a cohort of 13 patients with mild COVID-19 disease. Also participants who were vaccinated after recovery were included in this study. All common immune methods (ELISA, CLIA, PETIA) and SARS-CoV-2 specific antigens (N-, S1- and RBD-) were specifically tracked and directly compared for up to 455 days. The titer of recovered participants was also set to the degree of symptoms during infection and the occurrence of Long-COVID. In addition, relative comparability of different serological tests, all standardized to WHO, was set in reference to the neutralizing potential of the corresponding participants. Findings: The individual immune responses over 455 days after a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection remain stable, in contrast to vaccinated participants. All sero-tests reveal comparable performance and dynamics during the study and compared well to a surrogate neutralization test. Conclusion: The information presented here will help clinicians in the daily laboratory work in the selection and evaluation of different serological tests offered. The data also will support in respect of a sero-test-based neutralization cutoff.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda
2.
Neurosci Lett ; 409(1): 1-4, 2006 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17045397

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Currently, neurochemical dementia diagnostics (NDD) are increasingly entering routine clinical neurochemistry, offering improved early and differential diagnosis of dementias. However, there is an obvious lack of standardization in pre-analytical sample handling and systematic quality surveys. Therefore, in this study, 14 laboratories in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland were given aliquots of a human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, and were asked to measure Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers (amyloid beta (Abeta) peptides, total Tau protein, and phosphorylated Tau protein (P-tau(181P))) according to their routine protocols. RESULTS: The inter-laboratory coefficients of variation of the results obtained by the laboratories participating in this study were in the range of 20-30%. Although the results of this quality control survey are promising, the quality of measurements has to be further optimized.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Peptídeos beta-Amiloides/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Biomarcadores , Coleta de Dados , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Indicadores e Reagentes , Fosforilação , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Proteínas tau/líquido cefalorraquidiano
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...