Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 39(4): 1247-1256, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32488361

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Standard prone position (PP) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has multiple drawbacks. We aimed to compare PNLs performed in split-leg (SL) modified lateral position (MLP) and those performed in standard PP. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, unblind, double arm trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center in Egypt, between November 2017 and October 2019. Adult patients with renal stones undergoing PNL were included. According to renal anatomy and stone complexity, stratified randomization was performed and study participants were allocated into either SL-MLP group or PP group. The stone free rate (SFR), total operative time, track formation time, fluoroscopy time, auxiliary procedures, and complications were compared. RESULTS: There were 61 patients in SL-MLP group and 63 patients in PP group. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The SFR was comparable between groups: 75.4% in SL-MLP group and 77.8% in PP group (p = 0.755). The mean total operative time was shorter and mean track formation time was longer in SL-MLP group (55.33 ± 20.73 vs. 98.49 ± 9.23, p < 0.001 and 7.89 ± 3.68 vs. 6.52 ± 1.77, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, total complication rates, hemoglobin reduction and need for blood transfusion between the groups. In SL-MLP group, all PNL procedures as well all the associated procedures were performed with the patients in the same position. CONCLUSION: SL-MLP PNL has a short operative time and similar SFR and complication rate compared to PP PNL. SL-MLP allowed antegrade and retrograde access to the urinary tract without patient repositioning.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Decúbito Ventral , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Andrologia ; 50(8): e13073, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29917254

RESUMO

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between haemodialysis (HD) duration and erectile function status and gonadal hormones serum levels in adult men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A total of 118 men with ESRD on chronic HD were eligible for analysis. The erectile dysfunction (ED) was defined and graded according to the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) score. The serum levels of follicle stimulating hormones (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), testosterone (TST), prolactin (PRL) and estradiol (E2) were measured using the standard laboratory technique. The mean age was 48.97 ± 14.68 years and mean duration of HD was 4.58 ± 3.03 years. The overall prevalence of ED was 78.8%; from them 31.2% had severe grade. The prevalence of ED was comparable in HD duration categories [≤5 years (79.7%), 5-10 years (76.5%), >10 years (80.0%); p > 0.05]. The percentage of abnormal serum levels of FSH, LH, TST, PRL, E2 were 5.1%, 1.6%, 18.6%, 90.7% and 0.0% respectively. No significant relationships were observed between HD duration and IIEF-5 score or gonadal hormones serum levels (p < 0.05). We concluded that HD duration has no effect on erectile function status and gonadal hormones serum levels. Other factors may be relevant to these conditions in this particular group of patients.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Egito/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/sangue , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/sangue , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Diálise Renal
3.
Urol Int ; 98(4): 411-417, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27871076

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of adjunctive tamsulosin therapy in improving the success rate of laser-assisted semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) for removing proximal ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 165 patients with proximal ureteral stones ≥10 mm. The patients were randomly assigned to a tamsulosin group (Group I, n = 81) receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily for 1 week pre-URS and a control group (Group II, n = 84) without tamsulosin therapy. Treatment consisted of URS using a semi-rigid ureteroscope (7.5 Fr), followed by intracorporeal holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. The patients were followed up regularly for 8 weeks after URS. RESULTS: The operative time was 43.4 and 49.6 min in Groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.001). Scope to stone access rate was 93.8 and 82.1% in patients of Groups I and II, respectively (p = 0.022). The stone-free rate was significantly higher in Group I compared to Group II (74/81; 91.4% vs. 67/84; 79.8%; p = 0.035). The complication rate was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II (17.3 vs. 38.1%, p = 0.003). Only minor complications were encountered and were managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin therapy prior to semi-rigid URS improved ureteroscopic access to proximal ureteral stones, thus leading to an increased success rate and low morbidity.


Assuntos
Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscópios , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Litotripsia a Laser , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tansulosina , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureteroscopia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...