Prevalence and risk of thrombocytopenia with valproic acid: experience at a psychiatric teaching hospital.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors of thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients receiving valproic acid (VPA) for psychiatric indications (excluding epilepsy). DESIGN: Retrospective study SETTING: University-affiliated psychiatric facility. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-four patients treated with VPA. INTERVENTION: Data from patients hospitalized between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998, who were receiving VPA and had at least one platelet count recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 264 VPA-treated patients, 31 (12%) met our criteria for thrombocytopenia. Mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count of 101-150 x 10(3)/mm3) occurred in 25 (9%) patients, and moderate thrombocytopenia (platelet count of 40-100 x 103/mm3) occurred in 6 (2%) patients. Age older than 65 years (p=0.02) and VPA dosage greater than 1,000 mg/day (p<0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for developing thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of thrombocytopenia is 12% in the general psychiatric population receiving VPA, with the elderly at greatest risk.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic therapy in a naturalistic setting: a comparison between risperidone, perphenazine, and haloperidol.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic ineffectiveness and noncompliance with antipsychotic agents are major contributors to rehospitalization in patients with psychotic disorders. It is unknown whether risperidone's favorable side effect profile compared with that of the conventional antipsychotics results in improved compliance and reduced hospitalizations in a naturalistic setting. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment with risperidone reduces readmission rates and associated costs when compared with treatment with perphenazine or haloperidol. METHOD: Inpatients prescribed either risperidone, perphenazine, or haloperidol between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, as a single oral antipsychotic at discharge were retrospectively identified. Data were collected for that index hospitalization and for a 1-year follow-up period. Primary outcome measures included re-admission rates, changes in antipsychotic therapy, anticholinergic drug use, and costs. RESULTS: There were 202 evaluable patients (81 treated with risperidone, 78 with perphenazine, and 43 with haloperidol). Baseline demographics were similar between groups except that more patients in the risperidone group had a primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder or had been hospitalized in the year prior to study. The percentage of patients readmitted during the 1-year follow-up period was similar among drug groups (41% risperidone, 26% perphenazine, and 35% haloperidol) when controlled for baseline differences in diagnosis and hospitalization history (p = .32). Anticholinergic drug use was more common in the haloperidol group (p = .004). Mean yearly cost (drug + hospitalization) in the risperidone group was $20,317, nearly double that in the other treatment groups (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The results from this naturalistic study indicate that the high cost of risperidone is not offset by a reduction in readmission rates when compared with conventional antipsychotics.