Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

PURPOSE: To prospectively and intraindividually compare 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine with 0.2 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was granted by each of three participating centers. The study accorded with international standards for good clinical practice and Declaration of Helsinki and subsequent amendments. Patients gave written informed consent before enrollment. Patients (n = 34) underwent two MR angiographic examinations more than 48 hours but less than 12 days apart. Gadobenate dimeglumine followed by gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered in 18 patients; the order of administration was reversed in 16 patients. A 1.5-T MR imager was used with a phase-encoded three-dimensional spoiled breath-hold pulse sequence. Two blinded independent readers qualitatively assessed randomized subtracted maximum intensity projection images. A three-point scale for diagnostic quality (0, poor; 1a or 1p, moderate; and 2a or 2p, adequate [a and p refer, respectively, to absence and presence of vascular lesions]) was used to score each of nine segments of the abdominal aorta and both renal arteries (possible overall score, 18). Quantitative assessment (vessel signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], vessel-muscle contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) of source images was performed for regions of interest in supra-, juxta-, and infrarenal aorta segments and psoas muscle. Data were tested with analysis of variance for two-period crossover design. Interreader agreement was evaluated with Cohen kappa statistics. RESULTS: No difference in mean image quality between the two contrast agents was observed; scores for gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine were 15.15 and 15.23 for reader 1 and 16.77 and 17.01 for reader 2. The order of contrast material administration likewise produced no quality differences: readers 1 and 2 reported scores of 14.4 +/- 4.2 (standard deviation) and 16.7 +/- 2.3, respectively, when gadobenate dimeglumine was given first, and 15.2 +/- 1.8 and 16.6 +/- 1.6, respectively, when gadopentetate dimeglumine was given first. Results of quantitative evaluation showed increasing SNR and CNR with gadobenate dimeglumine in segments at progressively lower levels of the aorta, but increases in SNR and CNR at the infrarenal aorta (48.3 vs 40.6 and 44.2 vs 36.4, respectively) were not significant (P = .05 for both). CONCLUSION: Gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg is comparable to gadopentetate dimeglumine at 0.2 mmol/kg for contrast-enhanced renal MR angiography.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the pelvic arteries.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 4 doses of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pelvic arteries and to compare CE-MRA with unenhanced time-of-flight MRA (2D-TOF-MRA). METHODS: A multicenter Phase II dose-finding study was performed in 136 patients with Gd-BOPTA doses of 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mmol/kg bodyweight. Evaluation of CE-MRA images and comparison with 2D-TOF-MRA images was performed onsite and by 2 blinded offsite reviewers in terms of subjective image quality, number of lesions detected, and confidence in lesion characterization. RESULTS: Significant (P < 0.05) improvements over unenhanced findings were observed for CE-MRA at all dose levels. For reviewer 1 and the onsite investigators, the overall image quality increased up to a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg and then plateaued. For reviewer 2, increased image quality was noted up to a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg. Significant (P < 0.005) increases in diagnostic confidence on CE-MRA versus unenhanced MRA was observed for all dose groups by reviewer 1 and the onsite investigators and for the 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg dose groups by reviewer 2. No serious adverse events were recorded that were attributable to the study drug and no trends in laboratory parameters, vital signs, or electrocardiogram recordings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRA is safe and significantly more effective than unenhanced 2D-TOF-MRA for imaging the pelvic arteries. A dose of 0.1 mmol/kg appears the most appropriate dose for subsequent Phase III clinical evaluation.

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of four different doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with suspected abnormality of the abdominal aorta or renal arteries underwent unenhanced three-dimensional gradient-recalled echo time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography after the IV injection of one of four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mmol/kg of body weight). Efficacy was assessed on-site and by two blinded off-site reviewers in terms of change in total diagnostic quality score and diagnostic quality score per vessel segment from baseline unenhanced time-of-flight MR angiography to contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Secondary efficacy end points included lesion count and level of confidence in lesion characterization. Safety assessments comprised adverse event monitoring, physical evaluation, vital signs, ECG, and laboratory investigations. RESULTS: A significant change in the total diagnostic quality score from unenhanced to contrast-enhanced MR angiography was observed at all doses. The change increased with increased dose, plateauing at the 0.1 mmol/kg dose level. More patients with lesions detected and increased reviewer confidence for lesion characterization were noted on contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with unenhanced MR angiography, although no dose-related trends were observed. All doses were well tolerated, and no significant changes in safety parameters were observed. CONCLUSION: Gadobenate dimeglumine is an effective and safe agent for contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. A dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight appears to be the most suitable.