PTEN alterations in sporadic and BRCA1-associated triple negative breast carcinomas.

The similarities between sporadic basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) and BRCA1-mutated breast tumours raise the possibility that deregulation of the same pathway may underlie these tumour types. The aim of this study was to determine if PTEN aberrations are characteristic of both BRCA1 tumours and sporadic TN breast carcinomas with low BRCA1 expression, and can thus be used to identify sporadic tumours potentially sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Twelve BRCA1 tumours, 19 non-BRCA familial breast tumours and 71 unselected TN breast carcinomas were screened for PTEN mutations and assessed for PTEN expression and BRCA1 mRNA expression. Loss of PTEN expression was observed in 67% of BRCA1 tumours and more specifically in 89% of TN BRCA1 tumours highlighting the link between PTEN loss and BLBC in the context of germline BRCA1 mutations. Regarding unselected TN tumours, 56% showed PTEN expression loss and 35% displayed low BRCA1 mRNA expression. Unlike familial breast cancers with low BRCA1 mRNA expression, no significant correlation was observed between the loss of PTEN expression and low BRCA1 mRNA expression in this unselected TN tumours panel. Our data suggest that, unlike the germinal context, PTEN and BRCA1 alterations in sporadic TN breast tumours are independent events.

RNA sequencing validation of the Complexity INdex in SARComas prognostic signature.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of metastatic outcome in soft tissue sarcomas is an important clinical challenge since these tumours can be very aggressive (up to 50% of recurring events). A gene expression signature, Complexity INdex in SARComas (CINSARC), has been identified as a better prognostic factor compared to the current international grading system defined by the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Since CINSARC has been established on frozen tumours analysed by microarrays, we were interested in evaluating its prognostic capacity using next generation sequencing (NGS) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks to better fit laboratory practices. METHODS: Metastatic-free survivals (training/validation approach with independent datasets) and agreement values in classification groups were evaluated. Also, RNA degradation threshold has been established for FFPE blocks and differences in gene expression due to RNA degradation were measured. RESULTS: CINSARC remains a strong prognostic factor for metastatic outcome in both microarray and RNA-seq technologies (P < 0.05), with similar risk-group classifications (77%). We defined quality threshold to process degraded RNA extracted from FFPE blocks and measured similar classifications with frozen tumours (88%). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that CINSARC is a platform and material independent prognostic signature for metastatic outcome in various sarcomas. This result opens access to metastatic prognostication in sarcomas through NGS analysis on both frozen and FFPE tumours via the CINSARC signature.

Impact of chromosomal instability on colorectal cancer progression and outcome.

BACKGROUND: It remains presently unclear whether disease progression in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), from early, to invasive and metastatic forms, is associated to a gradual increase in genetic instability and to a scheme of sequentially occurring Copy Number Alterations (CNAs). METHODS: In this work we set to determine the existence of such links between CRC progression and genetic instability and searched for associations with patient outcome. To this aim we analyzed a set of 162 Chromosomal Instable (CIN) CRCs comprising 131 primary carcinomas evenly distributed through stage 1 to 4, 31 metastases and 14 adenomas by array-CGH. CNA profiles were established according to disease stage and compared. We, also, asked whether the level of genomic instability was correlated to disease outcome in stage 2 and 3 CRCs. Two metrics of chromosomal instability were used; (i) Global Genomic Index (GGI), corresponding to the fraction of the genome involved in CNA, (ii) number of breakpoints (nbBP). RESULTS: Stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 tumors did not differ significantly at the level of their CNA profiles precluding the conventional definition of a progression scheme based on increasing levels of genetic instability. Combining GGI and nbBP,we classified genomic profiles into 5 groups presenting distinct patterns of chromosomal instability and defined two risk classes of tumors, showing strong differences in outcome and hazard risk (RFS: p = 0.012, HR = 3; OS: p < 0.001, HR = 9.7). While tumors of the high risk group were characterized by frequent fractional CNAs, low risk tumors presented predominantly whole chromosomal arm CNAs. Searching for CNAs correlating with negative outcome we found that losses at 16p13.3 and 19q13.3 observed in 10% (7/72) of stage 2-3 tumors showed strong association with early relapse (p < 0.001) and death (p < 0.007, p < 0.016). Both events showed frequent co-occurrence (p < 1x10-8) and could, therefore, mark for stage 2-3 CRC susceptible to negative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that CRC disease progression from stage 1 to stage 4 is not paralleled by increased levels of genetic instability. However, they suggest that stage 2-3 CRC with elevated genetic instability and particularly profiles with fractional CNA represent a subset of aggressive tumors.

Mitotic checkpoints and chromosome instability are strong predictors of clinical outcome in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: The importance of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the oncogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is well established, but the genetic basis of GIST metastasis is poorly understood. We recently published a 67 gene expression prognostic signature related to genome complexity (CINSARC for Complexity INdex in SARComas) and asked whether it could predict outcome in GISTs. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We carried out genome and expression profiling on 67 primary untreated GISTs. RESULTS: We show and validate here that it can predict metastasis in a new data set of 67 primary untreated GISTs. The gene whose expression was most strongly associated with metastasis was AURKA, but the AURKA locus was not amplified. Instead, we identified deletion of the p16 (CDKN2A) and retinoblastoma (RB1) genes as likely causal events leading to increased AURKA and CINSARC gene expression, to chromosome rearrangement, and ultimately to metastasis. On the basis of these findings, we established a Genomic Index that integrates the number and type of DNA copy number alterations. This index is a strong prognostic factor in GISTs. We show that CINSARC class, AURKA expression, and Genomic Index all outperform the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) grading system in determining the prognosis of patients with GISTs. Interestingly, these signatures can identify poor prognosis patients in the group classified as intermediate-risk by the AFIP classification. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that a high Genomic Index determined by comparative genomic hybridization from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples could be used to identify AFIP intermediate-risk patients who would benefit from imatinib therapy.