Impact of preoperative renal dysfunction on long-term survival for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the degrees of renal dysfunction (RD) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) has not been well described. The purpose of this study was to compare patients undergoing AVR with a range of renal function from normal to dialysis-dependence. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2,408 patients undergoing AVR with or without coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) from January 1996 to March 2009 was performed. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated for patients using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression methods were used to determine the independent association of GFR with outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for in-hospital outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier curves were created to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: In all, 1,512 patients (62.8%) had isolated AVR, and 896 (37.2%) underwent AVR plus CABG. Preoperative RD was common among all patients: 1,148 of 2,408 (47.7%) with mild RD (GFR 60 to 90 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), 644 of 2,408 (26.7%) moderate RD (GFR 30 to 59 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), 59 of 2,408 (2.5%) severe RD (GFR 15 to 30 mL·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)), and 114 (4.7%) with kidney failure (GFR<15) or requiring dialysis. In-hospital mortality generally rose with RD, from 2.9% for patients with no RD to 15.8% for patients with severe RD, and 17.3% for patients requiring dialysis. Patients with severe RD or preoperative dialysis were associated with significantly poorer outcomes. Adjusted long-term survival is progressively worse across levels of RD, as was postoperative length of stay (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative RD is common among the AVR population and is associated with diminished long-term survival. The association between RD and worse outcomes after AVR surgery has significant clinical implications.

Long-term survival for patients with preoperative renal failure undergoing bioprosthetic or mechanical valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess short-term and long-term outcomes after valve replacement with biologic or mechanical prostheses in patients with preoperative end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing valve replacement from January 1996 through March 2008 at Emory Healthcare Hospitals was performed. Outcomes were compared using χ(2) tests and 2-sample t tests. Adjusted long-term survival up to 10 years was assessed with Kaplan-Meier plots and compared between biologic and mechanical replacements using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients underwent 211 valve replacement operations. Patient age was 20 to 83 years (mean age, 54.8 ± 14.0); 115 of 211 (54.5%) were male. Operations included the following: 100 of 211 (47.4%) isolated aortic; 49 of 211 (23.2%) isolated mitral; 4 of 211 (1.9%) isolated tricuspid; and 58 of 211 (27.5%) combined replacements. Thirteen (6.2%) patients underwent reoperative valve replacements. Most patients received bioprosthetic valves (143 of 211, 67.8%), while 68 of 211 (32.2%) received mechanical valves. Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in 53 of 211 (25.1%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was in 42 of 211 patients (19.9%) and was not different between bioprosthetic and mechanical replacements. Overall 10-year survival was 18.1% for all patients and was not influenced by valve type implanted. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with end-stage renal disease treated with dialysis, valve replacement carries acceptable operative mortality. Long-term survival is similar among patients receiving bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve replacement. Careful risk assessment and choice of valve prosthesis should be performed prior to surgical intervention in this high-risk patient population.