A contactless cure: Leveraging telehealth to improve hepatitis C treatment at a safety-net hospital.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes significant mortality worldwide. HCV is highly curable but access to care is limited for many patients. The Grady Liver Clinic (GLC), a primary care-based HCV clinic, utilizes a multidisciplinary team to provide comprehensive care for a medically underserved patient population in Atlanta, Georgia. The GLC added a telehealth option for HCV treatment at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe the outcomes of utilizing telehealth in this population. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who initiated HCV treatment from March 2019 to February 2020 (pre-pandemic) and March 2020 to February 2021 (pandemic). Charts were abstracted for patient demographics and characteristics, treatment regimen, and treatment outcomes. Our primary outcome was HCV cure rate of the pre-pandemic compared to the pandemic cohorts and within the different pandemic cohort visit types. We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for all patients who took at least one dose of a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regardless of therapy completion, and a per-protocol (PP) analysis of those who completed treatment and were tested for HCV cure. SVR12 rates were >95% on ITT analysis, with no significant difference between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts. There was also no significant difference within the pandemic group when treatment was provided traditionally, via telehealth, or via a hybrid of these. Our findings support the use of telehealth as a tool to expand access to HCV treatment in a medically underserved patient population.

Large-Scale, Primary Care-Based Hepatitis C Treatment in an Urban, Medically Underserved Patient Population.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a critical public health concern in the United States. HCV is highly curable, but access to care is limited for many patients. Primary care models can expand access to HCV care. The Grady Liver Clinic (GLC) is a primary care-based HCV clinic founded in 2002. During 20 years, using a multidisciplinary team, the GLC expanded its operations in response to advances in HCV screening and treatment. We describe the clinic model, patient population, and treatment outcomes of the clinic from 2015 through 2019. During this period, 2689 patients were seen in the GLC, and 77% (n = 2083) initiated treatment. Eighty-five percent (1779 of 2083) of patients who started treatment completed treatment and were tested for cure, and 1723 (83% of the total treated cohort, 97% of those tested for cure) were cured. Building on a successful primary care-based treatment model, the GLC dynamically responded to the changes in HCV screening and treatment guidelines, continually increasing access to HCV care. The GLC serves as a model of primary care-based HCV care that aims to achieve HCV microelimination in a safety-net health system. Our findings support the notion that for the United States to achieve elimination of HCV by 2030, generalists can and should provide HCV care, particularly in medically underserved patient populations.

Implementation of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Program for At-risk Patients Safety-Net Hospital: A Model for National Dissemination.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to enhance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening to achieve earlier diagnosis of patients with hepatitis C (HCV) cirrhosis in our Safety-Net population. BACKGROUND: Adherence to HCC screening guidelines at Safety-Net hospitals is poor. Only 23% of patients with HCC at our health system had a screening exam within 1-year of diagnosis and 46% presented with stage IV disease. HCV-induced cirrhosis remains the most common etiology of HCC (75%) in our patients. METHODS: In the setting of an established HCV treatment clinic, an HCC screening quality improvement initiative was initiated for patients with stage 3 fibrosis or cirrhosis by transient elastography. The program consisted of semiannual imaging. Navigators scheduled imaging appointments and tracked compliance. RESULTS: From April 2018 to April 2021, 318 patients were enrolled (mean age 61 years, 81% Black race, 38% uninsured). Adherence to screening was higher than previously reported: 94%, 75%, and 74% of patients completed their first, second, and third imaging tests. Twenty-two patients (7%) were diagnosed with HCC; 55% stage I and 14% stage IV. All patients were referred and 13 (59%) received treatment. Median time to receipt of treatment was 77 days (range, 32-282). Median overall survival for treated patients was 32 months. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an HCC screening program at a safety-net hospital is feasible and facilitated earlier diagnosis in this study. Patient navigation and tracking completion of imaging tests were key components of the program's success. Next steps include expanding the program to additional at-risk populations.

Differences in inpatient and outpatient hepatitis C virus prevalence and linkage to care rates in a safety net hospital hepatitis C screening program.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Routine screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is crucial in identifying the 50% of infected persons unaware of their infection. We added an inpatient screening initiative to our successful outpatient HCV screening program in an urban, safety-net hospital. METHODS: From March 2017 to December 2019, HCV screening was performed in inpatient and outpatient settings at Grady Health System. We compared care cascade outcomes, including anti-HCV testing, RNA testing, and linkage to care (LTC) between these settings. RESULTS: A total of 29 751 patients were tested for anti-HCV: 8883 inpatients and 20 868 outpatients. The anti-HCV population was predominantly Black (76.2%) and male (67.9%). The total anti-HCV prevalence was 8.9%, with 14% of inpatients and 6.7% of outpatients testing positive. RNA testing was performed on 86%. The prevalence of active HCV infection was 59.3% in those that were anti-HCV positive; inpatient prevalence was 66%, and outpatient was 53.8%. Of those with active infection, 67.5% were linked to care (57.3% of inpatients and 77.8% of outpatients). CONCLUSION: We found significant differences in prevalence of anti-HCV and LTC rates between inpatients and outpatients during an HCV screening program. Higher anti-HCV prevalence among inpatients may be due a higher prevalence of non-birth year HCV risk factors. LTC rates were lower in the inpatient setting despite a robust linkage strategy. The striking prevalence of HCV in both settings warrants continued screening, expansion to additional settings, and novel strategies to improve inpatient linkage rates, especially in the setting of new universal HCV screening guidelines.