Triangular fibrocartilage complex injury: outcomes of operative and non-operative management.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence TFCC injuries has increased over time. However, there remains a lack of understanding of its natural history. Along with the paucity of evidence on treatment options, there is lack of consensus on how best to manage them. This is a retrospective study with subgroup cohort analysis, examining variables and management options associated with patient-reported disability and pain. METHODS: Patients from a metropolitan health network who have been referred for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the wrist between 2010 and 2019 and identified to have TFCC injury, were followed up to determine patient-reported outcomes. Disability of arm shoulder and hand scores (DASH) and visual assessment pain scale (VAS) were used to measure disability and pain respectively. An 'excellent' DASH and VAS scores were defined as ≤10 and ≤2, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in this study. There were 53 patients with excellent DASH score, 95 excellent VAS score and 51 excellent outcomes at mean follow-up of 75.5 months (Range: 5-402.8 months). Concomitant pathology and surgical management were less likely to have excellent DASH and VAS scores, while traumatic aetiology and smoking were less likely to have excellent VAS score. Age was not predictive of excellent DASH or VAS score. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of TFCC injuries were associated with worse outcomes than if they were left alone. Smoking cessation is a patient-modifiable risk factor that may help improve outcomes.

Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic knee dislocations: Isolated vs multi-trauma injuries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traumatic dislocation of the knee (TKD) is a rare injury, accounting for approximately 0.02% of orthopaedic injuries. They are a challenging entity for orthopaedic surgeons to manage, and can have devastating consequences. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of traumatic knee dislocations (TKD'S) and contrast the incidence of neurovascular injury between isolated and multi-trauma dislocations as well as key patient reported outcomes achieved between these groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who had a traumatic disruption of the tibiofemoral articulation between March 1 2007 and February 31, 2015 were identified from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR). Data was cross-checked with medical records and radiological reports to confirm true multi-ligamentous dislocation. VOTOR collects information pertaining to orthopaedic injuries, treatment, complications and outcomes from four adult hospitals in Victoria, Australia, including the major trauma centers. Patient-reported outcomes are collected by VOTOR at 12 months post-injury including the EQ-5D-3L (EQ-5D) and Glasgow Extended Outcome Scores (GOS-E) and return to work status. Patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes at 12 months after injury were analysed. RESULTS: A cohort of 88 patients were identified that fit the inclusion criteria for the study, and at 12 months post-injury there was data available for 80 patients (90.9%). There were 38 (42.9%) patients who experienced an isolated traumatic knee dislocation and 52 (57.1%) who experienced a traumatic knee dislocation in association with another injury. Of the 88 patients identified as eligible for the study, two had bilateral knee dislocations, hence there were 90 multi-ligamentous knee injuries. Those who were injured at a higher velocity were more likely to have additional injuries. Dislocations that occurred at a lower velocity were shown to have better overall outcomes, as did dislocations that occurred in isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic knee dislocations that occur in isolation typically result in better outcomes than those that occur with associated injuries. TKD's are a rare but severe injury that requires further research in order for functional outcomes to be optimized.