Menstrual Equity in the Criminal Legal System.

Background: Menstrual equity, that is, access to menstrual products and safe menstruating environments, is a basic human right not available to many vulnerable populations. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a convenience sample of women involved in the criminal legal system to document experiences with access to hygiene and menstrual products while incarcerated. Results: Of the 156 respondents, 62.6% had to trade or barter to receive even basic hygiene products such as soap or shampoo; food and personal favors were used as the common currency. More than half (53.8%) received less than five menstrual products at intake/initial processing; 29.5% had to trade or barter menstrual hygiene products. Almost one-quarter (23.1%) suffered negative health consequences from prolonged use of products because of limited supply. Discussion: Findings document the lack of menstrual equity among women involved in the criminal legal system. Assuring the human right of menstrual equity in this population requires changes at the legal, the policy, the institutional, and the individual level.

Rehumanizing Clinical Language Through Classical Indian Dance.

Members of communities of color have long experienced structural marginalization and biases that have measurable health consequences. When a group of medical students choreograph and perform Kuchipudi and Bharatanatyam forms of Indian classical dance, they illuminate a collaborative, narrative approach to interrogating ethnic and racial biases in clinical jargon. In these video recordings of "Bagalamukhi's Words," performers interpret a patient's embodied, visceral responses to language-induced dehumanization during a clinical encounter. The accompanying commentary helps viewers consider how traditional dance, such as classical Indian dance, is useful as a narrative approach to ethics in health care documentation and communication practices.

Freezing fertility or freezing false hope? A content analysis of social egg freezing in U.S. print media.

In 2012, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) lifted the experimental label on oocyte preservation, but cautioned against women using it to avoid age-related infertility, known as social egg freezing (SEF). In 2014, Facebook and Apple announced that they would offer SEF as a workplace benefit. Within the context of a rapidly growing market for SEF, we were interested in how these two decisions affected media discussions, given that such discourse can strongly influence public perceptions and behaviors. We used a content analysis methodology to code 138 articles published in U.S. newspapers and magazines between 2012 and 2015. Focusing on a financial concern over the cost of SEF and the lack of insurance for SEF, we found that media portrayals of SEF pivot away from the ethical principle of nonmaleficence centered in the ASRM decision to discourage SEF. Instead, they highlight an issue of justice that can be remedied through the offer of SEF as a workplace benefit. Overall, media portrayals of SEF paint a simplistic and rosy picture that more options, especially more reproductive and economic options, automatically enhance women's autonomy.