A qualitative study on the challenges health care professionals face when caring for adolescents and young adults with an uncertain and/or poor cancer prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 18-39 years) with advanced cancer have an increased life expectancy due to improvements and refinements in cancer therapies, resulting in a growing group of AYAs living with an uncertain and/or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP). To date, no studies have examined the difficulties of health care professionals (HCPs) providing care to AYAs with a UPCP. This study aimed to understand the challenges in daily clinical practice experienced by HCPs from different disciplines who provide palliative as well as general care to AYAs with a UPCP. METHODS: HCPs from a variety of backgrounds (e.g. clinical nurse specialists, medical oncologists, neurologists psychologists) were invited for a semi-structured interview. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two AYA patients were actively involved as research partners to increase the relevance of the study design and to optimise interpretation of results. RESULTS: Forty-nine HCPs were interviewed. Overall, we found that the threat of premature death within this young patient group increased emotional impact on HCPs and evoked a feeling of unfairness, which was an extra motivation for HCPs to provide the most optimal care possible. We generated four key themes: (i) emotional confrontation (e.g. feeling helplessness and experiencing a greater sense of empathy), (ii) questioning own professional attitude and skills, (iii) navigating uncertainty (e.g. discussing prognosis and end of life) and (iv) obstacles in the health care organisation (e.g. lack of knowledge and clarity about responsibilities). CONCLUSIONS: HCPs experienced unique emotional and practical challenges when providing care to AYAs with a UPCP. The results from this study highlight the need to develop an education module for HCPs treating AYAs with UPCP to increase their own well-being and optimise the delivery of person- and age-adjusted care.

Pedi-R-MAPP: The development of a nutritional awareness tool for use in remote paediatric consultations using a modified Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Remote Malnutrition Application (R-MAPP) was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide support for health care professionals (HCPs) working in the community to complete remote nutritional assessments, and provide practical guidance for nutritional care. The aim of this study was to modify the R-MAPP into a version suitable for children, Pediatric Remote Malnutrition Application (Pedi-R-MAPP), and provide a structured approach to completing a nutrition focused assessment as part of a technology enabled care service (TECS) consultation. METHODS: A ten-step process was completed: 1) permission to modify adult R-MAPP, 2) literature search to inform the Pedi-R-MAPP content, 3) Pedi-R-MAPP draft, 4) international survey of HCP practice using TECS, 5) nutrition experts invited to participate in a modified Delphi process, 6) first stakeholder meeting to agree purpose/draft of the tool, 7) round-one online survey, 8) statements with consensus removed from survey, 9) round-two online survey for statements with no consensus and 10) second stakeholder meeting with finalisation of the Pedi-R-MAPP nutrition awareness tool. RESULTS: The international survey completed by 463 HCPs, 55% paediatricians, 38% dietitians, 7% nurses/others. When HCPs were asked to look back over the last 12 months, dietitians (n = 110) reported that 5.7 ± 10.6 out of every 10 appointments were completed in person; compared to paediatricians (n = 182) who reported 7.5 ± 7.0 out of every 10 appointments to be in person (p < 0.0001), with the remainder completed as TECS consultations. Overall, 74 articles were identified and used to develop the Pedi-R-MAPP which included colour-coded advice using a traffic light system; green, amber, red and purple. Eighteen participants agreed to participate in the Delphi consensus and completed both rounds of the modified Delphi survey. Agreement was reached at the first meeting on the purpose and draft sections of the proposed tool. In round-one of the online survey, 86% (n = 89/104) of statements reached consensus, whereas in round-two 12.5% (n = 13/104) of statements reached no consensus. At the second expert meeting, contested statements were discussed until agreement was reached and the Pedi-R-MAPP could be finalised. CONCLUSION: The Pedi-R-MAPP nutrition awareness tool was developed using a modified Delphi consensus. This tool aims to support the technological transformation fast-tracked by the COVID-19 pandemic by providing a structured approach to completing a remote nutrition focused assessment, as well as identifying the frequency of follow up along with those children who may require in-person assessment.

The influence of maternal vulnerability and parenting stress on chronic pain in adolescents in a general population sample: the TRAILS study.

Investigating possible psychosocial predictors of unexplained chronic pain in adolescents is crucial in understanding its development and prevention. A general population sample of adolescents (n = 2230) from the TRAILS cohort study was investigated longitudinally to assess the influence of maternal vulnerability, in terms of anxiety, depression and stress, and parenting stress at age 10-12 years, on the presence of chronic pain at age 12-15 years. Of these adolescents, 269 (12.9%) reported experiencing chronic pain, of which 77% reported severe chronic pain and 22% reported multiple chronic pain. Maternal anxiety, maternal stress and higher levels of parenting stress were related to chronic pain at a later age. Subgroup analyses showed similar results for adolescents with severe chronic pain. Mediation analyses indicated that parenting stress mediates the effect between maternal anxiety, or stress, and chronic pain. The findings suggest that interventions to diminish maternal feelings of anxiety and stress, while in turn adjusting maternal behaviour, may prevent the development of chronic pain in adolescence.

Overview of research on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an important outcome measure in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). In this article, an overview is given of the most common measurement instruments of HRQoL, determinants of HRQoL in patients with CLD, and current developments in the implementation of routine measurement of HRQoL in daily clinical practice. Well-developed generic instruments of HRQoL are the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Well-developed liver disease-specific HRQoL instruments are the Hepatitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (HQLQ), the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), the Liver Disease Quality Of Life Questionnaire (LDQOL ), and the Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0 (LDSI 2.0). Commonly used HRQoL measures in cost-effectiveness studies are the Health Utilities Index (HUI), Short Form-6D (SF-6D) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). HRQoL of patients with chronic liver disease has been shown to be impaired, with patients with hepatitis C showing the worst HRQoL. Disease severity, pruritus, joint pain, abdominal pain, muscle cramps, fatigue, depression and anxiety have been associated with HRQoL in patients with CLD. Recently, studies assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of measuring HRQoL in daily clinical practice have been performed, generally showing positive results regarding the discussion of HRQoL-related topics, but mixed results regarding the added value of actual improvement in HRQoL. Furthermore, logistic and attitudinal barriers seem to impede successful implementation. Nevertheless, given the importance of HRQoL in liver patients, we should persist in measuring and subsequently improving HRQoL in clinical practice.

Determinants of quality of life in chronic liver patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Health-related quality of life of patients with chronic liver disease has been shown to be impaired in numerous studies. However, the factors which influence health-related quality of life in treated chronic liver patients are not quite known. This is the first study to assess the impact of physical and psychosocial determinants on a weighted score of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: The data of 1175 chronic liver patients were used to assess the relationship between items of the disease-specific Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0 and the Short Form (SF)-6D weighted utility score by means of linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Health-related quality of life was most strongly related to disease severity (B = -0.029) and joint pain (B = -0.023). Depression (B = -0.014), pain in the right upper abdomen (B = -0.014), decreased appetite (B = 0.014) and fatigue (B = -0.013) were also strongly related to health-related quality of life. In hepatitis C virus patients, disease severity (B = -0.037) and depression (B = -0.030) were strong determinants of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that health-related quality of life in chronic liver patients is clearly determined by disease severity, joint pain, depression, decreased appetite and fatigue. These patients may benefit most from interventions aimed at improving adaptation to the symptoms described.

Male sex and low physical activity are associated with reduced spine bone mineral density in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk of osteoporosis and obesity. We studied bone mineral density (BMD), percent of fat mass (%FM), and activity levels in survivors of ALL treated without radiotherapy. Lumbar and total areal BMD (g/cm2) and %FM were measured in 28 survivors (aged 5.7-14.7 years) of childhood ALL by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (GE Lunar, Prodigy) an average of 5 years after completion of chemotherapy (UK Medical Research Council randomized trial protocol XI [UKALL XI]). One boy fractured his arm during treatment. Apparent volumetric lumbar BMD (BMD(vol); g/cm3) was calculated and %FM was adjusted for sex and age (%FM(adj)). Physical activity was measured by accelerometer and questionnaire. The results were compared with 28 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. Total body and lumbar areal BMD (g/cm2) were not different between the ALL group and the control group. However, mean lumbar BMD(vol) in survivors of ALL was significantly lower than in controls (0.303 +/- 0.036 g/cm3 vs. 0.323 +/- 0.03 g/cm3; p < 0.01), which mostly was caused by the difference in boys (0.287 +/- 0.032 g/cm3 vs. 0.312 +/- 0.027 g/cm3; p < 0.05). Weekly activity score by questionnaire was significantly lower in the ALL group than in the control group (geometric mean 50 vs. geometric mean 74; p < 0.05). Male gender, low activity levels and an intravenous (iv) high dose of methotrexate were associated with low lumbar BMD(vol). Patients who received an iv high dose of methotrexate (n = 18) had significantly higher %FM(adj) than those with intrathecal methotrexate only (n = 10; 141 +/- 70% vs. 98 +/- 37%;p < 0.05). In conclusion, male survivors of childhood ALL have reduced lumbar BMD(vol), whereas no such difference was seen in girls. Overall, survivors of ALL were physically less active than their healthy controls and lower activity correlated with lower lumbar BMD(vol) and higher %FM(adj).