Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair of inguinal hernia in adults: A randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims: Laparoscopic trans abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of hernia is one of the most commonly performed surgeries and may cause significant postoperative pain. Among different truncal block techniques, quadratus lumborum (QL) and transversus abdominis plane blocks (TAP) are used during this abdominal surgery. We aimed to investigate whether, bilateral QL block by trans-muscular approach provided better analgesia as compared to posterior TAP block in these patients. Methods: Forty adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, undergoing inguinal hernia repair were randomized to receive either QL or TAP block, with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine bilaterally. The primary objective of the study was to compare the total fentanyl consumption (in µg) within 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary objectives studied were dermatomal spread, quality of recovery at discharge and at 3 months postoperatively. Results: There was a significant reduction in total 24-hour fentanyl consumption (552 ± 229.56 vs 735.5 ± 264 µg, P =0.01) in the QL group, with longer duration of analgesia [282.5 ± 89.9 min group TAP vs. 354.8 ± 107 min QL, (mean difference -72.34,95% confidence interval -135.516 to -9.024), P =0.03], as compared to TAP group. At T8 and T9 dermatomes, greater proportion of patients in the QL group attained analgesia. Quality of Recovery at 24 hours and at 3 months of follow-up were comparable. Conclusion: QL block provided better perioperative analgesia than TAP block, in patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair. It also leads to greater dermatomal spread but without any decrease in the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively.

Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: CMAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-Blade has been recently introduced for management of pediatric difficult airway. Our primary outcome was to compare glottic view, intubation time, and ease of intubation with the size 2 Macintosh versus D-Blade of C-MAC video laryngoscope in simulated cervical injury in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized crossover study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital of Northern India. Forty children of 4-14 years of age were enrolled in this study. After induction of anesthesia, video laryngoscopy was performed either with size 2 CMAC Macintosh (group M) or D-Blade (group D) with manual in-line stabilization. After removal of the first blade, second video laryngoscopy was performed with the alternative blade. Endotracheal intubation was done with the second laryngoscopy. Best glottic view, time for best glottic view, and difficulty in blade insertion were recorded during both the video laryngoscopies. During second video laryngoscopy, difficulty of tube insertion and time for intubation were noted. RESULTS: The glottic view grade was significantly better in group D compared with the group M (P = 0.0002). Insertion of D-Blade was more difficult than Macintosh blade (P = 0.0007). There was no statistical difference in terms of time for best glottic view in group M and group D (13.40 ± 4.90 vs 13.62 ± 5.60 s) and endotracheal tube insertion time (24.80 ± 7.90 vs 27.90 ± 10.90 s), respectively. Number of intubation attempts was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Size 2 D-Blade of C-MAC video laryngoscope provided a better glottic view in children with simulated cervical spine injury as compared with CMAC Macintosh blade. Success of intubation, intubation time, and ease of intubation were comparable with both the blades.

Pectoral nerve blocks to improve analgesia after breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized and controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided combined pectoral nerve blocks I and II in patients scheduled for surgery for breast cancer. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, control trial. SETTING: Operating rooms in a tertiary care hospital of Northern India. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists status I to II adult women, aged 18-70years were enrolled in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups (30 patients in each group), PECS (P) group and control (C) group. In group P, patients received both general anesthesia and ultrasound guided combined pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I and II). In group C, patients received only general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: We noted pain intensity at rest and during abduction of the ipsilateral upper limb, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; patient's satisfaction with postoperative analgesia and maximal painless abduction at different time intervals in both groups. MAIN RESULTS: There was significant decrease in the total amount of fentanyl requirement in the in P group {(140.66±31.80µg) and (438±71.74µg)} in comparison to C group {(218.33±23.93µg) and (609±53.00µg)} during intraoperative and post-operative period upto 24h respectively. The time to first analgesic requirement was also more in P group (44.33±17.65min) in comparison to C group (10.36±4.97min) during post-operative period. There was less limitation of shoulder movement (pain free mobilization) on the operative site at 4h and 5h after surgery in P group in comparison to C group. However there was no difference in the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (22 out of 30 patients in group P and 20 out of 30 patients in group C) but patients in group P had a better satisfaction score with postoperative analgesia than C group having a p value of <0.001(Score 1; 5 VS 20; Score 2; 12 VS 9; Score 3; 13 VS 1). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guided combined pectoral nerve blocks are an effective modality of analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgeries during perioperative period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2015/12/006457.

Is perioperative administration of 5% dextrose effective in reducing the incidence of PONV in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?: A randomized control trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during perioperative administration of 5% dextrose and normal saline in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Operating rooms in a tertiary care hospital of Northern India. PATIENTS: One hundred patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists status I to II undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups [normal saline (NS) group and 5% dextrose (D) group]. Both the groups received Ringer acetate (Sterofundin ISO) intravenously as a maintenance fluid during intraoperative period. Besides this, patients of group NS received 250ml of 0.9% normal saline and patients of group D received 5% dextrose @ 100ml/h started at the time when gall bladder was taken out. It was continued in the postoperative period with the same rate till it gets finished. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of PONV, Apfel score, intraoperative opioids used and consumption of rescue antiemetics. MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data was statistically similar. Out of total 100 patients, 47 patients (47%) had PONV. In group D, 14 patients (28%) had PONV while in group NS, 33 patients (66%) had PONV within 24h of surgery (p value 0.001). The incidence of PONV was reduced by 38% in group D which is significantly lower when compared with that of group NS (p value 0.001). The consumption of single dose of rescue antiemetics in group D was also reduced by 26% when compared to that of group NS (p value 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative administration of 5% dextrose in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery can reduce PONV significantly and even if PONV occurs, the quantity of rescue antiemetics to combat PONV is also reduced significantly.